Screening for intestinal parasites. Is a single specimen valid?

David Kawatu, R. E. Lees, R. A. Maclachlan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To assess the validity of a single stool or perianal swab specimen when screening for potentially pathogenic parasites, 88 residents of a centre for developmentally handicapped adults were screened by collecting on alternate days three stool samples and pinworm swabs. Both sensitivity and negative predictive values were so low that three samples were required for some parasites. The species being screened for and its underlying prevalence must be considered before collecting only one specimen to reduce laboratory costs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1748-1750
Number of pages3
JournalCanadian Family Physician
Volume39
StatePublished - Aug 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Parasites
Enterobius
Disabled Persons
Costs and Cost Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Screening for intestinal parasites. Is a single specimen valid? / Kawatu, David; Lees, R. E.; Maclachlan, R. A.

In: Canadian Family Physician, Vol. 39, 08.1993, p. 1748-1750.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kawatu, David ; Lees, R. E. ; Maclachlan, R. A. / Screening for intestinal parasites. Is a single specimen valid?. In: Canadian Family Physician. 1993 ; Vol. 39. pp. 1748-1750.
@article{ef248237271647b19b25bd309096c457,
title = "Screening for intestinal parasites. Is a single specimen valid?",
abstract = "To assess the validity of a single stool or perianal swab specimen when screening for potentially pathogenic parasites, 88 residents of a centre for developmentally handicapped adults were screened by collecting on alternate days three stool samples and pinworm swabs. Both sensitivity and negative predictive values were so low that three samples were required for some parasites. The species being screened for and its underlying prevalence must be considered before collecting only one specimen to reduce laboratory costs.",
author = "David Kawatu and Lees, {R. E.} and Maclachlan, {R. A.}",
year = "1993",
month = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "1748--1750",
journal = "Canadian Family Physician",
issn = "0008-350X",
publisher = "College of Family Physicians of Canada",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Screening for intestinal parasites. Is a single specimen valid?

AU - Kawatu, David

AU - Lees, R. E.

AU - Maclachlan, R. A.

PY - 1993/8

Y1 - 1993/8

N2 - To assess the validity of a single stool or perianal swab specimen when screening for potentially pathogenic parasites, 88 residents of a centre for developmentally handicapped adults were screened by collecting on alternate days three stool samples and pinworm swabs. Both sensitivity and negative predictive values were so low that three samples were required for some parasites. The species being screened for and its underlying prevalence must be considered before collecting only one specimen to reduce laboratory costs.

AB - To assess the validity of a single stool or perianal swab specimen when screening for potentially pathogenic parasites, 88 residents of a centre for developmentally handicapped adults were screened by collecting on alternate days three stool samples and pinworm swabs. Both sensitivity and negative predictive values were so low that three samples were required for some parasites. The species being screened for and its underlying prevalence must be considered before collecting only one specimen to reduce laboratory costs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027645495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027645495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8374361

AN - SCOPUS:0027645495

VL - 39

SP - 1748

EP - 1750

JO - Canadian Family Physician

JF - Canadian Family Physician

SN - 0008-350X

ER -