Smoke-free air laws and secondhand smoke exposure among nonsmoking youth

Melanie S. Dove, Douglas W. Dockery, Gregory N. Connolly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the association between smoke-free law coverage and cotinine among nonsmoking youth (3-19 years) with and without home secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure. METHODS: We used data from the 1999-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a cross-sectional survey designed to monitor the health and nutritional status of the US population. Serum cotinine levels were available for 11 486 nonsmoking youth from 117 survey locations. Each location was categorized into 1 of 3 groups indicating extensive, limited, and no coverage by a smoke-free law. Cotinine was analyzed both as a dichotomous (≥0.05 ng/mL) and as a continuous outcome. RESULTS: Among youth without home SHS exposure, those who were living in a county with extensive coverage of a smoke-free air law had an adjusted 0.61 times (95% confidence interval: 0.48-0.78) the prevalence of detectable cotinine and 0.57 (95% confidence interval: 0.41-0.79) times lower geometric mean compared with youth without a smoke-free air law. Among youth with home SHS exposure, youth with extensive coverage of a smoke-free air law had lower geometric mean cotinine compared with youth who were living in a county without a smoke-free air law, but these differences were no longer observed after adjustment for covariates. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that smoke-free laws are an effective strategy for reducing cotinine in youth without home SHS exposure; however, among youth with home SHS exposure, no benefit was detected.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)80-87
Number of pages8
JournalPediatrics
Volume126
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tobacco Smoke Pollution
Smoke
Cotinine
Air
Confidence Intervals
Nutrition Surveys
Nutritional Status
Health Status
Cross-Sectional Studies

Keywords

  • Children and adolescents
  • National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
  • Secondhand smoke
  • Tobacco control policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Smoke-free air laws and secondhand smoke exposure among nonsmoking youth. / Dove, Melanie S.; Dockery, Douglas W.; Connolly, Gregory N.

In: Pediatrics, Vol. 126, No. 1, 01.07.2010, p. 80-87.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dove, Melanie S. ; Dockery, Douglas W. ; Connolly, Gregory N. / Smoke-free air laws and secondhand smoke exposure among nonsmoking youth. In: Pediatrics. 2010 ; Vol. 126, No. 1. pp. 80-87.
@article{18436e3d60304e9290f2916dcefc579c,
title = "Smoke-free air laws and secondhand smoke exposure among nonsmoking youth",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: We investigated the association between smoke-free law coverage and cotinine among nonsmoking youth (3-19 years) with and without home secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure. METHODS: We used data from the 1999-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a cross-sectional survey designed to monitor the health and nutritional status of the US population. Serum cotinine levels were available for 11 486 nonsmoking youth from 117 survey locations. Each location was categorized into 1 of 3 groups indicating extensive, limited, and no coverage by a smoke-free law. Cotinine was analyzed both as a dichotomous (≥0.05 ng/mL) and as a continuous outcome. RESULTS: Among youth without home SHS exposure, those who were living in a county with extensive coverage of a smoke-free air law had an adjusted 0.61 times (95{\%} confidence interval: 0.48-0.78) the prevalence of detectable cotinine and 0.57 (95{\%} confidence interval: 0.41-0.79) times lower geometric mean compared with youth without a smoke-free air law. Among youth with home SHS exposure, youth with extensive coverage of a smoke-free air law had lower geometric mean cotinine compared with youth who were living in a county without a smoke-free air law, but these differences were no longer observed after adjustment for covariates. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that smoke-free laws are an effective strategy for reducing cotinine in youth without home SHS exposure; however, among youth with home SHS exposure, no benefit was detected.",
keywords = "Children and adolescents, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, Secondhand smoke, Tobacco control policy",
author = "Dove, {Melanie S.} and Dockery, {Douglas W.} and Connolly, {Gregory N.}",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1542/peds.2009-3462",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "126",
pages = "80--87",
journal = "Pediatrics",
issn = "0031-4005",
publisher = "American Academy of Pediatrics",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Smoke-free air laws and secondhand smoke exposure among nonsmoking youth

AU - Dove, Melanie S.

AU - Dockery, Douglas W.

AU - Connolly, Gregory N.

PY - 2010/7/1

Y1 - 2010/7/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: We investigated the association between smoke-free law coverage and cotinine among nonsmoking youth (3-19 years) with and without home secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure. METHODS: We used data from the 1999-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a cross-sectional survey designed to monitor the health and nutritional status of the US population. Serum cotinine levels were available for 11 486 nonsmoking youth from 117 survey locations. Each location was categorized into 1 of 3 groups indicating extensive, limited, and no coverage by a smoke-free law. Cotinine was analyzed both as a dichotomous (≥0.05 ng/mL) and as a continuous outcome. RESULTS: Among youth without home SHS exposure, those who were living in a county with extensive coverage of a smoke-free air law had an adjusted 0.61 times (95% confidence interval: 0.48-0.78) the prevalence of detectable cotinine and 0.57 (95% confidence interval: 0.41-0.79) times lower geometric mean compared with youth without a smoke-free air law. Among youth with home SHS exposure, youth with extensive coverage of a smoke-free air law had lower geometric mean cotinine compared with youth who were living in a county without a smoke-free air law, but these differences were no longer observed after adjustment for covariates. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that smoke-free laws are an effective strategy for reducing cotinine in youth without home SHS exposure; however, among youth with home SHS exposure, no benefit was detected.

AB - OBJECTIVES: We investigated the association between smoke-free law coverage and cotinine among nonsmoking youth (3-19 years) with and without home secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure. METHODS: We used data from the 1999-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a cross-sectional survey designed to monitor the health and nutritional status of the US population. Serum cotinine levels were available for 11 486 nonsmoking youth from 117 survey locations. Each location was categorized into 1 of 3 groups indicating extensive, limited, and no coverage by a smoke-free law. Cotinine was analyzed both as a dichotomous (≥0.05 ng/mL) and as a continuous outcome. RESULTS: Among youth without home SHS exposure, those who were living in a county with extensive coverage of a smoke-free air law had an adjusted 0.61 times (95% confidence interval: 0.48-0.78) the prevalence of detectable cotinine and 0.57 (95% confidence interval: 0.41-0.79) times lower geometric mean compared with youth without a smoke-free air law. Among youth with home SHS exposure, youth with extensive coverage of a smoke-free air law had lower geometric mean cotinine compared with youth who were living in a county without a smoke-free air law, but these differences were no longer observed after adjustment for covariates. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that smoke-free laws are an effective strategy for reducing cotinine in youth without home SHS exposure; however, among youth with home SHS exposure, no benefit was detected.

KW - Children and adolescents

KW - National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

KW - Secondhand smoke

KW - Tobacco control policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954367372&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954367372&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1542/peds.2009-3462

DO - 10.1542/peds.2009-3462

M3 - Article

C2 - 20530079

AN - SCOPUS:77954367372

VL - 126

SP - 80

EP - 87

JO - Pediatrics

JF - Pediatrics

SN - 0031-4005

IS - 1

ER -