Role of bird movements in the epidemiology of west nile and avian infl uenza virus

Sabir B. Muzaffar, Nichola J. Hill, John Y. Takekawa, William M. Perry, Lacy M. Smith, Walter M Boyce

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Avian infl uenza virus (AIV) is infl uenced by site fi delity and movements of bird hosts. We examined the movement ecology of American crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos) as potential hosts for West Nile virus (WNV) and greater white-fronted geese (Anser albifrons frontalis) as potential hosts for AIVs. Research was based on radio-telemetry studies conducted in the Central Valley of California, USA. While crows were restricted to a small area of only a few square kilometers, the distribution of the geese encompassed the northern Central Valley. The crows used 1.5 to 3.5 different roosting areas monthly from February through October, revealing lower roost fi delity than the geese that used 1.1 to 1.5 roosting areas each month from November through March. The crows moved a mean distance of 0.11 to 0.49 km/month between their roosting sites and 2.5 to 3.9 km/month between roosting and feeding sites. In contrast, the geese moved 4.2 to 19.3 km/month between roosting areas, and their feeding range varied from 13.2 to 19.0 km/month. Our comparison of the ecological characteristics of bird movements suggests that the limited local movements of crows coupled with frequent turnover of roosts may result in persistence of focal areas for WNV infection. In contrast, widespread areas used by geese will provide regular opportunities for intermixing of AIVs over a much greater geographic area.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)72-88
Number of pages17
JournalHuman-Wildlife Interactions
Volume6
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

roosting
epidemiology
virus
bird
West Nile virus
valley
radiotelemetry
turnover
persistence
ecology

Keywords

  • Avian influenza
  • Disease ecology
  • Epidemiology
  • Human-wildlife conflicts
  • Migratory birds
  • Movement ecology
  • West nile virus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Ecology

Cite this

Muzaffar, S. B., Hill, N. J., Takekawa, J. Y., Perry, W. M., Smith, L. M., & Boyce, W. M. (2012). Role of bird movements in the epidemiology of west nile and avian infl uenza virus. Human-Wildlife Interactions, 6(1), 72-88.

Role of bird movements in the epidemiology of west nile and avian infl uenza virus. / Muzaffar, Sabir B.; Hill, Nichola J.; Takekawa, John Y.; Perry, William M.; Smith, Lacy M.; Boyce, Walter M.

In: Human-Wildlife Interactions, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2012, p. 72-88.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Muzaffar, SB, Hill, NJ, Takekawa, JY, Perry, WM, Smith, LM & Boyce, WM 2012, 'Role of bird movements in the epidemiology of west nile and avian infl uenza virus', Human-Wildlife Interactions, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 72-88.
Muzaffar, Sabir B. ; Hill, Nichola J. ; Takekawa, John Y. ; Perry, William M. ; Smith, Lacy M. ; Boyce, Walter M. / Role of bird movements in the epidemiology of west nile and avian infl uenza virus. In: Human-Wildlife Interactions. 2012 ; Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 72-88.
@article{fad58bf4895745e49d95943421c1bd45,
title = "Role of bird movements in the epidemiology of west nile and avian infl uenza virus",
abstract = "Avian infl uenza virus (AIV) is infl uenced by site fi delity and movements of bird hosts. We examined the movement ecology of American crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos) as potential hosts for West Nile virus (WNV) and greater white-fronted geese (Anser albifrons frontalis) as potential hosts for AIVs. Research was based on radio-telemetry studies conducted in the Central Valley of California, USA. While crows were restricted to a small area of only a few square kilometers, the distribution of the geese encompassed the northern Central Valley. The crows used 1.5 to 3.5 different roosting areas monthly from February through October, revealing lower roost fi delity than the geese that used 1.1 to 1.5 roosting areas each month from November through March. The crows moved a mean distance of 0.11 to 0.49 km/month between their roosting sites and 2.5 to 3.9 km/month between roosting and feeding sites. In contrast, the geese moved 4.2 to 19.3 km/month between roosting areas, and their feeding range varied from 13.2 to 19.0 km/month. Our comparison of the ecological characteristics of bird movements suggests that the limited local movements of crows coupled with frequent turnover of roosts may result in persistence of focal areas for WNV infection. In contrast, widespread areas used by geese will provide regular opportunities for intermixing of AIVs over a much greater geographic area.",
keywords = "Avian influenza, Disease ecology, Epidemiology, Human-wildlife conflicts, Migratory birds, Movement ecology, West nile virus",
author = "Muzaffar, {Sabir B.} and Hill, {Nichola J.} and Takekawa, {John Y.} and Perry, {William M.} and Smith, {Lacy M.} and Boyce, {Walter M}",
year = "2012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "72--88",
journal = "Human-Wildlife Interactions",
issn = "2155-3858",
publisher = "Jack H. Berryman Institute",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Role of bird movements in the epidemiology of west nile and avian infl uenza virus

AU - Muzaffar, Sabir B.

AU - Hill, Nichola J.

AU - Takekawa, John Y.

AU - Perry, William M.

AU - Smith, Lacy M.

AU - Boyce, Walter M

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Avian infl uenza virus (AIV) is infl uenced by site fi delity and movements of bird hosts. We examined the movement ecology of American crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos) as potential hosts for West Nile virus (WNV) and greater white-fronted geese (Anser albifrons frontalis) as potential hosts for AIVs. Research was based on radio-telemetry studies conducted in the Central Valley of California, USA. While crows were restricted to a small area of only a few square kilometers, the distribution of the geese encompassed the northern Central Valley. The crows used 1.5 to 3.5 different roosting areas monthly from February through October, revealing lower roost fi delity than the geese that used 1.1 to 1.5 roosting areas each month from November through March. The crows moved a mean distance of 0.11 to 0.49 km/month between their roosting sites and 2.5 to 3.9 km/month between roosting and feeding sites. In contrast, the geese moved 4.2 to 19.3 km/month between roosting areas, and their feeding range varied from 13.2 to 19.0 km/month. Our comparison of the ecological characteristics of bird movements suggests that the limited local movements of crows coupled with frequent turnover of roosts may result in persistence of focal areas for WNV infection. In contrast, widespread areas used by geese will provide regular opportunities for intermixing of AIVs over a much greater geographic area.

AB - Avian infl uenza virus (AIV) is infl uenced by site fi delity and movements of bird hosts. We examined the movement ecology of American crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos) as potential hosts for West Nile virus (WNV) and greater white-fronted geese (Anser albifrons frontalis) as potential hosts for AIVs. Research was based on radio-telemetry studies conducted in the Central Valley of California, USA. While crows were restricted to a small area of only a few square kilometers, the distribution of the geese encompassed the northern Central Valley. The crows used 1.5 to 3.5 different roosting areas monthly from February through October, revealing lower roost fi delity than the geese that used 1.1 to 1.5 roosting areas each month from November through March. The crows moved a mean distance of 0.11 to 0.49 km/month between their roosting sites and 2.5 to 3.9 km/month between roosting and feeding sites. In contrast, the geese moved 4.2 to 19.3 km/month between roosting areas, and their feeding range varied from 13.2 to 19.0 km/month. Our comparison of the ecological characteristics of bird movements suggests that the limited local movements of crows coupled with frequent turnover of roosts may result in persistence of focal areas for WNV infection. In contrast, widespread areas used by geese will provide regular opportunities for intermixing of AIVs over a much greater geographic area.

KW - Avian influenza

KW - Disease ecology

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Human-wildlife conflicts

KW - Migratory birds

KW - Movement ecology

KW - West nile virus

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872578874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872578874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 72

EP - 88

JO - Human-Wildlife Interactions

JF - Human-Wildlife Interactions

SN - 2155-3858

IS - 1

ER -