Sexual, marital, and social impact of a man's perceived infertility diagnosis

James F. Smith, Thomas J. Walsh, Alan W Shindel, Paul J. Turek, Holly Wing, Lauri Pasch, Patricia P. Katz, Nancy Adler, Mary Croughan, Steven Gregorich, Susan G. Millstein, Robert Nachtigall, Jonathan Showstack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

78 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction. Male factor infertility is a relatively common problem. This diagnosis may increase sexual, marital, and relationship strain in male partners of infertile couples. Aim. To measure the personal, social, sexual, and marital impacts of a male factor infertility diagnosis among men in couples evaluated for infertility. Methods. Cross-sectional analysis of 357 men in infertile couples from eight academic and community-based fertility clinics. Participants completed written surveys and face-to-face and telephone interviews at study enrollment. This interview queried each participant's perception of their infertility etiology to determine the primary study exposure (i.e., male factor only, male and female factors, female factor only, unknown). Main Outcome Measures. Personal Impact, Social Impact, Marital Impact, and Sexual Impact scales. Results. Among the 357 men, no male factor was reported in 47%, isolated male factor was present in 12%, combined male and female factors were present in 16%, and unexplained infertility was present in 25% of couples. Male factor infertility was independently associated with worse Sexual (mean 39 vs. 30, standard deviation [SD]2.7, P = 0.004) and Personal (mean 37 vs. 29, SD 3.8, P = 0.04) Impact scores relative to men in couples without male factor infertility. These differences remained statistically significant after controlling for male age, partner age, race, religion, educational level, employment status, prior pregnancy, duration of infertility, and prior paternity. Conclusions. Male partners in couples who perceive isolated male factor infertility have a lower sexual and personal quality of life compared with male partners of couples without perceived male factor infertility. Social strain is highest among couples without a clear etiology for infertility. These findings highlight the clinically significant negative sexual, personal, and social strains of a perceived infertility diagnosis for men.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2505-2515
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Sexual Medicine
Volume6
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Social Change
Infertility
Male Infertility
Interviews
Paternity
Religion
Marriage
Fertility
Cross-Sectional Studies
Quality of Life
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Pregnancy

Keywords

  • Epidemiology
  • Infertile Couples
  • Male Infertility
  • Sexual Dysfunction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Sexual, marital, and social impact of a man's perceived infertility diagnosis. / Smith, James F.; Walsh, Thomas J.; Shindel, Alan W; Turek, Paul J.; Wing, Holly; Pasch, Lauri; Katz, Patricia P.; Adler, Nancy; Croughan, Mary; Gregorich, Steven; Millstein, Susan G.; Nachtigall, Robert; Showstack, Jonathan.

In: Journal of Sexual Medicine, Vol. 6, No. 9, 2009, p. 2505-2515.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, JF, Walsh, TJ, Shindel, AW, Turek, PJ, Wing, H, Pasch, L, Katz, PP, Adler, N, Croughan, M, Gregorich, S, Millstein, SG, Nachtigall, R & Showstack, J 2009, 'Sexual, marital, and social impact of a man's perceived infertility diagnosis', Journal of Sexual Medicine, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 2505-2515. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01383.x
Smith, James F. ; Walsh, Thomas J. ; Shindel, Alan W ; Turek, Paul J. ; Wing, Holly ; Pasch, Lauri ; Katz, Patricia P. ; Adler, Nancy ; Croughan, Mary ; Gregorich, Steven ; Millstein, Susan G. ; Nachtigall, Robert ; Showstack, Jonathan. / Sexual, marital, and social impact of a man's perceived infertility diagnosis. In: Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2009 ; Vol. 6, No. 9. pp. 2505-2515.
@article{a8d812c3bb2648e9a6ffb21be905efc7,
title = "Sexual, marital, and social impact of a man's perceived infertility diagnosis",
abstract = "Introduction. Male factor infertility is a relatively common problem. This diagnosis may increase sexual, marital, and relationship strain in male partners of infertile couples. Aim. To measure the personal, social, sexual, and marital impacts of a male factor infertility diagnosis among men in couples evaluated for infertility. Methods. Cross-sectional analysis of 357 men in infertile couples from eight academic and community-based fertility clinics. Participants completed written surveys and face-to-face and telephone interviews at study enrollment. This interview queried each participant's perception of their infertility etiology to determine the primary study exposure (i.e., male factor only, male and female factors, female factor only, unknown). Main Outcome Measures. Personal Impact, Social Impact, Marital Impact, and Sexual Impact scales. Results. Among the 357 men, no male factor was reported in 47{\%}, isolated male factor was present in 12{\%}, combined male and female factors were present in 16{\%}, and unexplained infertility was present in 25{\%} of couples. Male factor infertility was independently associated with worse Sexual (mean 39 vs. 30, standard deviation [SD]2.7, P = 0.004) and Personal (mean 37 vs. 29, SD 3.8, P = 0.04) Impact scores relative to men in couples without male factor infertility. These differences remained statistically significant after controlling for male age, partner age, race, religion, educational level, employment status, prior pregnancy, duration of infertility, and prior paternity. Conclusions. Male partners in couples who perceive isolated male factor infertility have a lower sexual and personal quality of life compared with male partners of couples without perceived male factor infertility. Social strain is highest among couples without a clear etiology for infertility. These findings highlight the clinically significant negative sexual, personal, and social strains of a perceived infertility diagnosis for men.",
keywords = "Epidemiology, Infertile Couples, Male Infertility, Sexual Dysfunction",
author = "Smith, {James F.} and Walsh, {Thomas J.} and Shindel, {Alan W} and Turek, {Paul J.} and Holly Wing and Lauri Pasch and Katz, {Patricia P.} and Nancy Adler and Mary Croughan and Steven Gregorich and Millstein, {Susan G.} and Robert Nachtigall and Jonathan Showstack",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01383.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "2505--2515",
journal = "Journal of Sexual Medicine",
issn = "1743-6095",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sexual, marital, and social impact of a man's perceived infertility diagnosis

AU - Smith, James F.

AU - Walsh, Thomas J.

AU - Shindel, Alan W

AU - Turek, Paul J.

AU - Wing, Holly

AU - Pasch, Lauri

AU - Katz, Patricia P.

AU - Adler, Nancy

AU - Croughan, Mary

AU - Gregorich, Steven

AU - Millstein, Susan G.

AU - Nachtigall, Robert

AU - Showstack, Jonathan

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Introduction. Male factor infertility is a relatively common problem. This diagnosis may increase sexual, marital, and relationship strain in male partners of infertile couples. Aim. To measure the personal, social, sexual, and marital impacts of a male factor infertility diagnosis among men in couples evaluated for infertility. Methods. Cross-sectional analysis of 357 men in infertile couples from eight academic and community-based fertility clinics. Participants completed written surveys and face-to-face and telephone interviews at study enrollment. This interview queried each participant's perception of their infertility etiology to determine the primary study exposure (i.e., male factor only, male and female factors, female factor only, unknown). Main Outcome Measures. Personal Impact, Social Impact, Marital Impact, and Sexual Impact scales. Results. Among the 357 men, no male factor was reported in 47%, isolated male factor was present in 12%, combined male and female factors were present in 16%, and unexplained infertility was present in 25% of couples. Male factor infertility was independently associated with worse Sexual (mean 39 vs. 30, standard deviation [SD]2.7, P = 0.004) and Personal (mean 37 vs. 29, SD 3.8, P = 0.04) Impact scores relative to men in couples without male factor infertility. These differences remained statistically significant after controlling for male age, partner age, race, religion, educational level, employment status, prior pregnancy, duration of infertility, and prior paternity. Conclusions. Male partners in couples who perceive isolated male factor infertility have a lower sexual and personal quality of life compared with male partners of couples without perceived male factor infertility. Social strain is highest among couples without a clear etiology for infertility. These findings highlight the clinically significant negative sexual, personal, and social strains of a perceived infertility diagnosis for men.

AB - Introduction. Male factor infertility is a relatively common problem. This diagnosis may increase sexual, marital, and relationship strain in male partners of infertile couples. Aim. To measure the personal, social, sexual, and marital impacts of a male factor infertility diagnosis among men in couples evaluated for infertility. Methods. Cross-sectional analysis of 357 men in infertile couples from eight academic and community-based fertility clinics. Participants completed written surveys and face-to-face and telephone interviews at study enrollment. This interview queried each participant's perception of their infertility etiology to determine the primary study exposure (i.e., male factor only, male and female factors, female factor only, unknown). Main Outcome Measures. Personal Impact, Social Impact, Marital Impact, and Sexual Impact scales. Results. Among the 357 men, no male factor was reported in 47%, isolated male factor was present in 12%, combined male and female factors were present in 16%, and unexplained infertility was present in 25% of couples. Male factor infertility was independently associated with worse Sexual (mean 39 vs. 30, standard deviation [SD]2.7, P = 0.004) and Personal (mean 37 vs. 29, SD 3.8, P = 0.04) Impact scores relative to men in couples without male factor infertility. These differences remained statistically significant after controlling for male age, partner age, race, religion, educational level, employment status, prior pregnancy, duration of infertility, and prior paternity. Conclusions. Male partners in couples who perceive isolated male factor infertility have a lower sexual and personal quality of life compared with male partners of couples without perceived male factor infertility. Social strain is highest among couples without a clear etiology for infertility. These findings highlight the clinically significant negative sexual, personal, and social strains of a perceived infertility diagnosis for men.

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Infertile Couples

KW - Male Infertility

KW - Sexual Dysfunction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69949096678&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69949096678&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01383.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01383.x

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 2505

EP - 2515

JO - Journal of Sexual Medicine

JF - Journal of Sexual Medicine

SN - 1743-6095

IS - 9

ER -