Standardization of lipoprotein reporting

M. H. Kroll, T. G. Cole, N. Rifai, G. Cooper, G. R. Warnick, I. Jialal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations


We wanted to ascertain whether the current format of lipid laboratory reports seemed adequate to promote identification and treatment of patients with dyslipidemia. In a random survey of lipid laboratory reports from 25 laboratories, we found great inconsistencies among reporting formats and contents. Fewer than half the laboratories correctly reported the ranges for cholesterol, only 4 correctly reported ranges for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, only 2 correctly reported ranges for triglycerides, and none presented low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ranges in terms of risk factors for coronary heart disease. Reports typically were disjointed and difficult to read. The current practice of reporting results for lipid panels is confusing and does not follow the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) guidelines. We recommend that reporting of results be standardized, and a "model" standardized report is presented herein, based on consensus from a team of experts. The standardized report uses current recommendations for ranges, follows the flowcharts of the NCEP guidelines, and takes the patient's clinical condition (the number of risk factors and the presence of coronary heart disease) into consideration. Standardizing lipid reports should decrease confusion and perhaps increase application of the guidelines and patient compliance with treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)696-702
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology
Issue number5
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes


  • Atherosclerosis
  • Clinical laboratory
  • Coronary artery disease
  • Coronary heart disease

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Standardization of lipoprotein reporting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this