Stapled versus hand sewn anastomoses in patients with small bowel injury

A changing perspective

J. D. Witzke, J. J. Kraatz, J. M. Morken, A. L. Ney, M. A. West, J. M. Van Camp, R. T. Zera, J. L. Rodriguez, Gregory Jurkovich, D. Feliciano, P. A. Taheri, J. G. Hinsdale, H. J. Sugerman, D. Demetriades, C. J. Hauser, J. J. Kraatz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Recent studies indicate that trauma patients with hollow viscus injuries requiring anastomosis who are managed with stapling have a higher rate of complications than do those in whom a hand-Sewn anastomosis is used. We undertook this study to determine whether this finding applied to patients with small bowel trauma at our institution. Methods: Records of patients with small bowel injuries were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, severity of injury, injury management, and outcome data were collected. Results: Patients who had their small bowel injuries managed by hand-Sewn repair versus resection and stapled anastomosis demonstrated a nonsignificant decrease in overall complication rate (35% vs. 44%) and rate of intra-abdominal complication (10% vs. 18%). Yet the rate of intra-abdominal abscess formation was significantly lower with hand-sewn repair than with resection and stapled anastomosis (4% vs. 13%). However, when handsewn primary repairs were excluded from the analysis and injuries that required resection and either stapled or hand-sewn anastomosis were compared, there was a similar overall complication rate (41% vs. 41%) and rate of intra-abdominal complications (17% vs. 21%). Conclusion: The rate of intra-abdominal complications did not differ significantly between patients requiring small bowel resection and reanastomosis managed by either a stapled or hand-sewn technique. In our experience, surgical stapling devices appear to be safe for use in repairing traumatic small bowel injury.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)660-666
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume49
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hand
Wounds and Injuries
Surgical Stapling
Abdominal Abscess
Hand Injuries
Viscera
Demography
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Witzke, J. D., Kraatz, J. J., Morken, J. M., Ney, A. L., West, M. A., Van Camp, J. M., ... Kraatz, J. J. (2000). Stapled versus hand sewn anastomoses in patients with small bowel injury: A changing perspective. Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, 49(4), 660-666. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-200010000-00013

Stapled versus hand sewn anastomoses in patients with small bowel injury : A changing perspective. / Witzke, J. D.; Kraatz, J. J.; Morken, J. M.; Ney, A. L.; West, M. A.; Van Camp, J. M.; Zera, R. T.; Rodriguez, J. L.; Jurkovich, Gregory; Feliciano, D.; Taheri, P. A.; Hinsdale, J. G.; Sugerman, H. J.; Demetriades, D.; Hauser, C. J.; Kraatz, J. J.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 49, No. 4, 01.01.2000, p. 660-666.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Witzke, JD, Kraatz, JJ, Morken, JM, Ney, AL, West, MA, Van Camp, JM, Zera, RT, Rodriguez, JL, Jurkovich, G, Feliciano, D, Taheri, PA, Hinsdale, JG, Sugerman, HJ, Demetriades, D, Hauser, CJ & Kraatz, JJ 2000, 'Stapled versus hand sewn anastomoses in patients with small bowel injury: A changing perspective', Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 660-666. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-200010000-00013
Witzke, J. D. ; Kraatz, J. J. ; Morken, J. M. ; Ney, A. L. ; West, M. A. ; Van Camp, J. M. ; Zera, R. T. ; Rodriguez, J. L. ; Jurkovich, Gregory ; Feliciano, D. ; Taheri, P. A. ; Hinsdale, J. G. ; Sugerman, H. J. ; Demetriades, D. ; Hauser, C. J. ; Kraatz, J. J. / Stapled versus hand sewn anastomoses in patients with small bowel injury : A changing perspective. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 2000 ; Vol. 49, No. 4. pp. 660-666.
@article{28263e4810284134929b26387833669b,
title = "Stapled versus hand sewn anastomoses in patients with small bowel injury: A changing perspective",
abstract = "Introduction: Recent studies indicate that trauma patients with hollow viscus injuries requiring anastomosis who are managed with stapling have a higher rate of complications than do those in whom a hand-Sewn anastomosis is used. We undertook this study to determine whether this finding applied to patients with small bowel trauma at our institution. Methods: Records of patients with small bowel injuries were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, severity of injury, injury management, and outcome data were collected. Results: Patients who had their small bowel injuries managed by hand-Sewn repair versus resection and stapled anastomosis demonstrated a nonsignificant decrease in overall complication rate (35{\%} vs. 44{\%}) and rate of intra-abdominal complication (10{\%} vs. 18{\%}). Yet the rate of intra-abdominal abscess formation was significantly lower with hand-sewn repair than with resection and stapled anastomosis (4{\%} vs. 13{\%}). However, when handsewn primary repairs were excluded from the analysis and injuries that required resection and either stapled or hand-sewn anastomosis were compared, there was a similar overall complication rate (41{\%} vs. 41{\%}) and rate of intra-abdominal complications (17{\%} vs. 21{\%}). Conclusion: The rate of intra-abdominal complications did not differ significantly between patients requiring small bowel resection and reanastomosis managed by either a stapled or hand-sewn technique. In our experience, surgical stapling devices appear to be safe for use in repairing traumatic small bowel injury.",
author = "Witzke, {J. D.} and Kraatz, {J. J.} and Morken, {J. M.} and Ney, {A. L.} and West, {M. A.} and {Van Camp}, {J. M.} and Zera, {R. T.} and Rodriguez, {J. L.} and Gregory Jurkovich and D. Feliciano and Taheri, {P. A.} and Hinsdale, {J. G.} and Sugerman, {H. J.} and D. Demetriades and Hauser, {C. J.} and Kraatz, {J. J.}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00005373-200010000-00013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "660--666",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stapled versus hand sewn anastomoses in patients with small bowel injury

T2 - A changing perspective

AU - Witzke, J. D.

AU - Kraatz, J. J.

AU - Morken, J. M.

AU - Ney, A. L.

AU - West, M. A.

AU - Van Camp, J. M.

AU - Zera, R. T.

AU - Rodriguez, J. L.

AU - Jurkovich, Gregory

AU - Feliciano, D.

AU - Taheri, P. A.

AU - Hinsdale, J. G.

AU - Sugerman, H. J.

AU - Demetriades, D.

AU - Hauser, C. J.

AU - Kraatz, J. J.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - Introduction: Recent studies indicate that trauma patients with hollow viscus injuries requiring anastomosis who are managed with stapling have a higher rate of complications than do those in whom a hand-Sewn anastomosis is used. We undertook this study to determine whether this finding applied to patients with small bowel trauma at our institution. Methods: Records of patients with small bowel injuries were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, severity of injury, injury management, and outcome data were collected. Results: Patients who had their small bowel injuries managed by hand-Sewn repair versus resection and stapled anastomosis demonstrated a nonsignificant decrease in overall complication rate (35% vs. 44%) and rate of intra-abdominal complication (10% vs. 18%). Yet the rate of intra-abdominal abscess formation was significantly lower with hand-sewn repair than with resection and stapled anastomosis (4% vs. 13%). However, when handsewn primary repairs were excluded from the analysis and injuries that required resection and either stapled or hand-sewn anastomosis were compared, there was a similar overall complication rate (41% vs. 41%) and rate of intra-abdominal complications (17% vs. 21%). Conclusion: The rate of intra-abdominal complications did not differ significantly between patients requiring small bowel resection and reanastomosis managed by either a stapled or hand-sewn technique. In our experience, surgical stapling devices appear to be safe for use in repairing traumatic small bowel injury.

AB - Introduction: Recent studies indicate that trauma patients with hollow viscus injuries requiring anastomosis who are managed with stapling have a higher rate of complications than do those in whom a hand-Sewn anastomosis is used. We undertook this study to determine whether this finding applied to patients with small bowel trauma at our institution. Methods: Records of patients with small bowel injuries were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, severity of injury, injury management, and outcome data were collected. Results: Patients who had their small bowel injuries managed by hand-Sewn repair versus resection and stapled anastomosis demonstrated a nonsignificant decrease in overall complication rate (35% vs. 44%) and rate of intra-abdominal complication (10% vs. 18%). Yet the rate of intra-abdominal abscess formation was significantly lower with hand-sewn repair than with resection and stapled anastomosis (4% vs. 13%). However, when handsewn primary repairs were excluded from the analysis and injuries that required resection and either stapled or hand-sewn anastomosis were compared, there was a similar overall complication rate (41% vs. 41%) and rate of intra-abdominal complications (17% vs. 21%). Conclusion: The rate of intra-abdominal complications did not differ significantly between patients requiring small bowel resection and reanastomosis managed by either a stapled or hand-sewn technique. In our experience, surgical stapling devices appear to be safe for use in repairing traumatic small bowel injury.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033774672&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033774672&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00005373-200010000-00013

DO - 10.1097/00005373-200010000-00013

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 660

EP - 666

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 4

ER -