Sensitivity of radiographic evaluation of radio-ulnar incongruence in the dog in vitro

David R. Mason, Kurt S. Schulz, Valerie F. Samii, Yukihiro Fujita, William J. Hornof, Eric J. Herrgesell, Craig D. Long, Joe P. Morgan, Philip H Kass

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective - To determine the sensitivity and specificity of radiographic evaluation of radio-ulnar incongruence in canine elbow joints in vitro. Study Design - Radiographic evaluation of induced radio-ulnar incongruence in canine cadaveric forelimbs by radiologists blinded to study design. Sample Population - Six cadaveric canine left forelimbs. Methods - Extended lateral, 90° flexed lateral, and cranio-caudal projections were taken of the elbow joint of six cadaveric canine forelimbs. A four-pin, type I external skeletal fixator (ESF) with a linear motor side bar was attached to the medial aspect of the radius, and a 2-cm segment of bone was removed from the mid-diaphysis. A 3.5-mm cortical bone screw placed from the medial to lateral styloid processes prevented relative movement between the distal radius and ulna during radial shortening. The ESF was used to progressively shorten the radius in increments of 0.5 mm to a total of 4 mm. The three radiographic projections were repeated after each incremental change of length. After the study, each elbow joint was disarticulated to confirm the presence of a step defect. The original radiographs and three copies were randomized and then evaluated by four radiologists blinded to the study design. Radiologists were asked to evaluate whether the joint was normal or abnormal and if there was evidence of radio-ulnar incongruence. The ability of each radiologist to correctly identify congruent elbows (specificity) and incongruent elbows (sensitivity) was calculated. Results - The median specificity was 86% using the lateral projection and 82% using the cranio-caudal projection. The median sensitivities using the lateral and cranio-caudal radiographic projections were 78% and 79%, respectively. The degree of radial shortening required for individual radiologists to achieve a sensitivity of 90% ranged from 1.5 mm to greater than 4 mm. Clinical Relevance - Standard radiographic evaluation for radio-ulnar incongruence in the dog may be associated with relatively poor sensitivity and specificity. Invasive surgical procedures and screening programs that rely on radiographic diagnosis of radio-ulnar incongruence should be discouraged until a more reliable method of diagnosis of this type of elbow joint incongruence is available.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)125-132
Number of pages8
JournalVeterinary Surgery
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2002

Fingerprint

elbows
Elbow Joint
Radio
radio
Dogs
Forelimb
Canidae
joints (animal)
radius (bone)
dogs
forelimbs
External Fixators
Elbow
experimental design
shortenings
Bone Screws
Sensitivity and Specificity
Diaphyses
Ulna
bones

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Mason, D. R., Schulz, K. S., Samii, V. F., Fujita, Y., Hornof, W. J., Herrgesell, E. J., ... Kass, P. H. (2002). Sensitivity of radiographic evaluation of radio-ulnar incongruence in the dog in vitro. Veterinary Surgery, 31(2), 125-132. https://doi.org/10.1053/jvet.2002.31046

Sensitivity of radiographic evaluation of radio-ulnar incongruence in the dog in vitro. / Mason, David R.; Schulz, Kurt S.; Samii, Valerie F.; Fujita, Yukihiro; Hornof, William J.; Herrgesell, Eric J.; Long, Craig D.; Morgan, Joe P.; Kass, Philip H.

In: Veterinary Surgery, Vol. 31, No. 2, 03.2002, p. 125-132.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mason, DR, Schulz, KS, Samii, VF, Fujita, Y, Hornof, WJ, Herrgesell, EJ, Long, CD, Morgan, JP & Kass, PH 2002, 'Sensitivity of radiographic evaluation of radio-ulnar incongruence in the dog in vitro', Veterinary Surgery, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 125-132. https://doi.org/10.1053/jvet.2002.31046
Mason DR, Schulz KS, Samii VF, Fujita Y, Hornof WJ, Herrgesell EJ et al. Sensitivity of radiographic evaluation of radio-ulnar incongruence in the dog in vitro. Veterinary Surgery. 2002 Mar;31(2):125-132. https://doi.org/10.1053/jvet.2002.31046
Mason, David R. ; Schulz, Kurt S. ; Samii, Valerie F. ; Fujita, Yukihiro ; Hornof, William J. ; Herrgesell, Eric J. ; Long, Craig D. ; Morgan, Joe P. ; Kass, Philip H. / Sensitivity of radiographic evaluation of radio-ulnar incongruence in the dog in vitro. In: Veterinary Surgery. 2002 ; Vol. 31, No. 2. pp. 125-132.
@article{ceda5160408c4546954ec3d91e1df1af,
title = "Sensitivity of radiographic evaluation of radio-ulnar incongruence in the dog in vitro",
abstract = "Objective - To determine the sensitivity and specificity of radiographic evaluation of radio-ulnar incongruence in canine elbow joints in vitro. Study Design - Radiographic evaluation of induced radio-ulnar incongruence in canine cadaveric forelimbs by radiologists blinded to study design. Sample Population - Six cadaveric canine left forelimbs. Methods - Extended lateral, 90° flexed lateral, and cranio-caudal projections were taken of the elbow joint of six cadaveric canine forelimbs. A four-pin, type I external skeletal fixator (ESF) with a linear motor side bar was attached to the medial aspect of the radius, and a 2-cm segment of bone was removed from the mid-diaphysis. A 3.5-mm cortical bone screw placed from the medial to lateral styloid processes prevented relative movement between the distal radius and ulna during radial shortening. The ESF was used to progressively shorten the radius in increments of 0.5 mm to a total of 4 mm. The three radiographic projections were repeated after each incremental change of length. After the study, each elbow joint was disarticulated to confirm the presence of a step defect. The original radiographs and three copies were randomized and then evaluated by four radiologists blinded to the study design. Radiologists were asked to evaluate whether the joint was normal or abnormal and if there was evidence of radio-ulnar incongruence. The ability of each radiologist to correctly identify congruent elbows (specificity) and incongruent elbows (sensitivity) was calculated. Results - The median specificity was 86{\%} using the lateral projection and 82{\%} using the cranio-caudal projection. The median sensitivities using the lateral and cranio-caudal radiographic projections were 78{\%} and 79{\%}, respectively. The degree of radial shortening required for individual radiologists to achieve a sensitivity of 90{\%} ranged from 1.5 mm to greater than 4 mm. Clinical Relevance - Standard radiographic evaluation for radio-ulnar incongruence in the dog may be associated with relatively poor sensitivity and specificity. Invasive surgical procedures and screening programs that rely on radiographic diagnosis of radio-ulnar incongruence should be discouraged until a more reliable method of diagnosis of this type of elbow joint incongruence is available.",
author = "Mason, {David R.} and Schulz, {Kurt S.} and Samii, {Valerie F.} and Yukihiro Fujita and Hornof, {William J.} and Herrgesell, {Eric J.} and Long, {Craig D.} and Morgan, {Joe P.} and Kass, {Philip H}",
year = "2002",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1053/jvet.2002.31046",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "125--132",
journal = "Veterinary Surgery",
issn = "0161-3499",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sensitivity of radiographic evaluation of radio-ulnar incongruence in the dog in vitro

AU - Mason, David R.

AU - Schulz, Kurt S.

AU - Samii, Valerie F.

AU - Fujita, Yukihiro

AU - Hornof, William J.

AU - Herrgesell, Eric J.

AU - Long, Craig D.

AU - Morgan, Joe P.

AU - Kass, Philip H

PY - 2002/3

Y1 - 2002/3

N2 - Objective - To determine the sensitivity and specificity of radiographic evaluation of radio-ulnar incongruence in canine elbow joints in vitro. Study Design - Radiographic evaluation of induced radio-ulnar incongruence in canine cadaveric forelimbs by radiologists blinded to study design. Sample Population - Six cadaveric canine left forelimbs. Methods - Extended lateral, 90° flexed lateral, and cranio-caudal projections were taken of the elbow joint of six cadaveric canine forelimbs. A four-pin, type I external skeletal fixator (ESF) with a linear motor side bar was attached to the medial aspect of the radius, and a 2-cm segment of bone was removed from the mid-diaphysis. A 3.5-mm cortical bone screw placed from the medial to lateral styloid processes prevented relative movement between the distal radius and ulna during radial shortening. The ESF was used to progressively shorten the radius in increments of 0.5 mm to a total of 4 mm. The three radiographic projections were repeated after each incremental change of length. After the study, each elbow joint was disarticulated to confirm the presence of a step defect. The original radiographs and three copies were randomized and then evaluated by four radiologists blinded to the study design. Radiologists were asked to evaluate whether the joint was normal or abnormal and if there was evidence of radio-ulnar incongruence. The ability of each radiologist to correctly identify congruent elbows (specificity) and incongruent elbows (sensitivity) was calculated. Results - The median specificity was 86% using the lateral projection and 82% using the cranio-caudal projection. The median sensitivities using the lateral and cranio-caudal radiographic projections were 78% and 79%, respectively. The degree of radial shortening required for individual radiologists to achieve a sensitivity of 90% ranged from 1.5 mm to greater than 4 mm. Clinical Relevance - Standard radiographic evaluation for radio-ulnar incongruence in the dog may be associated with relatively poor sensitivity and specificity. Invasive surgical procedures and screening programs that rely on radiographic diagnosis of radio-ulnar incongruence should be discouraged until a more reliable method of diagnosis of this type of elbow joint incongruence is available.

AB - Objective - To determine the sensitivity and specificity of radiographic evaluation of radio-ulnar incongruence in canine elbow joints in vitro. Study Design - Radiographic evaluation of induced radio-ulnar incongruence in canine cadaveric forelimbs by radiologists blinded to study design. Sample Population - Six cadaveric canine left forelimbs. Methods - Extended lateral, 90° flexed lateral, and cranio-caudal projections were taken of the elbow joint of six cadaveric canine forelimbs. A four-pin, type I external skeletal fixator (ESF) with a linear motor side bar was attached to the medial aspect of the radius, and a 2-cm segment of bone was removed from the mid-diaphysis. A 3.5-mm cortical bone screw placed from the medial to lateral styloid processes prevented relative movement between the distal radius and ulna during radial shortening. The ESF was used to progressively shorten the radius in increments of 0.5 mm to a total of 4 mm. The three radiographic projections were repeated after each incremental change of length. After the study, each elbow joint was disarticulated to confirm the presence of a step defect. The original radiographs and three copies were randomized and then evaluated by four radiologists blinded to the study design. Radiologists were asked to evaluate whether the joint was normal or abnormal and if there was evidence of radio-ulnar incongruence. The ability of each radiologist to correctly identify congruent elbows (specificity) and incongruent elbows (sensitivity) was calculated. Results - The median specificity was 86% using the lateral projection and 82% using the cranio-caudal projection. The median sensitivities using the lateral and cranio-caudal radiographic projections were 78% and 79%, respectively. The degree of radial shortening required for individual radiologists to achieve a sensitivity of 90% ranged from 1.5 mm to greater than 4 mm. Clinical Relevance - Standard radiographic evaluation for radio-ulnar incongruence in the dog may be associated with relatively poor sensitivity and specificity. Invasive surgical procedures and screening programs that rely on radiographic diagnosis of radio-ulnar incongruence should be discouraged until a more reliable method of diagnosis of this type of elbow joint incongruence is available.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036512959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036512959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/jvet.2002.31046

DO - 10.1053/jvet.2002.31046

M3 - Article

C2 - 11884957

AN - SCOPUS:0036512959

VL - 31

SP - 125

EP - 132

JO - Veterinary Surgery

JF - Veterinary Surgery

SN - 0161-3499

IS - 2

ER -