Short-interval follow-up mammography versus immediate core biopsy of benign breast lesions: Assessment of patient stress

Karen K Lindfors, Jacqueline O'Connor, Curt R. Acredolo, Steven E. Liston

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The stress experienced by women undergoing surveillance mammography for benign lesions was compared with that experienced by women undergoing core biopsy of benign lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective survey was mailed to women in whom were diagnosed breast abnormalities that were likely to be benign and that were stable at short- interval follow-up mammography (n = 174) or in whom a core biopsy of the breast was performed, with benign findings (n = 116). The survey included questions about stress related to the diagnostic experience as well as questions about who advised the women of the results of their breast imaging sideways and about the information provided. RESULTS. Eighty eligible surveys were received from the women who underwent short-interval follow-up mammography, and 58 surveys were received from the women who underwent biopsies. The self-reported overall stress experienced by the women who underwent core biopsies was significantly greater (p < .001) than that reported by the group who were followed up with mammography. The level of anxiety was not affected by the patient's perception of the probability that the lesion represented carcinoma. We found no significant differences in stress between women who discussed their mammogram results with radiologist and women who were notified by their primary care provider. CONCLUSION. Short-interval follow-up mammography continues to be acceptable for the evaluation of lesions that are probably benign, even when patient anxiety is considered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)55-58
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume171
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jul 1998

Fingerprint

Mammography
Breast
Biopsy
Anxiety
Primary Health Care
Carcinoma
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Short-interval follow-up mammography versus immediate core biopsy of benign breast lesions : Assessment of patient stress. / Lindfors, Karen K; O'Connor, Jacqueline; Acredolo, Curt R.; Liston, Steven E.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 171, No. 1, 07.1998, p. 55-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f9f8da0e6a654d758922ef037cae36b8,
title = "Short-interval follow-up mammography versus immediate core biopsy of benign breast lesions: Assessment of patient stress",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE. The stress experienced by women undergoing surveillance mammography for benign lesions was compared with that experienced by women undergoing core biopsy of benign lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective survey was mailed to women in whom were diagnosed breast abnormalities that were likely to be benign and that were stable at short- interval follow-up mammography (n = 174) or in whom a core biopsy of the breast was performed, with benign findings (n = 116). The survey included questions about stress related to the diagnostic experience as well as questions about who advised the women of the results of their breast imaging sideways and about the information provided. RESULTS. Eighty eligible surveys were received from the women who underwent short-interval follow-up mammography, and 58 surveys were received from the women who underwent biopsies. The self-reported overall stress experienced by the women who underwent core biopsies was significantly greater (p < .001) than that reported by the group who were followed up with mammography. The level of anxiety was not affected by the patient's perception of the probability that the lesion represented carcinoma. We found no significant differences in stress between women who discussed their mammogram results with radiologist and women who were notified by their primary care provider. CONCLUSION. Short-interval follow-up mammography continues to be acceptable for the evaluation of lesions that are probably benign, even when patient anxiety is considered.",
author = "Lindfors, {Karen K} and Jacqueline O'Connor and Acredolo, {Curt R.} and Liston, {Steven E.}",
year = "1998",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "171",
pages = "55--58",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Short-interval follow-up mammography versus immediate core biopsy of benign breast lesions

T2 - Assessment of patient stress

AU - Lindfors, Karen K

AU - O'Connor, Jacqueline

AU - Acredolo, Curt R.

AU - Liston, Steven E.

PY - 1998/7

Y1 - 1998/7

N2 - OBJECTIVE. The stress experienced by women undergoing surveillance mammography for benign lesions was compared with that experienced by women undergoing core biopsy of benign lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective survey was mailed to women in whom were diagnosed breast abnormalities that were likely to be benign and that were stable at short- interval follow-up mammography (n = 174) or in whom a core biopsy of the breast was performed, with benign findings (n = 116). The survey included questions about stress related to the diagnostic experience as well as questions about who advised the women of the results of their breast imaging sideways and about the information provided. RESULTS. Eighty eligible surveys were received from the women who underwent short-interval follow-up mammography, and 58 surveys were received from the women who underwent biopsies. The self-reported overall stress experienced by the women who underwent core biopsies was significantly greater (p < .001) than that reported by the group who were followed up with mammography. The level of anxiety was not affected by the patient's perception of the probability that the lesion represented carcinoma. We found no significant differences in stress between women who discussed their mammogram results with radiologist and women who were notified by their primary care provider. CONCLUSION. Short-interval follow-up mammography continues to be acceptable for the evaluation of lesions that are probably benign, even when patient anxiety is considered.

AB - OBJECTIVE. The stress experienced by women undergoing surveillance mammography for benign lesions was compared with that experienced by women undergoing core biopsy of benign lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective survey was mailed to women in whom were diagnosed breast abnormalities that were likely to be benign and that were stable at short- interval follow-up mammography (n = 174) or in whom a core biopsy of the breast was performed, with benign findings (n = 116). The survey included questions about stress related to the diagnostic experience as well as questions about who advised the women of the results of their breast imaging sideways and about the information provided. RESULTS. Eighty eligible surveys were received from the women who underwent short-interval follow-up mammography, and 58 surveys were received from the women who underwent biopsies. The self-reported overall stress experienced by the women who underwent core biopsies was significantly greater (p < .001) than that reported by the group who were followed up with mammography. The level of anxiety was not affected by the patient's perception of the probability that the lesion represented carcinoma. We found no significant differences in stress between women who discussed their mammogram results with radiologist and women who were notified by their primary care provider. CONCLUSION. Short-interval follow-up mammography continues to be acceptable for the evaluation of lesions that are probably benign, even when patient anxiety is considered.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031832006&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031832006&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9648763

AN - SCOPUS:0031832006

VL - 171

SP - 55

EP - 58

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 1

ER -