Sex differences in language processing: Functional MRI methodological considerations

Greg S. Harrington, Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the influence of both analysis methods and tasks used in the determination of language related sex differences. Previous neuroimaging studies evaluating sex differences in language processing have been inconsistent. Materials and Methods: The current study compared FMRI activation between men and women on a variety of language tasks using different types of individual (laterality and activation volume) and group analyses to evaluate the effects of task and methodology. Forty subjects completed five language tasks, 19 men and 21 women. Results: Group analyses revealed greater activation for men compared with women in the left pars orbitalis while women showed greater activation within the right insula. With individual analyses, there were no significant sex differences in laterality using two large regions of interest (ROIs) covering the inferior frontal and temporoparietal regions; however, there were significant sex effects within small, specific ROIs (insula, middle temporal and pars opercularis, triangularis, and orbitalis). When holding the task constant, some methods (for example different ROIs within individual analyses) revealed sex differences while others methods did not, indicating a dependence on methodology. Conclusion: The results partly explain why FMRI studies evaluating language related sex effects have been inconsistent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1221-1228
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume27
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2008

Fingerprint

Sex Characteristics
Language
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Neuroimaging
Broca Area

Keywords

  • Brain mapping
  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging
  • Gender
  • Language
  • Sex

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Sex differences in language processing : Functional MRI methodological considerations. / Harrington, Greg S.; Tomaszewski Farias, Sarah E.

In: Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol. 27, No. 6, 06.2008, p. 1221-1228.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{356391c0da2948f5bdfcaf206076deba,
title = "Sex differences in language processing: Functional MRI methodological considerations",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the influence of both analysis methods and tasks used in the determination of language related sex differences. Previous neuroimaging studies evaluating sex differences in language processing have been inconsistent. Materials and Methods: The current study compared FMRI activation between men and women on a variety of language tasks using different types of individual (laterality and activation volume) and group analyses to evaluate the effects of task and methodology. Forty subjects completed five language tasks, 19 men and 21 women. Results: Group analyses revealed greater activation for men compared with women in the left pars orbitalis while women showed greater activation within the right insula. With individual analyses, there were no significant sex differences in laterality using two large regions of interest (ROIs) covering the inferior frontal and temporoparietal regions; however, there were significant sex effects within small, specific ROIs (insula, middle temporal and pars opercularis, triangularis, and orbitalis). When holding the task constant, some methods (for example different ROIs within individual analyses) revealed sex differences while others methods did not, indicating a dependence on methodology. Conclusion: The results partly explain why FMRI studies evaluating language related sex effects have been inconsistent.",
keywords = "Brain mapping, Functional magnetic resonance imaging, Gender, Language, Sex",
author = "Harrington, {Greg S.} and {Tomaszewski Farias}, {Sarah E}",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1002/jmri.21374",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "1221--1228",
journal = "Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging",
issn = "1053-1807",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sex differences in language processing

T2 - Functional MRI methodological considerations

AU - Harrington, Greg S.

AU - Tomaszewski Farias, Sarah E

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the influence of both analysis methods and tasks used in the determination of language related sex differences. Previous neuroimaging studies evaluating sex differences in language processing have been inconsistent. Materials and Methods: The current study compared FMRI activation between men and women on a variety of language tasks using different types of individual (laterality and activation volume) and group analyses to evaluate the effects of task and methodology. Forty subjects completed five language tasks, 19 men and 21 women. Results: Group analyses revealed greater activation for men compared with women in the left pars orbitalis while women showed greater activation within the right insula. With individual analyses, there were no significant sex differences in laterality using two large regions of interest (ROIs) covering the inferior frontal and temporoparietal regions; however, there were significant sex effects within small, specific ROIs (insula, middle temporal and pars opercularis, triangularis, and orbitalis). When holding the task constant, some methods (for example different ROIs within individual analyses) revealed sex differences while others methods did not, indicating a dependence on methodology. Conclusion: The results partly explain why FMRI studies evaluating language related sex effects have been inconsistent.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the influence of both analysis methods and tasks used in the determination of language related sex differences. Previous neuroimaging studies evaluating sex differences in language processing have been inconsistent. Materials and Methods: The current study compared FMRI activation between men and women on a variety of language tasks using different types of individual (laterality and activation volume) and group analyses to evaluate the effects of task and methodology. Forty subjects completed five language tasks, 19 men and 21 women. Results: Group analyses revealed greater activation for men compared with women in the left pars orbitalis while women showed greater activation within the right insula. With individual analyses, there were no significant sex differences in laterality using two large regions of interest (ROIs) covering the inferior frontal and temporoparietal regions; however, there were significant sex effects within small, specific ROIs (insula, middle temporal and pars opercularis, triangularis, and orbitalis). When holding the task constant, some methods (for example different ROIs within individual analyses) revealed sex differences while others methods did not, indicating a dependence on methodology. Conclusion: The results partly explain why FMRI studies evaluating language related sex effects have been inconsistent.

KW - Brain mapping

KW - Functional magnetic resonance imaging

KW - Gender

KW - Language

KW - Sex

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44449175597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44449175597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jmri.21374

DO - 10.1002/jmri.21374

M3 - Article

C2 - 18504739

AN - SCOPUS:44449175597

VL - 27

SP - 1221

EP - 1228

JO - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

JF - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

SN - 1053-1807

IS - 6

ER -