Sled fixation for horizontal medial malleolus fractures

Adam M. Wegner, Philip R Wolinsky, Robin Z. Cheng, Michael A. Robbins, Tanya C. Garcia, Derek F. Amanatullah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Horizontal fractures of the medial malleolus occur through exertion of various rotational forces on the ankle, including supination­-external rotation, pronation-­external rotation, and pronation-abduction. Many methods of fixation are employed for these fractures, but the optimal fixation construct remains unclear. Methods Horizontal medial malleolus osteotomies were performed in synthetic distal tibiae and randomized into two fixation groups: 1) two parallel unicortical cancellous screws or 2) medial malleolar sled fixation. Specimens were subjected to offset axial tension loading and tracked using high-resolution video. Clinical failure was defined as 2 mm of articular displacement. Findings There were statistically significant increases in mean stiffness (127% higher, P = 0.0007) and mean force to clinical failure (52% higher, P = 0.0002) with the medial malleolar sled. The mean stiffness in offset tension loading was 232 (SD 83) N/mm for medial malleolar sled and 102 (SD 20) N/mm for parallel unicortical cancellous screws. The mean force to clinical failure was 595 (SD 112) N for medial malleolar sled and 392 (SD 34) N for unicortical screws. In addition, the medial malleolar sled demonstrated elastic recoil to pre-testing alignment while the unicortical screws did not. Interpretation Medial malleolar sled fixation was significantly stiffer and required more force to clinical failure than parallel unicortical cancellous screws. A medial malleolar sled requires more dissection to apply surgically, but provides significantly more initial fixation strength. Additionally, a medial malleolar sled acts like a tension band in its ability to capture comminuted fragments while being low profile enough to minimize soft tissue irritation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)92-96
Number of pages5
JournalClinical Biomechanics
Volume42
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017

Fingerprint

Ankle Fractures
Pronation
Supination
Fracture Fixation
Weight-Bearing
Osteotomy
Tibia
Ankle
Dissection
Joints

Keywords

  • Biomechanical study
  • Horizontal fracture
  • Internal fixation
  • Medial malleolar sled
  • Medial malleolus
  • Pronation-abduction
  • Pronation-external rotation
  • Supination-external rotation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Wegner, A. M., Wolinsky, P. R., Cheng, R. Z., Robbins, M. A., Garcia, T. C., & Amanatullah, D. F. (2017). Sled fixation for horizontal medial malleolus fractures. Clinical Biomechanics, 42, 92-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.01.011

Sled fixation for horizontal medial malleolus fractures. / Wegner, Adam M.; Wolinsky, Philip R; Cheng, Robin Z.; Robbins, Michael A.; Garcia, Tanya C.; Amanatullah, Derek F.

In: Clinical Biomechanics, Vol. 42, 01.02.2017, p. 92-96.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wegner, AM, Wolinsky, PR, Cheng, RZ, Robbins, MA, Garcia, TC & Amanatullah, DF 2017, 'Sled fixation for horizontal medial malleolus fractures', Clinical Biomechanics, vol. 42, pp. 92-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.01.011
Wegner, Adam M. ; Wolinsky, Philip R ; Cheng, Robin Z. ; Robbins, Michael A. ; Garcia, Tanya C. ; Amanatullah, Derek F. / Sled fixation for horizontal medial malleolus fractures. In: Clinical Biomechanics. 2017 ; Vol. 42. pp. 92-96.
@article{e8a98b17bb9a49518a0bb9934e1b1f06,
title = "Sled fixation for horizontal medial malleolus fractures",
abstract = "Background Horizontal fractures of the medial malleolus occur through exertion of various rotational forces on the ankle, including supination­-external rotation, pronation-­external rotation, and pronation-abduction. Many methods of fixation are employed for these fractures, but the optimal fixation construct remains unclear. Methods Horizontal medial malleolus osteotomies were performed in synthetic distal tibiae and randomized into two fixation groups: 1) two parallel unicortical cancellous screws or 2) medial malleolar sled fixation. Specimens were subjected to offset axial tension loading and tracked using high-resolution video. Clinical failure was defined as 2 mm of articular displacement. Findings There were statistically significant increases in mean stiffness (127{\%} higher, P = 0.0007) and mean force to clinical failure (52{\%} higher, P = 0.0002) with the medial malleolar sled. The mean stiffness in offset tension loading was 232 (SD 83) N/mm for medial malleolar sled and 102 (SD 20) N/mm for parallel unicortical cancellous screws. The mean force to clinical failure was 595 (SD 112) N for medial malleolar sled and 392 (SD 34) N for unicortical screws. In addition, the medial malleolar sled demonstrated elastic recoil to pre-testing alignment while the unicortical screws did not. Interpretation Medial malleolar sled fixation was significantly stiffer and required more force to clinical failure than parallel unicortical cancellous screws. A medial malleolar sled requires more dissection to apply surgically, but provides significantly more initial fixation strength. Additionally, a medial malleolar sled acts like a tension band in its ability to capture comminuted fragments while being low profile enough to minimize soft tissue irritation.",
keywords = "Biomechanical study, Horizontal fracture, Internal fixation, Medial malleolar sled, Medial malleolus, Pronation-abduction, Pronation-external rotation, Supination-external rotation",
author = "Wegner, {Adam M.} and Wolinsky, {Philip R} and Cheng, {Robin Z.} and Robbins, {Michael A.} and Garcia, {Tanya C.} and Amanatullah, {Derek F.}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.01.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "92--96",
journal = "Clinical Biomechanics",
issn = "0268-0033",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sled fixation for horizontal medial malleolus fractures

AU - Wegner, Adam M.

AU - Wolinsky, Philip R

AU - Cheng, Robin Z.

AU - Robbins, Michael A.

AU - Garcia, Tanya C.

AU - Amanatullah, Derek F.

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Background Horizontal fractures of the medial malleolus occur through exertion of various rotational forces on the ankle, including supination­-external rotation, pronation-­external rotation, and pronation-abduction. Many methods of fixation are employed for these fractures, but the optimal fixation construct remains unclear. Methods Horizontal medial malleolus osteotomies were performed in synthetic distal tibiae and randomized into two fixation groups: 1) two parallel unicortical cancellous screws or 2) medial malleolar sled fixation. Specimens were subjected to offset axial tension loading and tracked using high-resolution video. Clinical failure was defined as 2 mm of articular displacement. Findings There were statistically significant increases in mean stiffness (127% higher, P = 0.0007) and mean force to clinical failure (52% higher, P = 0.0002) with the medial malleolar sled. The mean stiffness in offset tension loading was 232 (SD 83) N/mm for medial malleolar sled and 102 (SD 20) N/mm for parallel unicortical cancellous screws. The mean force to clinical failure was 595 (SD 112) N for medial malleolar sled and 392 (SD 34) N for unicortical screws. In addition, the medial malleolar sled demonstrated elastic recoil to pre-testing alignment while the unicortical screws did not. Interpretation Medial malleolar sled fixation was significantly stiffer and required more force to clinical failure than parallel unicortical cancellous screws. A medial malleolar sled requires more dissection to apply surgically, but provides significantly more initial fixation strength. Additionally, a medial malleolar sled acts like a tension band in its ability to capture comminuted fragments while being low profile enough to minimize soft tissue irritation.

AB - Background Horizontal fractures of the medial malleolus occur through exertion of various rotational forces on the ankle, including supination­-external rotation, pronation-­external rotation, and pronation-abduction. Many methods of fixation are employed for these fractures, but the optimal fixation construct remains unclear. Methods Horizontal medial malleolus osteotomies were performed in synthetic distal tibiae and randomized into two fixation groups: 1) two parallel unicortical cancellous screws or 2) medial malleolar sled fixation. Specimens were subjected to offset axial tension loading and tracked using high-resolution video. Clinical failure was defined as 2 mm of articular displacement. Findings There were statistically significant increases in mean stiffness (127% higher, P = 0.0007) and mean force to clinical failure (52% higher, P = 0.0002) with the medial malleolar sled. The mean stiffness in offset tension loading was 232 (SD 83) N/mm for medial malleolar sled and 102 (SD 20) N/mm for parallel unicortical cancellous screws. The mean force to clinical failure was 595 (SD 112) N for medial malleolar sled and 392 (SD 34) N for unicortical screws. In addition, the medial malleolar sled demonstrated elastic recoil to pre-testing alignment while the unicortical screws did not. Interpretation Medial malleolar sled fixation was significantly stiffer and required more force to clinical failure than parallel unicortical cancellous screws. A medial malleolar sled requires more dissection to apply surgically, but provides significantly more initial fixation strength. Additionally, a medial malleolar sled acts like a tension band in its ability to capture comminuted fragments while being low profile enough to minimize soft tissue irritation.

KW - Biomechanical study

KW - Horizontal fracture

KW - Internal fixation

KW - Medial malleolar sled

KW - Medial malleolus

KW - Pronation-abduction

KW - Pronation-external rotation

KW - Supination-external rotation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009919305&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009919305&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.01.011

DO - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.01.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 28119205

AN - SCOPUS:85009919305

VL - 42

SP - 92

EP - 96

JO - Clinical Biomechanics

JF - Clinical Biomechanics

SN - 0268-0033

ER -