Selective attention to spatial frequency: An ERP and source localization analysis

Johanna M P Baas, J. Leon Kenemans, George R Mangun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Physiological correlates of visual selective attention have been observed by recording ERPs to attended versus ignored target stimuli. Over many such studies, spatial attention has been observed to modulate early sensory components beginning 70 ms after stimulus onset, while effects of selection based on other stimulus features such as color and spatial frequency occur at longer latencies. Together, these findings argue for a primacy of location in early attentional selection. However, there have been some reports suggesting attention effects on short latency sensory-evoked potentials during selection of spatial frequency. The prime objective of the present study was to assess whether or not spatial frequency-dependent potentials are modulated by attention at a latency as early as 70-100 ms. Methods: Checkerboard patterns were flashed to the subject, one being the target requiring a response. We investigated attentional effects using high-density scalp mapping and inverse dipole modeling. Results: The earliest robust signs of selective attention to spatial frequencies consisted of an occipital selection negativity (OSN) and a frontal selection positivity (FSP). The OSN started at a latency of 140 ms, the FSP somewhat earlier at 120 ms. These attention effects were readily modeled by sources in cortical areas ventrally and laterally to the more primary areas generating the shorter-latency sensory components. Conclusions: This pattern of results has been found for non-spatial stimulus features in several studies, and is clearly different from the ERP correlates of spatial selection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1840-1854
Number of pages15
JournalClinical Neurophysiology
Volume113
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2002

Fingerprint

Scalp
Evoked Potentials
Color

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Dipole-source analysis
  • Evoked potential
  • Selection
  • Spatial frequency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Neurology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Selective attention to spatial frequency : An ERP and source localization analysis. / Baas, Johanna M P; Kenemans, J. Leon; Mangun, George R.

In: Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 113, No. 11, 11.2002, p. 1840-1854.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Baas, Johanna M P ; Kenemans, J. Leon ; Mangun, George R. / Selective attention to spatial frequency : An ERP and source localization analysis. In: Clinical Neurophysiology. 2002 ; Vol. 113, No. 11. pp. 1840-1854.
@article{e55d07656a7d48b195cfee96731fab89,
title = "Selective attention to spatial frequency: An ERP and source localization analysis",
abstract = "Objectives: Physiological correlates of visual selective attention have been observed by recording ERPs to attended versus ignored target stimuli. Over many such studies, spatial attention has been observed to modulate early sensory components beginning 70 ms after stimulus onset, while effects of selection based on other stimulus features such as color and spatial frequency occur at longer latencies. Together, these findings argue for a primacy of location in early attentional selection. However, there have been some reports suggesting attention effects on short latency sensory-evoked potentials during selection of spatial frequency. The prime objective of the present study was to assess whether or not spatial frequency-dependent potentials are modulated by attention at a latency as early as 70-100 ms. Methods: Checkerboard patterns were flashed to the subject, one being the target requiring a response. We investigated attentional effects using high-density scalp mapping and inverse dipole modeling. Results: The earliest robust signs of selective attention to spatial frequencies consisted of an occipital selection negativity (OSN) and a frontal selection positivity (FSP). The OSN started at a latency of 140 ms, the FSP somewhat earlier at 120 ms. These attention effects were readily modeled by sources in cortical areas ventrally and laterally to the more primary areas generating the shorter-latency sensory components. Conclusions: This pattern of results has been found for non-spatial stimulus features in several studies, and is clearly different from the ERP correlates of spatial selection.",
keywords = "Attention, Dipole-source analysis, Evoked potential, Selection, Spatial frequency",
author = "Baas, {Johanna M P} and Kenemans, {J. Leon} and Mangun, {George R}",
year = "2002",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00269-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "113",
pages = "1840--1854",
journal = "Clinical Neurophysiology",
issn = "1388-2457",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Selective attention to spatial frequency

T2 - An ERP and source localization analysis

AU - Baas, Johanna M P

AU - Kenemans, J. Leon

AU - Mangun, George R

PY - 2002/11

Y1 - 2002/11

N2 - Objectives: Physiological correlates of visual selective attention have been observed by recording ERPs to attended versus ignored target stimuli. Over many such studies, spatial attention has been observed to modulate early sensory components beginning 70 ms after stimulus onset, while effects of selection based on other stimulus features such as color and spatial frequency occur at longer latencies. Together, these findings argue for a primacy of location in early attentional selection. However, there have been some reports suggesting attention effects on short latency sensory-evoked potentials during selection of spatial frequency. The prime objective of the present study was to assess whether or not spatial frequency-dependent potentials are modulated by attention at a latency as early as 70-100 ms. Methods: Checkerboard patterns were flashed to the subject, one being the target requiring a response. We investigated attentional effects using high-density scalp mapping and inverse dipole modeling. Results: The earliest robust signs of selective attention to spatial frequencies consisted of an occipital selection negativity (OSN) and a frontal selection positivity (FSP). The OSN started at a latency of 140 ms, the FSP somewhat earlier at 120 ms. These attention effects were readily modeled by sources in cortical areas ventrally and laterally to the more primary areas generating the shorter-latency sensory components. Conclusions: This pattern of results has been found for non-spatial stimulus features in several studies, and is clearly different from the ERP correlates of spatial selection.

AB - Objectives: Physiological correlates of visual selective attention have been observed by recording ERPs to attended versus ignored target stimuli. Over many such studies, spatial attention has been observed to modulate early sensory components beginning 70 ms after stimulus onset, while effects of selection based on other stimulus features such as color and spatial frequency occur at longer latencies. Together, these findings argue for a primacy of location in early attentional selection. However, there have been some reports suggesting attention effects on short latency sensory-evoked potentials during selection of spatial frequency. The prime objective of the present study was to assess whether or not spatial frequency-dependent potentials are modulated by attention at a latency as early as 70-100 ms. Methods: Checkerboard patterns were flashed to the subject, one being the target requiring a response. We investigated attentional effects using high-density scalp mapping and inverse dipole modeling. Results: The earliest robust signs of selective attention to spatial frequencies consisted of an occipital selection negativity (OSN) and a frontal selection positivity (FSP). The OSN started at a latency of 140 ms, the FSP somewhat earlier at 120 ms. These attention effects were readily modeled by sources in cortical areas ventrally and laterally to the more primary areas generating the shorter-latency sensory components. Conclusions: This pattern of results has been found for non-spatial stimulus features in several studies, and is clearly different from the ERP correlates of spatial selection.

KW - Attention

KW - Dipole-source analysis

KW - Evoked potential

KW - Selection

KW - Spatial frequency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036848142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036848142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00269-9

DO - 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00269-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 12417240

AN - SCOPUS:0036848142

VL - 113

SP - 1840

EP - 1854

JO - Clinical Neurophysiology

JF - Clinical Neurophysiology

SN - 1388-2457

IS - 11

ER -