Sarcopenia among patients receiving hemodialysis: Weighing the evidence

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sarcopenia among patients receiving hemodialysis

T2 - Weighing the evidence

AU - Kittiskulnam, Piyawan

AU - Carrero, Juan J.

AU - Chertow, Glenn M.

AU - Kaysen, George

AU - Delgado, Cynthia

AU - Johansen, Kirsten L.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Background: There is no consensus on how best to define low muscle mass in patients with end-stage renal disease. Use of muscle mass normalized to height-squared has been suggested by geriatric societies but may underestimate sarcopenia, particularly in the setting of excess adiposity. We compared four definitions of low muscle mass in a prevalent hemodialysis cohort. Methods: ACTIVE/ADIPOSE enrolled prevalent patients receiving hemodialysis from the San Francisco and Atlanta areas from June 2009 to August 2011. Whole-body muscle mass was estimated using bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy, performed before a midweek dialysis session (n=645; age 56.7±14.5years, 41% women). We defined low muscle mass as muscle mass of 2SD or more below sex-specific bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy-derived means for young adults (18-49years) from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and indexed to height2, body weight (percentage), body surface area (BSA) by the DuBois formula, or Quételet's body mass index (BMI). We compared prevalence of low muscle mass among the four methods and assessed their correlation with strength and physical performance. Results: The prevalence of low muscle mass ranged from 8 to 32%. Muscle mass indexed to height2 classified the smallest percentage of patients as having low muscle mass, particularly among women, whereas indexing by BSA classified the largest percentage. Low muscle mass/height2 was present almost exclusively among normal or underweight patients, whereas indexing to body weight and BMI classified more overweight and obese patients as having low muscle mass. Handgrip strength was lower among those with low muscle mass by all methods except height2. Handgrip strength was directly and modestly correlated with muscle mass normalized by percentage of body weight, BSA, and BMI (ρ=0.43, 0.56, and, 0.64, respectively) and less so with muscle/height2 (ρ=0.31, P<0.001). The difference in grip strength among patients with low vs. normal muscle mass was largest according to muscle/BMI (-6.84kg, 95% CI -8.66 to -5.02, P<0.001). There were significant direct correlations of gait speed with muscle mass indexed to percentage of body weight, BSA, and BMI but not with muscle mass indexed to height2. Conclusions: Skeletal muscle mass normalized to height2 may underestimate the prevalence of low muscle mass, particularly among overweight and obese patients on hemodialysis. Valid detection of sarcopenia among obese patients receiving hemodialysis requires adjustment for body size.

AB - Background: There is no consensus on how best to define low muscle mass in patients with end-stage renal disease. Use of muscle mass normalized to height-squared has been suggested by geriatric societies but may underestimate sarcopenia, particularly in the setting of excess adiposity. We compared four definitions of low muscle mass in a prevalent hemodialysis cohort. Methods: ACTIVE/ADIPOSE enrolled prevalent patients receiving hemodialysis from the San Francisco and Atlanta areas from June 2009 to August 2011. Whole-body muscle mass was estimated using bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy, performed before a midweek dialysis session (n=645; age 56.7±14.5years, 41% women). We defined low muscle mass as muscle mass of 2SD or more below sex-specific bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy-derived means for young adults (18-49years) from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and indexed to height2, body weight (percentage), body surface area (BSA) by the DuBois formula, or Quételet's body mass index (BMI). We compared prevalence of low muscle mass among the four methods and assessed their correlation with strength and physical performance. Results: The prevalence of low muscle mass ranged from 8 to 32%. Muscle mass indexed to height2 classified the smallest percentage of patients as having low muscle mass, particularly among women, whereas indexing by BSA classified the largest percentage. Low muscle mass/height2 was present almost exclusively among normal or underweight patients, whereas indexing to body weight and BMI classified more overweight and obese patients as having low muscle mass. Handgrip strength was lower among those with low muscle mass by all methods except height2. Handgrip strength was directly and modestly correlated with muscle mass normalized by percentage of body weight, BSA, and BMI (ρ=0.43, 0.56, and, 0.64, respectively) and less so with muscle/height2 (ρ=0.31, P<0.001). The difference in grip strength among patients with low vs. normal muscle mass was largest according to muscle/BMI (-6.84kg, 95% CI -8.66 to -5.02, P<0.001). There were significant direct correlations of gait speed with muscle mass indexed to percentage of body weight, BSA, and BMI but not with muscle mass indexed to height2. Conclusions: Skeletal muscle mass normalized to height2 may underestimate the prevalence of low muscle mass, particularly among overweight and obese patients on hemodialysis. Valid detection of sarcopenia among obese patients receiving hemodialysis requires adjustment for body size.

KW - Gait speed

KW - Handgrip strength

KW - Hemodialysis

KW - Low muscle mass

KW - Sarcopenia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981502655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84981502655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jcsm.12130

DO - 10.1002/jcsm.12130

M3 - Article

C2 - 27897415

AN - SCOPUS:84981502655

JO - Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle

JF - Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle

SN - 2190-5991

ER -