Smoking as a risk factor for accident death: A meta-analysis of cohort studies

Bruce N. Leistikow, Daniel C. Martin, Jeffrey Jacobs, David M Rocke, Kyle Noderer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This meta-analysis discusses the consistency, strength, dose-response, independence, and generalizability of published cohort data on accident death relative risks in smokers. To locate data, three authors independently searched MEDLINE, and bibliographies of the pertinent studies found, for data which allowed estimation of an appropriate cigarette smoker accident death relative risk (and 95% confidence interval). Relative risks and dose-response were summarized by fixed effects and Poisson modeling, respectively. Four pertinent cohort studies including eight populations were located. Cigarette smoking predicted summary accident death relative risks of 1.51 (95% confidence interval 1.27-1.78) versus never smokers and 1.35 (1.17-1.57) versus ex-smokers. Summary dose-response trends were significant (P = 0.0000) versus never or least smoking referents. In individual studies, the smoking/accident death association persisted after adjustment or, in effect stratification, for age, race, sex, and occupation: occupation and time period; or numerous cardiac risk factors. This meta-analysis found significant, consistent, dose-response, often strong and independent (of age, race, and sex), prospective associations of smoking with accident death, internationally. Further studies and warnings of the smoking/accident death associations seem merited

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)397-405
Number of pages9
JournalAccident Analysis and Prevention
Volume32
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 2000

Fingerprint

Accidents
Meta-Analysis
smoking
accident
Cohort Studies
Smoking
death
Occupations
Tobacco Products
occupation
confidence
Confidence Intervals
Social Adjustment
Bibliographies
Bibliography
MEDLINE
bibliography
trend
Population

Keywords

  • Accident death
  • Meta-analysis
  • Risk factor
  • Smoking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemical Health and Safety
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Law
  • Safety Research
  • Transportation

Cite this

Leistikow, B. N., Martin, D. C., Jacobs, J., Rocke, D. M., & Noderer, K. (2000). Smoking as a risk factor for accident death: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 32(3), 397-405.

Smoking as a risk factor for accident death : A meta-analysis of cohort studies. / Leistikow, Bruce N.; Martin, Daniel C.; Jacobs, Jeffrey; Rocke, David M; Noderer, Kyle.

In: Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 32, No. 3, 05.2000, p. 397-405.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Leistikow, BN, Martin, DC, Jacobs, J, Rocke, DM & Noderer, K 2000, 'Smoking as a risk factor for accident death: A meta-analysis of cohort studies', Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 397-405.
Leistikow, Bruce N. ; Martin, Daniel C. ; Jacobs, Jeffrey ; Rocke, David M ; Noderer, Kyle. / Smoking as a risk factor for accident death : A meta-analysis of cohort studies. In: Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2000 ; Vol. 32, No. 3. pp. 397-405.
@article{d7f0f345ad534346bf03d9c2838143f8,
title = "Smoking as a risk factor for accident death: A meta-analysis of cohort studies",
abstract = "This meta-analysis discusses the consistency, strength, dose-response, independence, and generalizability of published cohort data on accident death relative risks in smokers. To locate data, three authors independently searched MEDLINE, and bibliographies of the pertinent studies found, for data which allowed estimation of an appropriate cigarette smoker accident death relative risk (and 95{\%} confidence interval). Relative risks and dose-response were summarized by fixed effects and Poisson modeling, respectively. Four pertinent cohort studies including eight populations were located. Cigarette smoking predicted summary accident death relative risks of 1.51 (95{\%} confidence interval 1.27-1.78) versus never smokers and 1.35 (1.17-1.57) versus ex-smokers. Summary dose-response trends were significant (P = 0.0000) versus never or least smoking referents. In individual studies, the smoking/accident death association persisted after adjustment or, in effect stratification, for age, race, sex, and occupation: occupation and time period; or numerous cardiac risk factors. This meta-analysis found significant, consistent, dose-response, often strong and independent (of age, race, and sex), prospective associations of smoking with accident death, internationally. Further studies and warnings of the smoking/accident death associations seem merited",
keywords = "Accident death, Meta-analysis, Risk factor, Smoking",
author = "Leistikow, {Bruce N.} and Martin, {Daniel C.} and Jeffrey Jacobs and Rocke, {David M} and Kyle Noderer",
year = "2000",
month = "5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "397--405",
journal = "Accident Analysis and Prevention",
issn = "0001-4575",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Smoking as a risk factor for accident death

T2 - A meta-analysis of cohort studies

AU - Leistikow, Bruce N.

AU - Martin, Daniel C.

AU - Jacobs, Jeffrey

AU - Rocke, David M

AU - Noderer, Kyle

PY - 2000/5

Y1 - 2000/5

N2 - This meta-analysis discusses the consistency, strength, dose-response, independence, and generalizability of published cohort data on accident death relative risks in smokers. To locate data, three authors independently searched MEDLINE, and bibliographies of the pertinent studies found, for data which allowed estimation of an appropriate cigarette smoker accident death relative risk (and 95% confidence interval). Relative risks and dose-response were summarized by fixed effects and Poisson modeling, respectively. Four pertinent cohort studies including eight populations were located. Cigarette smoking predicted summary accident death relative risks of 1.51 (95% confidence interval 1.27-1.78) versus never smokers and 1.35 (1.17-1.57) versus ex-smokers. Summary dose-response trends were significant (P = 0.0000) versus never or least smoking referents. In individual studies, the smoking/accident death association persisted after adjustment or, in effect stratification, for age, race, sex, and occupation: occupation and time period; or numerous cardiac risk factors. This meta-analysis found significant, consistent, dose-response, often strong and independent (of age, race, and sex), prospective associations of smoking with accident death, internationally. Further studies and warnings of the smoking/accident death associations seem merited

AB - This meta-analysis discusses the consistency, strength, dose-response, independence, and generalizability of published cohort data on accident death relative risks in smokers. To locate data, three authors independently searched MEDLINE, and bibliographies of the pertinent studies found, for data which allowed estimation of an appropriate cigarette smoker accident death relative risk (and 95% confidence interval). Relative risks and dose-response were summarized by fixed effects and Poisson modeling, respectively. Four pertinent cohort studies including eight populations were located. Cigarette smoking predicted summary accident death relative risks of 1.51 (95% confidence interval 1.27-1.78) versus never smokers and 1.35 (1.17-1.57) versus ex-smokers. Summary dose-response trends were significant (P = 0.0000) versus never or least smoking referents. In individual studies, the smoking/accident death association persisted after adjustment or, in effect stratification, for age, race, sex, and occupation: occupation and time period; or numerous cardiac risk factors. This meta-analysis found significant, consistent, dose-response, often strong and independent (of age, race, and sex), prospective associations of smoking with accident death, internationally. Further studies and warnings of the smoking/accident death associations seem merited

KW - Accident death

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Risk factor

KW - Smoking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034185344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034185344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10776858

AN - SCOPUS:0034185344

VL - 32

SP - 397

EP - 405

JO - Accident Analysis and Prevention

JF - Accident Analysis and Prevention

SN - 0001-4575

IS - 3

ER -