Splenectomy and the risk of sepsis: a population-based cohort study

Gustaf Edgren, Rikke Almqvist, Mikael Hartman, Garth H Utter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to estimate the long-term risk of sepsis in patients who underwent splenectomy before, during, and after implementation of vaccination.

BACKGROUND: Because patients who have undergone splenectomy are considered at increased risk of bacterial sepsis, they typically receive vaccination, education, and occasionally antibiotic prophylaxis. However, the extent to which these interventions have actually reduced the risk of sepsis remains unclear.

METHODS: Retrospective cohort study encompassing all patients in the Swedish national inpatient register, who underwent splenectomy in 1970-2009. Patients were followed for hospitalization for or death from sepsis, as identified using national inpatient and cause of death registers. Relative risks, comparing patients to the background population were expressed as standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs).

RESULTS: Altogether, 20,132 splenectomized patients were included. The overall SIR for hospitalization for sepsis was 5.7 [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.6-6.0]. However, risks depended on the indication for splenectomy, with SIRs varying from 3.4 (95% CI, 3.0-3.8) for trauma patients to 18 (95% CI, 16-19) for patients with hematologic malignancies. SMRs ranged from 3.1 (95% CI, 2.1-4.3) for trauma to 8.7 (95% CI, 6.8-11) for hematologic disease. In regression analyses adjusting for age at splenectomy, follow-up time, sex, and calendar year of splenectomy, there were no significant risk decreases after implementation of routine vaccination, except for in patients with malignant and non-malignant hematologic disease.

CONCLUSIONS: The risk of hospitalization or death from sepsis is high in patients who previously underwent splenectomy and depends on the indication for splenectomy. The effectiveness of current vaccination practices warrants further evaluation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1081-1087
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Surgery
Volume260
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

Fingerprint

Splenectomy
Sepsis
Cohort Studies
Population
Confidence Intervals
Vaccination
Hospitalization
Hematologic Diseases
Inpatients
Incidence
Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Mortality
Wounds and Injuries
Hematologic Neoplasms
Cause of Death
Retrospective Studies
Regression Analysis
Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Splenectomy and the risk of sepsis : a population-based cohort study. / Edgren, Gustaf; Almqvist, Rikke; Hartman, Mikael; Utter, Garth H.

In: Annals of Surgery, Vol. 260, No. 6, 01.12.2014, p. 1081-1087.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Edgren, Gustaf ; Almqvist, Rikke ; Hartman, Mikael ; Utter, Garth H. / Splenectomy and the risk of sepsis : a population-based cohort study. In: Annals of Surgery. 2014 ; Vol. 260, No. 6. pp. 1081-1087.
@article{2f30007055de4365925906d214a2a09b,
title = "Splenectomy and the risk of sepsis: a population-based cohort study",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: We sought to estimate the long-term risk of sepsis in patients who underwent splenectomy before, during, and after implementation of vaccination.BACKGROUND: Because patients who have undergone splenectomy are considered at increased risk of bacterial sepsis, they typically receive vaccination, education, and occasionally antibiotic prophylaxis. However, the extent to which these interventions have actually reduced the risk of sepsis remains unclear.METHODS: Retrospective cohort study encompassing all patients in the Swedish national inpatient register, who underwent splenectomy in 1970-2009. Patients were followed for hospitalization for or death from sepsis, as identified using national inpatient and cause of death registers. Relative risks, comparing patients to the background population were expressed as standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs).RESULTS: Altogether, 20,132 splenectomized patients were included. The overall SIR for hospitalization for sepsis was 5.7 [95{\%} confidence interval (CI), 5.6-6.0]. However, risks depended on the indication for splenectomy, with SIRs varying from 3.4 (95{\%} CI, 3.0-3.8) for trauma patients to 18 (95{\%} CI, 16-19) for patients with hematologic malignancies. SMRs ranged from 3.1 (95{\%} CI, 2.1-4.3) for trauma to 8.7 (95{\%} CI, 6.8-11) for hematologic disease. In regression analyses adjusting for age at splenectomy, follow-up time, sex, and calendar year of splenectomy, there were no significant risk decreases after implementation of routine vaccination, except for in patients with malignant and non-malignant hematologic disease.CONCLUSIONS: The risk of hospitalization or death from sepsis is high in patients who previously underwent splenectomy and depends on the indication for splenectomy. The effectiveness of current vaccination practices warrants further evaluation.",
author = "Gustaf Edgren and Rikke Almqvist and Mikael Hartman and Utter, {Garth H}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/SLA.0000000000000439",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "260",
pages = "1081--1087",
journal = "Annals of Surgery",
issn = "0003-4932",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Splenectomy and the risk of sepsis

T2 - a population-based cohort study

AU - Edgren, Gustaf

AU - Almqvist, Rikke

AU - Hartman, Mikael

AU - Utter, Garth H

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: We sought to estimate the long-term risk of sepsis in patients who underwent splenectomy before, during, and after implementation of vaccination.BACKGROUND: Because patients who have undergone splenectomy are considered at increased risk of bacterial sepsis, they typically receive vaccination, education, and occasionally antibiotic prophylaxis. However, the extent to which these interventions have actually reduced the risk of sepsis remains unclear.METHODS: Retrospective cohort study encompassing all patients in the Swedish national inpatient register, who underwent splenectomy in 1970-2009. Patients were followed for hospitalization for or death from sepsis, as identified using national inpatient and cause of death registers. Relative risks, comparing patients to the background population were expressed as standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs).RESULTS: Altogether, 20,132 splenectomized patients were included. The overall SIR for hospitalization for sepsis was 5.7 [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.6-6.0]. However, risks depended on the indication for splenectomy, with SIRs varying from 3.4 (95% CI, 3.0-3.8) for trauma patients to 18 (95% CI, 16-19) for patients with hematologic malignancies. SMRs ranged from 3.1 (95% CI, 2.1-4.3) for trauma to 8.7 (95% CI, 6.8-11) for hematologic disease. In regression analyses adjusting for age at splenectomy, follow-up time, sex, and calendar year of splenectomy, there were no significant risk decreases after implementation of routine vaccination, except for in patients with malignant and non-malignant hematologic disease.CONCLUSIONS: The risk of hospitalization or death from sepsis is high in patients who previously underwent splenectomy and depends on the indication for splenectomy. The effectiveness of current vaccination practices warrants further evaluation.

AB - OBJECTIVE: We sought to estimate the long-term risk of sepsis in patients who underwent splenectomy before, during, and after implementation of vaccination.BACKGROUND: Because patients who have undergone splenectomy are considered at increased risk of bacterial sepsis, they typically receive vaccination, education, and occasionally antibiotic prophylaxis. However, the extent to which these interventions have actually reduced the risk of sepsis remains unclear.METHODS: Retrospective cohort study encompassing all patients in the Swedish national inpatient register, who underwent splenectomy in 1970-2009. Patients were followed for hospitalization for or death from sepsis, as identified using national inpatient and cause of death registers. Relative risks, comparing patients to the background population were expressed as standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs).RESULTS: Altogether, 20,132 splenectomized patients were included. The overall SIR for hospitalization for sepsis was 5.7 [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.6-6.0]. However, risks depended on the indication for splenectomy, with SIRs varying from 3.4 (95% CI, 3.0-3.8) for trauma patients to 18 (95% CI, 16-19) for patients with hematologic malignancies. SMRs ranged from 3.1 (95% CI, 2.1-4.3) for trauma to 8.7 (95% CI, 6.8-11) for hematologic disease. In regression analyses adjusting for age at splenectomy, follow-up time, sex, and calendar year of splenectomy, there were no significant risk decreases after implementation of routine vaccination, except for in patients with malignant and non-malignant hematologic disease.CONCLUSIONS: The risk of hospitalization or death from sepsis is high in patients who previously underwent splenectomy and depends on the indication for splenectomy. The effectiveness of current vaccination practices warrants further evaluation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922327625&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922327625&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000439

DO - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000439

M3 - Article

C2 - 24374533

AN - SCOPUS:84922327625

VL - 260

SP - 1081

EP - 1087

JO - Annals of Surgery

JF - Annals of Surgery

SN - 0003-4932

IS - 6

ER -