Spinal Sealant System Provides Better Intraoperative Watertight Closure Than Standard of Care during Spinal Surgery

A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study

Neill M. Wright, Jon Park, John M. Tew, Kee D Kim, Mark E. Shaffrey, Joseph Cheng, Haroon Choudhri, Ajit A. Krishnaney, R. Scott Graham, Ehud Mendel, Nathan Simmons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design. Prospective, 3:1 randomized, single-blind, multicenter investigational study. Objective. To assess the safety and efficacy of a low-swell spinal sealant when used as an adjunct to sutured dural repair compared with standard of care methods to obtain watertight dural closure in subjects undergoing spinal surgery. Summary of Background Data. Watertight dural closure is paramount in spinal surgery to avoid complications of cerebrospinal fluid leak. Prior reports have proven the efficacy of a synthetic, absorbable polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel sealant in spinal surgery compared with standard of care. Given the potential concerns of swelling in spinal applications, the hydrogel was modified to a low-swell formulation. Methods. The primary endpoint was success rate in obtaining intraoperative watertight dural closure in subjects receiving PEG hydrogel sealant versus a control group of subjects receiving any standard method designed to provide intraoperative watertight closure. Subjects were evaluated at discharge and at 30 and 90 days postprocedure for cerebrospinal fluid leaks, surgical site infections, and adverse events. Results. Between May 2007 and May 2009, 98 subjects (74 PEG hydrogel spinal sealant, 24 control) were randomized at 14 clinical sites in the United States. Patients treated with the PEG hydrogel spinal sealant had a significantly higher rate of watertight closure than the control (98.6% vs. 79.2%, P = 0.003). No statistical differences were seen in postoperative cerebrospinal fluid, infection, and wound healing. No neurological deficits were seen attributable to the sealant. Conclusion. The low-swell PEG hydrogel spinal sealant evaluated in this study has been proven safe and effective for providing watertight closure when used as an adjunct to sutured closure of intentional durotomies during spinal surgery. PEG hydrogel sealants have again proved superior to other standard of care technologies for safe, efficacious dural closure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)505-513
Number of pages9
JournalSpine
Volume40
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 15 2015

Fingerprint

Hydrogel
Standard of Care
Surgical Wound Infection
Wound Healing
Multicenter Studies
Cerebrospinal Fluid
Technology
Safety
Control Groups
Infection

Keywords

  • cerebrospinal fluid
  • dura mater
  • duraseal spinal sealant
  • hydrogel
  • polyethylene glycols
  • prospective studies
  • randomized controlled trial
  • single-blind
  • spine
  • tissue adhesives
  • treatment outcome
  • wound healing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Spinal Sealant System Provides Better Intraoperative Watertight Closure Than Standard of Care during Spinal Surgery : A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study. / Wright, Neill M.; Park, Jon; Tew, John M.; Kim, Kee D; Shaffrey, Mark E.; Cheng, Joseph; Choudhri, Haroon; Krishnaney, Ajit A.; Graham, R. Scott; Mendel, Ehud; Simmons, Nathan.

In: Spine, Vol. 40, No. 8, 15.04.2015, p. 505-513.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wright, NM, Park, J, Tew, JM, Kim, KD, Shaffrey, ME, Cheng, J, Choudhri, H, Krishnaney, AA, Graham, RS, Mendel, E & Simmons, N 2015, 'Spinal Sealant System Provides Better Intraoperative Watertight Closure Than Standard of Care during Spinal Surgery: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study', Spine, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 505-513. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000810
Wright, Neill M. ; Park, Jon ; Tew, John M. ; Kim, Kee D ; Shaffrey, Mark E. ; Cheng, Joseph ; Choudhri, Haroon ; Krishnaney, Ajit A. ; Graham, R. Scott ; Mendel, Ehud ; Simmons, Nathan. / Spinal Sealant System Provides Better Intraoperative Watertight Closure Than Standard of Care during Spinal Surgery : A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study. In: Spine. 2015 ; Vol. 40, No. 8. pp. 505-513.
@article{34f9b89c02b243bcbed9bb43fc3abdd9,
title = "Spinal Sealant System Provides Better Intraoperative Watertight Closure Than Standard of Care during Spinal Surgery: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study",
abstract = "Study Design. Prospective, 3:1 randomized, single-blind, multicenter investigational study. Objective. To assess the safety and efficacy of a low-swell spinal sealant when used as an adjunct to sutured dural repair compared with standard of care methods to obtain watertight dural closure in subjects undergoing spinal surgery. Summary of Background Data. Watertight dural closure is paramount in spinal surgery to avoid complications of cerebrospinal fluid leak. Prior reports have proven the efficacy of a synthetic, absorbable polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel sealant in spinal surgery compared with standard of care. Given the potential concerns of swelling in spinal applications, the hydrogel was modified to a low-swell formulation. Methods. The primary endpoint was success rate in obtaining intraoperative watertight dural closure in subjects receiving PEG hydrogel sealant versus a control group of subjects receiving any standard method designed to provide intraoperative watertight closure. Subjects were evaluated at discharge and at 30 and 90 days postprocedure for cerebrospinal fluid leaks, surgical site infections, and adverse events. Results. Between May 2007 and May 2009, 98 subjects (74 PEG hydrogel spinal sealant, 24 control) were randomized at 14 clinical sites in the United States. Patients treated with the PEG hydrogel spinal sealant had a significantly higher rate of watertight closure than the control (98.6{\%} vs. 79.2{\%}, P = 0.003). No statistical differences were seen in postoperative cerebrospinal fluid, infection, and wound healing. No neurological deficits were seen attributable to the sealant. Conclusion. The low-swell PEG hydrogel spinal sealant evaluated in this study has been proven safe and effective for providing watertight closure when used as an adjunct to sutured closure of intentional durotomies during spinal surgery. PEG hydrogel sealants have again proved superior to other standard of care technologies for safe, efficacious dural closure.",
keywords = "cerebrospinal fluid, dura mater, duraseal spinal sealant, hydrogel, polyethylene glycols, prospective studies, randomized controlled trial, single-blind, spine, tissue adhesives, treatment outcome, wound healing",
author = "Wright, {Neill M.} and Jon Park and Tew, {John M.} and Kim, {Kee D} and Shaffrey, {Mark E.} and Joseph Cheng and Haroon Choudhri and Krishnaney, {Ajit A.} and Graham, {R. Scott} and Ehud Mendel and Nathan Simmons",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0000000000000810",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "505--513",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spinal Sealant System Provides Better Intraoperative Watertight Closure Than Standard of Care during Spinal Surgery

T2 - A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study

AU - Wright, Neill M.

AU - Park, Jon

AU - Tew, John M.

AU - Kim, Kee D

AU - Shaffrey, Mark E.

AU - Cheng, Joseph

AU - Choudhri, Haroon

AU - Krishnaney, Ajit A.

AU - Graham, R. Scott

AU - Mendel, Ehud

AU - Simmons, Nathan

PY - 2015/4/15

Y1 - 2015/4/15

N2 - Study Design. Prospective, 3:1 randomized, single-blind, multicenter investigational study. Objective. To assess the safety and efficacy of a low-swell spinal sealant when used as an adjunct to sutured dural repair compared with standard of care methods to obtain watertight dural closure in subjects undergoing spinal surgery. Summary of Background Data. Watertight dural closure is paramount in spinal surgery to avoid complications of cerebrospinal fluid leak. Prior reports have proven the efficacy of a synthetic, absorbable polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel sealant in spinal surgery compared with standard of care. Given the potential concerns of swelling in spinal applications, the hydrogel was modified to a low-swell formulation. Methods. The primary endpoint was success rate in obtaining intraoperative watertight dural closure in subjects receiving PEG hydrogel sealant versus a control group of subjects receiving any standard method designed to provide intraoperative watertight closure. Subjects were evaluated at discharge and at 30 and 90 days postprocedure for cerebrospinal fluid leaks, surgical site infections, and adverse events. Results. Between May 2007 and May 2009, 98 subjects (74 PEG hydrogel spinal sealant, 24 control) were randomized at 14 clinical sites in the United States. Patients treated with the PEG hydrogel spinal sealant had a significantly higher rate of watertight closure than the control (98.6% vs. 79.2%, P = 0.003). No statistical differences were seen in postoperative cerebrospinal fluid, infection, and wound healing. No neurological deficits were seen attributable to the sealant. Conclusion. The low-swell PEG hydrogel spinal sealant evaluated in this study has been proven safe and effective for providing watertight closure when used as an adjunct to sutured closure of intentional durotomies during spinal surgery. PEG hydrogel sealants have again proved superior to other standard of care technologies for safe, efficacious dural closure.

AB - Study Design. Prospective, 3:1 randomized, single-blind, multicenter investigational study. Objective. To assess the safety and efficacy of a low-swell spinal sealant when used as an adjunct to sutured dural repair compared with standard of care methods to obtain watertight dural closure in subjects undergoing spinal surgery. Summary of Background Data. Watertight dural closure is paramount in spinal surgery to avoid complications of cerebrospinal fluid leak. Prior reports have proven the efficacy of a synthetic, absorbable polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel sealant in spinal surgery compared with standard of care. Given the potential concerns of swelling in spinal applications, the hydrogel was modified to a low-swell formulation. Methods. The primary endpoint was success rate in obtaining intraoperative watertight dural closure in subjects receiving PEG hydrogel sealant versus a control group of subjects receiving any standard method designed to provide intraoperative watertight closure. Subjects were evaluated at discharge and at 30 and 90 days postprocedure for cerebrospinal fluid leaks, surgical site infections, and adverse events. Results. Between May 2007 and May 2009, 98 subjects (74 PEG hydrogel spinal sealant, 24 control) were randomized at 14 clinical sites in the United States. Patients treated with the PEG hydrogel spinal sealant had a significantly higher rate of watertight closure than the control (98.6% vs. 79.2%, P = 0.003). No statistical differences were seen in postoperative cerebrospinal fluid, infection, and wound healing. No neurological deficits were seen attributable to the sealant. Conclusion. The low-swell PEG hydrogel spinal sealant evaluated in this study has been proven safe and effective for providing watertight closure when used as an adjunct to sutured closure of intentional durotomies during spinal surgery. PEG hydrogel sealants have again proved superior to other standard of care technologies for safe, efficacious dural closure.

KW - cerebrospinal fluid

KW - dura mater

KW - duraseal spinal sealant

KW - hydrogel

KW - polyethylene glycols

KW - prospective studies

KW - randomized controlled trial

KW - single-blind

KW - spine

KW - tissue adhesives

KW - treatment outcome

KW - wound healing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958107276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958107276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000810

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000810

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 505

EP - 513

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 8

ER -