Sex and electrode configuration in transcranial electrical stimulation

Michael J. Russell, Theodore A. Goodman, Joseph M. Visse, Laurel A Beckett, Naomi Saito, Bruce G Lyeth, Gregg H. Recanzone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) can be an effective non-invasive neuromodulation procedure. Unfortunately, the considerable variation in reported treatment outcomes, both within and between studies, has made the procedure unreliable for many applications. To determine if individual differences in cranium morphology and tissue conductivity can account for some of this variation, the electrical density at two cortical locations (temporal and frontal) directly under scalp electrodes was modeled using a validated MRI modeling procedure in 23 subjects (12 males and 11 females). Three different electrode configurations (non-cephalic, bi-cranial, and ring) commonly used in tES were modeled at three current intensities (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mA). The aims were to assess the effects of configuration and current intensity on relative current received at a cortical brain target directly under the stimulating electrode and to characterize individual variation. The different electrode configurations resulted in up to a ninefold difference in mean current densities delivered to the brains. The ring configuration delivered the least current and the non-cephalic the most. Female subjects showed much less current to the brain than male subjects. Individual differences in the current received and differences in electrode configurations may account for significant variability in current delivered and, thus, potentially a significant portion of reported variation in clinical outcomes at two commonly targeted regions of the brain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number147
JournalFrontiers in Psychiatry
Volume8
Issue numberAUG
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 14 2017

Fingerprint

Electrodes
Brain
Individuality
Scalp
Skull
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Keywords

  • 10-20 system
  • Alternating current stimulation
  • Direct current stimulation
  • Electrical targeting
  • High density stimulation
  • MRI modeling
  • Transcranial electrical stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Sex and electrode configuration in transcranial electrical stimulation. / Russell, Michael J.; Goodman, Theodore A.; Visse, Joseph M.; Beckett, Laurel A; Saito, Naomi; Lyeth, Bruce G; Recanzone, Gregg H.

In: Frontiers in Psychiatry, Vol. 8, No. AUG, 147, 14.08.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Russell, Michael J. ; Goodman, Theodore A. ; Visse, Joseph M. ; Beckett, Laurel A ; Saito, Naomi ; Lyeth, Bruce G ; Recanzone, Gregg H. / Sex and electrode configuration in transcranial electrical stimulation. In: Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2017 ; Vol. 8, No. AUG.
@article{e53af3528dc74706b26490aca57cb1fc,
title = "Sex and electrode configuration in transcranial electrical stimulation",
abstract = "Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) can be an effective non-invasive neuromodulation procedure. Unfortunately, the considerable variation in reported treatment outcomes, both within and between studies, has made the procedure unreliable for many applications. To determine if individual differences in cranium morphology and tissue conductivity can account for some of this variation, the electrical density at two cortical locations (temporal and frontal) directly under scalp electrodes was modeled using a validated MRI modeling procedure in 23 subjects (12 males and 11 females). Three different electrode configurations (non-cephalic, bi-cranial, and ring) commonly used in tES were modeled at three current intensities (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mA). The aims were to assess the effects of configuration and current intensity on relative current received at a cortical brain target directly under the stimulating electrode and to characterize individual variation. The different electrode configurations resulted in up to a ninefold difference in mean current densities delivered to the brains. The ring configuration delivered the least current and the non-cephalic the most. Female subjects showed much less current to the brain than male subjects. Individual differences in the current received and differences in electrode configurations may account for significant variability in current delivered and, thus, potentially a significant portion of reported variation in clinical outcomes at two commonly targeted regions of the brain.",
keywords = "10-20 system, Alternating current stimulation, Direct current stimulation, Electrical targeting, High density stimulation, MRI modeling, Transcranial electrical stimulation",
author = "Russell, {Michael J.} and Goodman, {Theodore A.} and Visse, {Joseph M.} and Beckett, {Laurel A} and Naomi Saito and Lyeth, {Bruce G} and Recanzone, {Gregg H.}",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "14",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00147",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychiatry",
issn = "1664-0640",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",
number = "AUG",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sex and electrode configuration in transcranial electrical stimulation

AU - Russell, Michael J.

AU - Goodman, Theodore A.

AU - Visse, Joseph M.

AU - Beckett, Laurel A

AU - Saito, Naomi

AU - Lyeth, Bruce G

AU - Recanzone, Gregg H.

PY - 2017/8/14

Y1 - 2017/8/14

N2 - Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) can be an effective non-invasive neuromodulation procedure. Unfortunately, the considerable variation in reported treatment outcomes, both within and between studies, has made the procedure unreliable for many applications. To determine if individual differences in cranium morphology and tissue conductivity can account for some of this variation, the electrical density at two cortical locations (temporal and frontal) directly under scalp electrodes was modeled using a validated MRI modeling procedure in 23 subjects (12 males and 11 females). Three different electrode configurations (non-cephalic, bi-cranial, and ring) commonly used in tES were modeled at three current intensities (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mA). The aims were to assess the effects of configuration and current intensity on relative current received at a cortical brain target directly under the stimulating electrode and to characterize individual variation. The different electrode configurations resulted in up to a ninefold difference in mean current densities delivered to the brains. The ring configuration delivered the least current and the non-cephalic the most. Female subjects showed much less current to the brain than male subjects. Individual differences in the current received and differences in electrode configurations may account for significant variability in current delivered and, thus, potentially a significant portion of reported variation in clinical outcomes at two commonly targeted regions of the brain.

AB - Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) can be an effective non-invasive neuromodulation procedure. Unfortunately, the considerable variation in reported treatment outcomes, both within and between studies, has made the procedure unreliable for many applications. To determine if individual differences in cranium morphology and tissue conductivity can account for some of this variation, the electrical density at two cortical locations (temporal and frontal) directly under scalp electrodes was modeled using a validated MRI modeling procedure in 23 subjects (12 males and 11 females). Three different electrode configurations (non-cephalic, bi-cranial, and ring) commonly used in tES were modeled at three current intensities (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mA). The aims were to assess the effects of configuration and current intensity on relative current received at a cortical brain target directly under the stimulating electrode and to characterize individual variation. The different electrode configurations resulted in up to a ninefold difference in mean current densities delivered to the brains. The ring configuration delivered the least current and the non-cephalic the most. Female subjects showed much less current to the brain than male subjects. Individual differences in the current received and differences in electrode configurations may account for significant variability in current delivered and, thus, potentially a significant portion of reported variation in clinical outcomes at two commonly targeted regions of the brain.

KW - 10-20 system

KW - Alternating current stimulation

KW - Direct current stimulation

KW - Electrical targeting

KW - High density stimulation

KW - MRI modeling

KW - Transcranial electrical stimulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028586330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028586330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00147

DO - 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00147

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - Frontiers in Psychiatry

JF - Frontiers in Psychiatry

SN - 1664-0640

IS - AUG

M1 - 147

ER -