Segment-specific resistivity improves body fluid volume estimates from bioimpedance spectroscopy in hemodialysis patients

F. Zhu, M. K. Kuhlmann, George Kaysen, S. Sarkar, C. Kaitwatcharachai, R. Khilnani, L. Stevens, E. F. Leonard, J. Wang, S. Heymsfield, N. W. Levin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Discrepancies in body fluid estimates between segmental bioimpedance spectroscopy (SBIS) and gold-standard methods may be due to the use of a uniform value of tissue resistivity to compute extracellular fluid volume (ECV) and intracellular fluid volume (ICV). Discrepancies may also arise from the exclusion of fluid volumes of hands, feet, neck, and head from measurements due to electrode positions. The aim of this study was to define the specific resistivity of various body segments and to use those values for computation of ECV and ICV along with a correction for unmeasured fluid volumes. Twenty-nine maintenance hemodialysis patients (16 men) underwent body composition analysis including whole body MRI, whole body potassium ( 40K) content, deuterium, and sodium bromide dilution, and segmental and wrist-to-ankle bioimpedance spectroscopy, all performed on the same day before a hemodialysis. Segment-specific resistivity was determined from segmental fat-free mass (FFM; by MRI), hydration status of FFM (by deuterium and sodium bromide), tissue resistance (by SBIS), and segment length. Segmental FFM was higher and extracellular hydration of FFM was lower in men compared with women. Segment-specific resistivity values for arm, trunk, and leg all differed from the uniform resistivity used in traditional SBIS algorithms. Estimates for whole body ECV, ICV, and total body water from SBIS using segmental instead of uniform resistivity values and after adjustment for unmeasured fluid volumes of the body did not differ significantly from gold-standard measures. The uniform tissue resistivity values used in traditional SBIS algorithms result in under-estimation of ECV, ICV, and total body water. Use of segmental resistivity values combined with adjustment for body volumes that are neglected by traditional SBIS technique significantly improves estimations of body fluid volume in hemodialysis patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)717-724
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Applied Physiology
Volume100
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2006

Fingerprint

Body Fluids
Renal Dialysis
Intracellular Fluid
Spectrum Analysis
Extracellular Fluid
Body Water
Deuterium
Gold
Body Composition
Wrist
Ankle
Foot
Leg
Potassium
Electrodes
Arm
Neck
Hand
Fats
Head

Keywords

  • Bioimpedance
  • Body composition
  • Body fluid
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Segments
  • Whole body

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Endocrinology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Segment-specific resistivity improves body fluid volume estimates from bioimpedance spectroscopy in hemodialysis patients. / Zhu, F.; Kuhlmann, M. K.; Kaysen, George; Sarkar, S.; Kaitwatcharachai, C.; Khilnani, R.; Stevens, L.; Leonard, E. F.; Wang, J.; Heymsfield, S.; Levin, N. W.

In: Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 100, No. 2, 02.2006, p. 717-724.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zhu, F, Kuhlmann, MK, Kaysen, G, Sarkar, S, Kaitwatcharachai, C, Khilnani, R, Stevens, L, Leonard, EF, Wang, J, Heymsfield, S & Levin, NW 2006, 'Segment-specific resistivity improves body fluid volume estimates from bioimpedance spectroscopy in hemodialysis patients', Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 717-724. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00669.2005
Zhu, F. ; Kuhlmann, M. K. ; Kaysen, George ; Sarkar, S. ; Kaitwatcharachai, C. ; Khilnani, R. ; Stevens, L. ; Leonard, E. F. ; Wang, J. ; Heymsfield, S. ; Levin, N. W. / Segment-specific resistivity improves body fluid volume estimates from bioimpedance spectroscopy in hemodialysis patients. In: Journal of Applied Physiology. 2006 ; Vol. 100, No. 2. pp. 717-724.
@article{f9a7292f605848cdaad2fd1b40d04eef,
title = "Segment-specific resistivity improves body fluid volume estimates from bioimpedance spectroscopy in hemodialysis patients",
abstract = "Discrepancies in body fluid estimates between segmental bioimpedance spectroscopy (SBIS) and gold-standard methods may be due to the use of a uniform value of tissue resistivity to compute extracellular fluid volume (ECV) and intracellular fluid volume (ICV). Discrepancies may also arise from the exclusion of fluid volumes of hands, feet, neck, and head from measurements due to electrode positions. The aim of this study was to define the specific resistivity of various body segments and to use those values for computation of ECV and ICV along with a correction for unmeasured fluid volumes. Twenty-nine maintenance hemodialysis patients (16 men) underwent body composition analysis including whole body MRI, whole body potassium ( 40K) content, deuterium, and sodium bromide dilution, and segmental and wrist-to-ankle bioimpedance spectroscopy, all performed on the same day before a hemodialysis. Segment-specific resistivity was determined from segmental fat-free mass (FFM; by MRI), hydration status of FFM (by deuterium and sodium bromide), tissue resistance (by SBIS), and segment length. Segmental FFM was higher and extracellular hydration of FFM was lower in men compared with women. Segment-specific resistivity values for arm, trunk, and leg all differed from the uniform resistivity used in traditional SBIS algorithms. Estimates for whole body ECV, ICV, and total body water from SBIS using segmental instead of uniform resistivity values and after adjustment for unmeasured fluid volumes of the body did not differ significantly from gold-standard measures. The uniform tissue resistivity values used in traditional SBIS algorithms result in under-estimation of ECV, ICV, and total body water. Use of segmental resistivity values combined with adjustment for body volumes that are neglected by traditional SBIS technique significantly improves estimations of body fluid volume in hemodialysis patients.",
keywords = "Bioimpedance, Body composition, Body fluid, Magnetic resonance imaging, Segments, Whole body",
author = "F. Zhu and Kuhlmann, {M. K.} and George Kaysen and S. Sarkar and C. Kaitwatcharachai and R. Khilnani and L. Stevens and Leonard, {E. F.} and J. Wang and S. Heymsfield and Levin, {N. W.}",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1152/japplphysiol.00669.2005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "100",
pages = "717--724",
journal = "Journal of Applied Physiology",
issn = "8750-7587",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Segment-specific resistivity improves body fluid volume estimates from bioimpedance spectroscopy in hemodialysis patients

AU - Zhu, F.

AU - Kuhlmann, M. K.

AU - Kaysen, George

AU - Sarkar, S.

AU - Kaitwatcharachai, C.

AU - Khilnani, R.

AU - Stevens, L.

AU - Leonard, E. F.

AU - Wang, J.

AU - Heymsfield, S.

AU - Levin, N. W.

PY - 2006/2

Y1 - 2006/2

N2 - Discrepancies in body fluid estimates between segmental bioimpedance spectroscopy (SBIS) and gold-standard methods may be due to the use of a uniform value of tissue resistivity to compute extracellular fluid volume (ECV) and intracellular fluid volume (ICV). Discrepancies may also arise from the exclusion of fluid volumes of hands, feet, neck, and head from measurements due to electrode positions. The aim of this study was to define the specific resistivity of various body segments and to use those values for computation of ECV and ICV along with a correction for unmeasured fluid volumes. Twenty-nine maintenance hemodialysis patients (16 men) underwent body composition analysis including whole body MRI, whole body potassium ( 40K) content, deuterium, and sodium bromide dilution, and segmental and wrist-to-ankle bioimpedance spectroscopy, all performed on the same day before a hemodialysis. Segment-specific resistivity was determined from segmental fat-free mass (FFM; by MRI), hydration status of FFM (by deuterium and sodium bromide), tissue resistance (by SBIS), and segment length. Segmental FFM was higher and extracellular hydration of FFM was lower in men compared with women. Segment-specific resistivity values for arm, trunk, and leg all differed from the uniform resistivity used in traditional SBIS algorithms. Estimates for whole body ECV, ICV, and total body water from SBIS using segmental instead of uniform resistivity values and after adjustment for unmeasured fluid volumes of the body did not differ significantly from gold-standard measures. The uniform tissue resistivity values used in traditional SBIS algorithms result in under-estimation of ECV, ICV, and total body water. Use of segmental resistivity values combined with adjustment for body volumes that are neglected by traditional SBIS technique significantly improves estimations of body fluid volume in hemodialysis patients.

AB - Discrepancies in body fluid estimates between segmental bioimpedance spectroscopy (SBIS) and gold-standard methods may be due to the use of a uniform value of tissue resistivity to compute extracellular fluid volume (ECV) and intracellular fluid volume (ICV). Discrepancies may also arise from the exclusion of fluid volumes of hands, feet, neck, and head from measurements due to electrode positions. The aim of this study was to define the specific resistivity of various body segments and to use those values for computation of ECV and ICV along with a correction for unmeasured fluid volumes. Twenty-nine maintenance hemodialysis patients (16 men) underwent body composition analysis including whole body MRI, whole body potassium ( 40K) content, deuterium, and sodium bromide dilution, and segmental and wrist-to-ankle bioimpedance spectroscopy, all performed on the same day before a hemodialysis. Segment-specific resistivity was determined from segmental fat-free mass (FFM; by MRI), hydration status of FFM (by deuterium and sodium bromide), tissue resistance (by SBIS), and segment length. Segmental FFM was higher and extracellular hydration of FFM was lower in men compared with women. Segment-specific resistivity values for arm, trunk, and leg all differed from the uniform resistivity used in traditional SBIS algorithms. Estimates for whole body ECV, ICV, and total body water from SBIS using segmental instead of uniform resistivity values and after adjustment for unmeasured fluid volumes of the body did not differ significantly from gold-standard measures. The uniform tissue resistivity values used in traditional SBIS algorithms result in under-estimation of ECV, ICV, and total body water. Use of segmental resistivity values combined with adjustment for body volumes that are neglected by traditional SBIS technique significantly improves estimations of body fluid volume in hemodialysis patients.

KW - Bioimpedance

KW - Body composition

KW - Body fluid

KW - Magnetic resonance imaging

KW - Segments

KW - Whole body

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646347693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646347693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1152/japplphysiol.00669.2005

DO - 10.1152/japplphysiol.00669.2005

M3 - Article

C2 - 16254072

AN - SCOPUS:33646347693

VL - 100

SP - 717

EP - 724

JO - Journal of Applied Physiology

JF - Journal of Applied Physiology

SN - 8750-7587

IS - 2

ER -