Sell v. U.S.

Involuntary Medication to Restore Trial Competency - A Workable Standard?

Joan B. Gerbasi, Charles L Scott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Competency to Stand Trial (CST) evaluations are common in the U.S. criminal justice system. Of those defendants found Incompetent to Stand Trial (IST), psychotic disorders are the most common diagnoses, and active psychotic symptoms are strongly correlated with impairments in trial-related abilities. If a defendant is rendered IST because of psychosis, restoration will be unlikely without antipsychotic medication. Last term, in Sell v. U.S., the U.S. Supreme Court dealt with medication refusal in the context of competency restoration. The Court held that involuntary medication, under certain circumstances, is appropriate. This article includes a review of earlier relevant legal decisions and an analysis and discussion of the Sell decision.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)83-90
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
Volume32
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2004

Fingerprint

Psychotic Disorders
medication
Criminal Law
Aptitude
Decision Support Techniques
restoration
Antipsychotic Agents
psychosis
Supreme Court
justice
ability
evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Sell v. U.S. Involuntary Medication to Restore Trial Competency - A Workable Standard? / Gerbasi, Joan B.; Scott, Charles L.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2004, p. 83-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e506c57b160243d49cbef3dd440aafe9,
title = "Sell v. U.S.: Involuntary Medication to Restore Trial Competency - A Workable Standard?",
abstract = "Competency to Stand Trial (CST) evaluations are common in the U.S. criminal justice system. Of those defendants found Incompetent to Stand Trial (IST), psychotic disorders are the most common diagnoses, and active psychotic symptoms are strongly correlated with impairments in trial-related abilities. If a defendant is rendered IST because of psychosis, restoration will be unlikely without antipsychotic medication. Last term, in Sell v. U.S., the U.S. Supreme Court dealt with medication refusal in the context of competency restoration. The Court held that involuntary medication, under certain circumstances, is appropriate. This article includes a review of earlier relevant legal decisions and an analysis and discussion of the Sell decision.",
author = "Gerbasi, {Joan B.} and Scott, {Charles L}",
year = "2004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "83--90",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law",
issn = "1093-6793",
publisher = "American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sell v. U.S.

T2 - Involuntary Medication to Restore Trial Competency - A Workable Standard?

AU - Gerbasi, Joan B.

AU - Scott, Charles L

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Competency to Stand Trial (CST) evaluations are common in the U.S. criminal justice system. Of those defendants found Incompetent to Stand Trial (IST), psychotic disorders are the most common diagnoses, and active psychotic symptoms are strongly correlated with impairments in trial-related abilities. If a defendant is rendered IST because of psychosis, restoration will be unlikely without antipsychotic medication. Last term, in Sell v. U.S., the U.S. Supreme Court dealt with medication refusal in the context of competency restoration. The Court held that involuntary medication, under certain circumstances, is appropriate. This article includes a review of earlier relevant legal decisions and an analysis and discussion of the Sell decision.

AB - Competency to Stand Trial (CST) evaluations are common in the U.S. criminal justice system. Of those defendants found Incompetent to Stand Trial (IST), psychotic disorders are the most common diagnoses, and active psychotic symptoms are strongly correlated with impairments in trial-related abilities. If a defendant is rendered IST because of psychosis, restoration will be unlikely without antipsychotic medication. Last term, in Sell v. U.S., the U.S. Supreme Court dealt with medication refusal in the context of competency restoration. The Court held that involuntary medication, under certain circumstances, is appropriate. This article includes a review of earlier relevant legal decisions and an analysis and discussion of the Sell decision.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1842614202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1842614202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 83

EP - 90

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

SN - 1093-6793

IS - 1

ER -