Software-induced variance in two-dimensional gel electrophoresis image analysis

Åsa M. Wheelock, Alan R Buckpitt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Experimental variability in 2-DE is well documented, but little attention has been paid to variability arising from postexperimental quantitative analyses using various 2-DE software packages. The performance of two 2-DE analysis software programs, Phoretix 2D Expression v2004 (Expression) and PDQuest 7.2 (PDQuest), was evaluated in this study. All available background subtraction and smoothing algorithms were tested using both data generated from one single 2-DE gel image, thus excluding experimental variance, and with authentic sets of replicate gels (n = 5). A slight shift of the image boundaries (the "cropping area") caused both programs to induce variance in protein spot quantification of otherwise identical gel images. The resulting variance for PDQuest (CVmean = 8%) was approximately twice that for Expression (CVmean = 4%). In authentic sets of replicate 2-DE gels (n = 5), the experimental variance confounded the software-induced variance to some extent. However, Expression still outperformed PDQuest, which exhibited software-induced variance as high as 25% of the total observed variance. Surprisingly, the complete omission of background subtraction algorithms resulted in the least amount of software-based variance. These data indicate that 2-DE gel analysis software constitutes a significant source of the variance observed in quantitative proteomics, and that the use of background subtraction algorithms can further increase the variance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4508-4520
Number of pages13
JournalElectrophoresis
Volume26
Issue number23
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2005

Fingerprint

Electrophoresis, Gel, Two-Dimensional
Electrophoresis
Image analysis
Software
Gels
Software packages
Proteomics
Proteins

Keywords

  • PDQuest
  • Phoretix 2D Expression
  • Proteomics
  • Quantitative two-dimensional gel electrophoresis
  • Variance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Biochemistry

Cite this

Software-induced variance in two-dimensional gel electrophoresis image analysis. / Wheelock, Åsa M.; Buckpitt, Alan R.

In: Electrophoresis, Vol. 26, No. 23, 12.2005, p. 4508-4520.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9524f3d7e17045fd9b08d6b46978a077,
title = "Software-induced variance in two-dimensional gel electrophoresis image analysis",
abstract = "Experimental variability in 2-DE is well documented, but little attention has been paid to variability arising from postexperimental quantitative analyses using various 2-DE software packages. The performance of two 2-DE analysis software programs, Phoretix 2D Expression v2004 (Expression) and PDQuest 7.2 (PDQuest), was evaluated in this study. All available background subtraction and smoothing algorithms were tested using both data generated from one single 2-DE gel image, thus excluding experimental variance, and with authentic sets of replicate gels (n = 5). A slight shift of the image boundaries (the {"}cropping area{"}) caused both programs to induce variance in protein spot quantification of otherwise identical gel images. The resulting variance for PDQuest (CVmean = 8{\%}) was approximately twice that for Expression (CVmean = 4{\%}). In authentic sets of replicate 2-DE gels (n = 5), the experimental variance confounded the software-induced variance to some extent. However, Expression still outperformed PDQuest, which exhibited software-induced variance as high as 25{\%} of the total observed variance. Surprisingly, the complete omission of background subtraction algorithms resulted in the least amount of software-based variance. These data indicate that 2-DE gel analysis software constitutes a significant source of the variance observed in quantitative proteomics, and that the use of background subtraction algorithms can further increase the variance.",
keywords = "PDQuest, Phoretix 2D Expression, Proteomics, Quantitative two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, Variance",
author = "Wheelock, {{\AA}sa M.} and Buckpitt, {Alan R}",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1002/elps.200500253",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "4508--4520",
journal = "Electrophoresis",
issn = "0173-0835",
publisher = "Wiley-VCH Verlag",
number = "23",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Software-induced variance in two-dimensional gel electrophoresis image analysis

AU - Wheelock, Åsa M.

AU - Buckpitt, Alan R

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - Experimental variability in 2-DE is well documented, but little attention has been paid to variability arising from postexperimental quantitative analyses using various 2-DE software packages. The performance of two 2-DE analysis software programs, Phoretix 2D Expression v2004 (Expression) and PDQuest 7.2 (PDQuest), was evaluated in this study. All available background subtraction and smoothing algorithms were tested using both data generated from one single 2-DE gel image, thus excluding experimental variance, and with authentic sets of replicate gels (n = 5). A slight shift of the image boundaries (the "cropping area") caused both programs to induce variance in protein spot quantification of otherwise identical gel images. The resulting variance for PDQuest (CVmean = 8%) was approximately twice that for Expression (CVmean = 4%). In authentic sets of replicate 2-DE gels (n = 5), the experimental variance confounded the software-induced variance to some extent. However, Expression still outperformed PDQuest, which exhibited software-induced variance as high as 25% of the total observed variance. Surprisingly, the complete omission of background subtraction algorithms resulted in the least amount of software-based variance. These data indicate that 2-DE gel analysis software constitutes a significant source of the variance observed in quantitative proteomics, and that the use of background subtraction algorithms can further increase the variance.

AB - Experimental variability in 2-DE is well documented, but little attention has been paid to variability arising from postexperimental quantitative analyses using various 2-DE software packages. The performance of two 2-DE analysis software programs, Phoretix 2D Expression v2004 (Expression) and PDQuest 7.2 (PDQuest), was evaluated in this study. All available background subtraction and smoothing algorithms were tested using both data generated from one single 2-DE gel image, thus excluding experimental variance, and with authentic sets of replicate gels (n = 5). A slight shift of the image boundaries (the "cropping area") caused both programs to induce variance in protein spot quantification of otherwise identical gel images. The resulting variance for PDQuest (CVmean = 8%) was approximately twice that for Expression (CVmean = 4%). In authentic sets of replicate 2-DE gels (n = 5), the experimental variance confounded the software-induced variance to some extent. However, Expression still outperformed PDQuest, which exhibited software-induced variance as high as 25% of the total observed variance. Surprisingly, the complete omission of background subtraction algorithms resulted in the least amount of software-based variance. These data indicate that 2-DE gel analysis software constitutes a significant source of the variance observed in quantitative proteomics, and that the use of background subtraction algorithms can further increase the variance.

KW - PDQuest

KW - Phoretix 2D Expression

KW - Proteomics

KW - Quantitative two-dimensional gel electrophoresis

KW - Variance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=29244449816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=29244449816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/elps.200500253

DO - 10.1002/elps.200500253

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 4508

EP - 4520

JO - Electrophoresis

JF - Electrophoresis

SN - 0173-0835

IS - 23

ER -