Smoking, self-selection and absenteeism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

How much, if any, does smoking contribute to absenteeism? Separate samples of employed men and women are drawn from the 1986 wave of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) to answer this question. The 1986 wave is the most recent one with information on smoking. In the first analysis, single equation Tobit regressions are run explaining the absence rate. Independent variables include a binary smoking variable together with others for age, race, marital status, and so on. In the single equation models, smoking appeared to raise absence rates by 42 and 232 percent for women and men, respectively. In the second analysis, decomposition techniques, which also adjust for smoking and employment hazard rates, are applied to four separate samples of smokers, non-smokers, men, and women. The decomposition techniques lowered these differentials. Smoking appears to make a moderate contribution to absenteeism for men, but only a slight contribution for women. The decomposition suggests that it is the observed and unobserved personal characteristics of female smokers that account for most of the simple positive correlations between absenteeism and smoking among women found in the single equation models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)365-386
Number of pages22
JournalQuarterly Review of Economics and Finance
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Absenteeism
Self-selection
Smoking
Decomposition
Marital status
Hazard rate
Decomposition analysis
Personal characteristics
Panel study
Tobit regression
Income

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Finance

Cite this

Smoking, self-selection and absenteeism. / Leigh, J Paul.

In: Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 35, No. 4, 1995, p. 365-386.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{008cb90082c041f99c16b7e498d35af2,
title = "Smoking, self-selection and absenteeism",
abstract = "How much, if any, does smoking contribute to absenteeism? Separate samples of employed men and women are drawn from the 1986 wave of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) to answer this question. The 1986 wave is the most recent one with information on smoking. In the first analysis, single equation Tobit regressions are run explaining the absence rate. Independent variables include a binary smoking variable together with others for age, race, marital status, and so on. In the single equation models, smoking appeared to raise absence rates by 42 and 232 percent for women and men, respectively. In the second analysis, decomposition techniques, which also adjust for smoking and employment hazard rates, are applied to four separate samples of smokers, non-smokers, men, and women. The decomposition techniques lowered these differentials. Smoking appears to make a moderate contribution to absenteeism for men, but only a slight contribution for women. The decomposition suggests that it is the observed and unobserved personal characteristics of female smokers that account for most of the simple positive correlations between absenteeism and smoking among women found in the single equation models.",
author = "Leigh, {J Paul}",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1016/1062-9769(95)90046-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "365--386",
journal = "Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance",
issn = "1062-9769",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Smoking, self-selection and absenteeism

AU - Leigh, J Paul

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - How much, if any, does smoking contribute to absenteeism? Separate samples of employed men and women are drawn from the 1986 wave of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) to answer this question. The 1986 wave is the most recent one with information on smoking. In the first analysis, single equation Tobit regressions are run explaining the absence rate. Independent variables include a binary smoking variable together with others for age, race, marital status, and so on. In the single equation models, smoking appeared to raise absence rates by 42 and 232 percent for women and men, respectively. In the second analysis, decomposition techniques, which also adjust for smoking and employment hazard rates, are applied to four separate samples of smokers, non-smokers, men, and women. The decomposition techniques lowered these differentials. Smoking appears to make a moderate contribution to absenteeism for men, but only a slight contribution for women. The decomposition suggests that it is the observed and unobserved personal characteristics of female smokers that account for most of the simple positive correlations between absenteeism and smoking among women found in the single equation models.

AB - How much, if any, does smoking contribute to absenteeism? Separate samples of employed men and women are drawn from the 1986 wave of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) to answer this question. The 1986 wave is the most recent one with information on smoking. In the first analysis, single equation Tobit regressions are run explaining the absence rate. Independent variables include a binary smoking variable together with others for age, race, marital status, and so on. In the single equation models, smoking appeared to raise absence rates by 42 and 232 percent for women and men, respectively. In the second analysis, decomposition techniques, which also adjust for smoking and employment hazard rates, are applied to four separate samples of smokers, non-smokers, men, and women. The decomposition techniques lowered these differentials. Smoking appears to make a moderate contribution to absenteeism for men, but only a slight contribution for women. The decomposition suggests that it is the observed and unobserved personal characteristics of female smokers that account for most of the simple positive correlations between absenteeism and smoking among women found in the single equation models.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001474058&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001474058&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/1062-9769(95)90046-2

DO - 10.1016/1062-9769(95)90046-2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0001474058

VL - 35

SP - 365

EP - 386

JO - Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance

JF - Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance

SN - 1062-9769

IS - 4

ER -