Specificity: A phenotypic comparison of communication-relevant domains between youth with down syndrome and fragile X syndrome

Laura Del Hoyo Soriano, Angela John Thurman, Leonard J Abbeduto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite the shared presence of an intellectual disability (ID), there is a growing literature documenting important phenotypic differences between Down syndrome (DS) and fragile X syndrome (FXS). These conclusions, however, are based on a synthesis across studies, each of which typically includes only measures of a limited number of constructs, and with differing participant characteristics. Firmer conclusions regarding specific phenotypes require a single comprehensive multi-domain assessment of participants with the syndrome groups being well matched on chronological age (CA) and cognitive functioning. The current study was designed to fill this gap by assessing several important cognitive and behavioral domains relevant to communication, such as: structural language skills, false belief understanding, as well as pragmatics and behavioral difficulties, in 30 adolescents of both sexes with DS and 39 males with FXS, matched on CA and nonverbal (NV) cognition. After statistically controlling for NV cognition, we did not find significant syndrome differences in expressive and receptive structural language or false belief understanding. In contrast, participants with DS displayed less stereotyped language and fewer behavioral difficulties compared to males with FXS. Within-syndrome associations among the targeted domains are described. Finally, females with DS were less impaired than males with DS in almost all structural language domains, whereas no significant sex-related differences were observed in NV cognition, false belief understanding, pragmatics, or behavior. Clinical and methodological implications of the findings are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number424
JournalFrontiers in Genetics
Volume9
Issue numberOCT
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2018

Fingerprint

Fragile X Syndrome
Down Syndrome
Communication
Language
Cognition
Sex Characteristics
Intellectual Disability
Phenotype

Keywords

  • Behavior
  • Communication
  • Down syndrome
  • False belief understanding
  • Fragile X syndrome
  • Language
  • Phenotype

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Medicine
  • Genetics
  • Genetics(clinical)

Cite this

Specificity : A phenotypic comparison of communication-relevant domains between youth with down syndrome and fragile X syndrome. / Del Hoyo Soriano, Laura; Thurman, Angela John; Abbeduto, Leonard J.

In: Frontiers in Genetics, Vol. 9, No. OCT, 424, 01.10.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ec09e77477134a9bad42c48cc4bea0cd,
title = "Specificity: A phenotypic comparison of communication-relevant domains between youth with down syndrome and fragile X syndrome",
abstract = "Despite the shared presence of an intellectual disability (ID), there is a growing literature documenting important phenotypic differences between Down syndrome (DS) and fragile X syndrome (FXS). These conclusions, however, are based on a synthesis across studies, each of which typically includes only measures of a limited number of constructs, and with differing participant characteristics. Firmer conclusions regarding specific phenotypes require a single comprehensive multi-domain assessment of participants with the syndrome groups being well matched on chronological age (CA) and cognitive functioning. The current study was designed to fill this gap by assessing several important cognitive and behavioral domains relevant to communication, such as: structural language skills, false belief understanding, as well as pragmatics and behavioral difficulties, in 30 adolescents of both sexes with DS and 39 males with FXS, matched on CA and nonverbal (NV) cognition. After statistically controlling for NV cognition, we did not find significant syndrome differences in expressive and receptive structural language or false belief understanding. In contrast, participants with DS displayed less stereotyped language and fewer behavioral difficulties compared to males with FXS. Within-syndrome associations among the targeted domains are described. Finally, females with DS were less impaired than males with DS in almost all structural language domains, whereas no significant sex-related differences were observed in NV cognition, false belief understanding, pragmatics, or behavior. Clinical and methodological implications of the findings are discussed.",
keywords = "Behavior, Communication, Down syndrome, False belief understanding, Fragile X syndrome, Language, Phenotype",
author = "{Del Hoyo Soriano}, Laura and Thurman, {Angela John} and Abbeduto, {Leonard J}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3389/fgene.2018.00424",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
journal = "Frontiers in Genetics",
issn = "1664-8021",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S. A.",
number = "OCT",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Specificity

T2 - A phenotypic comparison of communication-relevant domains between youth with down syndrome and fragile X syndrome

AU - Del Hoyo Soriano, Laura

AU - Thurman, Angela John

AU - Abbeduto, Leonard J

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - Despite the shared presence of an intellectual disability (ID), there is a growing literature documenting important phenotypic differences between Down syndrome (DS) and fragile X syndrome (FXS). These conclusions, however, are based on a synthesis across studies, each of which typically includes only measures of a limited number of constructs, and with differing participant characteristics. Firmer conclusions regarding specific phenotypes require a single comprehensive multi-domain assessment of participants with the syndrome groups being well matched on chronological age (CA) and cognitive functioning. The current study was designed to fill this gap by assessing several important cognitive and behavioral domains relevant to communication, such as: structural language skills, false belief understanding, as well as pragmatics and behavioral difficulties, in 30 adolescents of both sexes with DS and 39 males with FXS, matched on CA and nonverbal (NV) cognition. After statistically controlling for NV cognition, we did not find significant syndrome differences in expressive and receptive structural language or false belief understanding. In contrast, participants with DS displayed less stereotyped language and fewer behavioral difficulties compared to males with FXS. Within-syndrome associations among the targeted domains are described. Finally, females with DS were less impaired than males with DS in almost all structural language domains, whereas no significant sex-related differences were observed in NV cognition, false belief understanding, pragmatics, or behavior. Clinical and methodological implications of the findings are discussed.

AB - Despite the shared presence of an intellectual disability (ID), there is a growing literature documenting important phenotypic differences between Down syndrome (DS) and fragile X syndrome (FXS). These conclusions, however, are based on a synthesis across studies, each of which typically includes only measures of a limited number of constructs, and with differing participant characteristics. Firmer conclusions regarding specific phenotypes require a single comprehensive multi-domain assessment of participants with the syndrome groups being well matched on chronological age (CA) and cognitive functioning. The current study was designed to fill this gap by assessing several important cognitive and behavioral domains relevant to communication, such as: structural language skills, false belief understanding, as well as pragmatics and behavioral difficulties, in 30 adolescents of both sexes with DS and 39 males with FXS, matched on CA and nonverbal (NV) cognition. After statistically controlling for NV cognition, we did not find significant syndrome differences in expressive and receptive structural language or false belief understanding. In contrast, participants with DS displayed less stereotyped language and fewer behavioral difficulties compared to males with FXS. Within-syndrome associations among the targeted domains are described. Finally, females with DS were less impaired than males with DS in almost all structural language domains, whereas no significant sex-related differences were observed in NV cognition, false belief understanding, pragmatics, or behavior. Clinical and methodological implications of the findings are discussed.

KW - Behavior

KW - Communication

KW - Down syndrome

KW - False belief understanding

KW - Fragile X syndrome

KW - Language

KW - Phenotype

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055347204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055347204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fgene.2018.00424

DO - 10.3389/fgene.2018.00424

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85055347204

VL - 9

JO - Frontiers in Genetics

JF - Frontiers in Genetics

SN - 1664-8021

IS - OCT

M1 - 424

ER -