Roper v. Simmons

Can juvenile offenders be executed?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In Roper v. Simmons, the U.S. Supreme Court was once again asked to determine if the execution of a juvenile, aged 16 or 17 years at the time of the offense, represents cruel and unusual punishment. In a five-to-four decision, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Supreme Court of Missouri to overturn the death penalty of Christopher Simmons and held that the execution of juvenile offenders violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)547-552
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
Volume33
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Supreme Court Decisions
Capital Punishment
juvenile offender
Punishment
Supreme Court
death penalty
amendment
penalty
offense

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Roper v. Simmons : Can juvenile offenders be executed? / Scott, Charles L.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2005, p. 547-552.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b2344c99da324acf84bb92a7399b47af,
title = "Roper v. Simmons: Can juvenile offenders be executed?",
abstract = "In Roper v. Simmons, the U.S. Supreme Court was once again asked to determine if the execution of a juvenile, aged 16 or 17 years at the time of the offense, represents cruel and unusual punishment. In a five-to-four decision, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Supreme Court of Missouri to overturn the death penalty of Christopher Simmons and held that the execution of juvenile offenders violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.",
author = "Scott, {Charles L}",
year = "2005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "547--552",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law",
issn = "1093-6793",
publisher = "American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Roper v. Simmons

T2 - Can juvenile offenders be executed?

AU - Scott, Charles L

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - In Roper v. Simmons, the U.S. Supreme Court was once again asked to determine if the execution of a juvenile, aged 16 or 17 years at the time of the offense, represents cruel and unusual punishment. In a five-to-four decision, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Supreme Court of Missouri to overturn the death penalty of Christopher Simmons and held that the execution of juvenile offenders violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.

AB - In Roper v. Simmons, the U.S. Supreme Court was once again asked to determine if the execution of a juvenile, aged 16 or 17 years at the time of the offense, represents cruel and unusual punishment. In a five-to-four decision, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Supreme Court of Missouri to overturn the death penalty of Christopher Simmons and held that the execution of juvenile offenders violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=29444440000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=29444440000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 547

EP - 552

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

SN - 1093-6793

IS - 4

ER -