SRT and SBRT

Current practices for QA dosimetry and 3D

Stanley H Benedict, J. Cai, B. Libby, M. Lovelock, D. Schlesinger, K. Sheng, W. Yang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The major feature that separates stereotactic radiation therapy (cranial SRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) from conventional radiation treatment is the delivery of large doses in a few fractions which results in a high biological effective dose (BED). In order to minimize the normal tissue toxicity, quality assurance of the conformation of high doses to the target and rapid fall off doses away from the target is critical. The practice of SRT and SBRT therefore requires a high-level of confidence in the accuracy of the entire treatment delivery process. In SRT and SBRT confidence in this accuracy is accomplished by the integration of modern imaging, simulation, treatment planning and delivery technologies into all phases of the treatment process; from treatment simulation and planning and continuing throughout beam delivery. In this report some of the findings of Task group 101 of the AAPM will be presented which outlines the best-practice guidelines for SBRT. The task group report includes a review of the literature to identify reported clinical findings and expected outcomes for this treatment modality. Information in this task group is provided for establishing an SBRT program, including protocols, equipment, resources, and QA procedures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number012057
Pages (from-to)272-282
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Physics: Conference Series
Volume250
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

dosimeters
radiation therapy
delivery
dosage
planning
confidence
assurance
toxicity
resources
simulation
radiation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

Benedict, S. H., Cai, J., Libby, B., Lovelock, M., Schlesinger, D., Sheng, K., & Yang, W. (2010). SRT and SBRT: Current practices for QA dosimetry and 3D. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 250, 272-282. [012057]. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/250/1/012057

SRT and SBRT : Current practices for QA dosimetry and 3D. / Benedict, Stanley H; Cai, J.; Libby, B.; Lovelock, M.; Schlesinger, D.; Sheng, K.; Yang, W.

In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 250, 012057, 2010, p. 272-282.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Benedict, SH, Cai, J, Libby, B, Lovelock, M, Schlesinger, D, Sheng, K & Yang, W 2010, 'SRT and SBRT: Current practices for QA dosimetry and 3D', Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 250, 012057, pp. 272-282. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/250/1/012057
Benedict, Stanley H ; Cai, J. ; Libby, B. ; Lovelock, M. ; Schlesinger, D. ; Sheng, K. ; Yang, W. / SRT and SBRT : Current practices for QA dosimetry and 3D. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2010 ; Vol. 250. pp. 272-282.
@article{bc8a59ec56754ca38cd258de6a07b257,
title = "SRT and SBRT: Current practices for QA dosimetry and 3D",
abstract = "The major feature that separates stereotactic radiation therapy (cranial SRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) from conventional radiation treatment is the delivery of large doses in a few fractions which results in a high biological effective dose (BED). In order to minimize the normal tissue toxicity, quality assurance of the conformation of high doses to the target and rapid fall off doses away from the target is critical. The practice of SRT and SBRT therefore requires a high-level of confidence in the accuracy of the entire treatment delivery process. In SRT and SBRT confidence in this accuracy is accomplished by the integration of modern imaging, simulation, treatment planning and delivery technologies into all phases of the treatment process; from treatment simulation and planning and continuing throughout beam delivery. In this report some of the findings of Task group 101 of the AAPM will be presented which outlines the best-practice guidelines for SBRT. The task group report includes a review of the literature to identify reported clinical findings and expected outcomes for this treatment modality. Information in this task group is provided for establishing an SBRT program, including protocols, equipment, resources, and QA procedures.",
author = "Benedict, {Stanley H} and J. Cai and B. Libby and M. Lovelock and D. Schlesinger and K. Sheng and W. Yang",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1088/1742-6596/250/1/012057",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "250",
pages = "272--282",
journal = "Journal of Physics: Conference Series",
issn = "1742-6588",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SRT and SBRT

T2 - Current practices for QA dosimetry and 3D

AU - Benedict, Stanley H

AU - Cai, J.

AU - Libby, B.

AU - Lovelock, M.

AU - Schlesinger, D.

AU - Sheng, K.

AU - Yang, W.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The major feature that separates stereotactic radiation therapy (cranial SRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) from conventional radiation treatment is the delivery of large doses in a few fractions which results in a high biological effective dose (BED). In order to minimize the normal tissue toxicity, quality assurance of the conformation of high doses to the target and rapid fall off doses away from the target is critical. The practice of SRT and SBRT therefore requires a high-level of confidence in the accuracy of the entire treatment delivery process. In SRT and SBRT confidence in this accuracy is accomplished by the integration of modern imaging, simulation, treatment planning and delivery technologies into all phases of the treatment process; from treatment simulation and planning and continuing throughout beam delivery. In this report some of the findings of Task group 101 of the AAPM will be presented which outlines the best-practice guidelines for SBRT. The task group report includes a review of the literature to identify reported clinical findings and expected outcomes for this treatment modality. Information in this task group is provided for establishing an SBRT program, including protocols, equipment, resources, and QA procedures.

AB - The major feature that separates stereotactic radiation therapy (cranial SRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) from conventional radiation treatment is the delivery of large doses in a few fractions which results in a high biological effective dose (BED). In order to minimize the normal tissue toxicity, quality assurance of the conformation of high doses to the target and rapid fall off doses away from the target is critical. The practice of SRT and SBRT therefore requires a high-level of confidence in the accuracy of the entire treatment delivery process. In SRT and SBRT confidence in this accuracy is accomplished by the integration of modern imaging, simulation, treatment planning and delivery technologies into all phases of the treatment process; from treatment simulation and planning and continuing throughout beam delivery. In this report some of the findings of Task group 101 of the AAPM will be presented which outlines the best-practice guidelines for SBRT. The task group report includes a review of the literature to identify reported clinical findings and expected outcomes for this treatment modality. Information in this task group is provided for establishing an SBRT program, including protocols, equipment, resources, and QA procedures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650564969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650564969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/1742-6596/250/1/012057

DO - 10.1088/1742-6596/250/1/012057

M3 - Article

VL - 250

SP - 272

EP - 282

JO - Journal of Physics: Conference Series

JF - Journal of Physics: Conference Series

SN - 1742-6588

M1 - 012057

ER -