Robust optimization in lung treatment plans accounting for geometric uncertainty

Xin Zhang, Yi Rong, Steven Morrill, Jian Fang, Ganesh Narayanasamy, Edvaldo Galhardo, Sanjay Maraboyina, Christopher Croft, Fen xia, Jose Penagaricano

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Robust optimization generates scenario-based plans by a minimax optimization method to find optimal scenario for the trade-off between target coverage robustness and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. In this study, 20 lung cancer patients with tumors located at various anatomical regions within the lungs were selected and robust optimization photon treatment plans including intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were generated. The plan robustness was analyzed using perturbed doses with setup error boundary of ±3 mm in anterior/posterior (AP), ±3 mm in left/right (LR), and ±5 mm in inferior/superior (IS) directions from isocenter. Perturbed doses for D99, D98, and D95 were computed from six shifted isocenter plans to evaluate plan robustness. Dosimetric study was performed to compare the internal target volume-based robust optimization plans (ITV-IMRT and ITV-VMAT) and conventional PTV margin-based plans (PTV-IMRT and PTV-VMAT). The dosimetric comparison parameters were: ITV target mean dose (Dmean), R95(D95/Dprescription), Paddick's conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), monitor unit (MU), and OAR doses including lung (Dmean, V20 Gy and V15 Gy), chest wall, heart, esophagus, and maximum cord doses. A comparison of optimization results showed the robust optimization plan had better ITV dose coverage, better CI, worse HI, and lower OAR doses than conventional PTV margin-based plans. Plan robustness evaluation showed that the perturbed doses of D99, D98, and D95 were all satisfied at least 99% of the ITV to received 95% of prescription doses. It was also observed that PTV margin-based plans had higher MU than robust optimization plans. The results also showed robust optimization can generate plans that offer increased OAR sparing, especially for normal lungs and OARs near or abutting the target. Weak correlation was found between normal lung dose and target size, and no other correlation was observed in this study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)19-26
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
lungs
Uncertainty
Organs at Risk
Lung
optimization
dosage
Radiotherapy
organs
Therapeutics
radiation therapy
margins
therapy
Thoracic Wall
arcs
Photons
Esophagus
Prescriptions
Lung Neoplasms
homogeneity

Keywords

  • dosimetric comparison
  • RayStation
  • robust optimization
  • treatment planning system

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiation
  • Instrumentation
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Zhang, X., Rong, Y., Morrill, S., Fang, J., Narayanasamy, G., Galhardo, E., ... Penagaricano, J. (2018). Robust optimization in lung treatment plans accounting for geometric uncertainty. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 19(3), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12291

Robust optimization in lung treatment plans accounting for geometric uncertainty. / Zhang, Xin; Rong, Yi; Morrill, Steven; Fang, Jian; Narayanasamy, Ganesh; Galhardo, Edvaldo; Maraboyina, Sanjay; Croft, Christopher; xia, Fen; Penagaricano, Jose.

In: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, Vol. 19, No. 3, 01.05.2018, p. 19-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Zhang, X, Rong, Y, Morrill, S, Fang, J, Narayanasamy, G, Galhardo, E, Maraboyina, S, Croft, C, xia, F & Penagaricano, J 2018, 'Robust optimization in lung treatment plans accounting for geometric uncertainty', Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 19-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12291
Zhang, Xin ; Rong, Yi ; Morrill, Steven ; Fang, Jian ; Narayanasamy, Ganesh ; Galhardo, Edvaldo ; Maraboyina, Sanjay ; Croft, Christopher ; xia, Fen ; Penagaricano, Jose. / Robust optimization in lung treatment plans accounting for geometric uncertainty. In: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. 2018 ; Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 19-26.
@article{fc7ac918a14c4024b57937234e07e204,
title = "Robust optimization in lung treatment plans accounting for geometric uncertainty",
abstract = "Robust optimization generates scenario-based plans by a minimax optimization method to find optimal scenario for the trade-off between target coverage robustness and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. In this study, 20 lung cancer patients with tumors located at various anatomical regions within the lungs were selected and robust optimization photon treatment plans including intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were generated. The plan robustness was analyzed using perturbed doses with setup error boundary of ±3 mm in anterior/posterior (AP), ±3 mm in left/right (LR), and ±5 mm in inferior/superior (IS) directions from isocenter. Perturbed doses for D99, D98, and D95 were computed from six shifted isocenter plans to evaluate plan robustness. Dosimetric study was performed to compare the internal target volume-based robust optimization plans (ITV-IMRT and ITV-VMAT) and conventional PTV margin-based plans (PTV-IMRT and PTV-VMAT). The dosimetric comparison parameters were: ITV target mean dose (Dmean), R95(D95/Dprescription), Paddick's conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), monitor unit (MU), and OAR doses including lung (Dmean, V20 Gy and V15 Gy), chest wall, heart, esophagus, and maximum cord doses. A comparison of optimization results showed the robust optimization plan had better ITV dose coverage, better CI, worse HI, and lower OAR doses than conventional PTV margin-based plans. Plan robustness evaluation showed that the perturbed doses of D99, D98, and D95 were all satisfied at least 99{\%} of the ITV to received 95{\%} of prescription doses. It was also observed that PTV margin-based plans had higher MU than robust optimization plans. The results also showed robust optimization can generate plans that offer increased OAR sparing, especially for normal lungs and OARs near or abutting the target. Weak correlation was found between normal lung dose and target size, and no other correlation was observed in this study.",
keywords = "dosimetric comparison, RayStation, robust optimization, treatment planning system",
author = "Xin Zhang and Yi Rong and Steven Morrill and Jian Fang and Ganesh Narayanasamy and Edvaldo Galhardo and Sanjay Maraboyina and Christopher Croft and Fen xia and Jose Penagaricano",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/acm2.12291",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "19--26",
journal = "Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics",
issn = "1526-9914",
publisher = "American Institute of Physics Publising LLC",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Robust optimization in lung treatment plans accounting for geometric uncertainty

AU - Zhang, Xin

AU - Rong, Yi

AU - Morrill, Steven

AU - Fang, Jian

AU - Narayanasamy, Ganesh

AU - Galhardo, Edvaldo

AU - Maraboyina, Sanjay

AU - Croft, Christopher

AU - xia, Fen

AU - Penagaricano, Jose

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Robust optimization generates scenario-based plans by a minimax optimization method to find optimal scenario for the trade-off between target coverage robustness and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. In this study, 20 lung cancer patients with tumors located at various anatomical regions within the lungs were selected and robust optimization photon treatment plans including intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were generated. The plan robustness was analyzed using perturbed doses with setup error boundary of ±3 mm in anterior/posterior (AP), ±3 mm in left/right (LR), and ±5 mm in inferior/superior (IS) directions from isocenter. Perturbed doses for D99, D98, and D95 were computed from six shifted isocenter plans to evaluate plan robustness. Dosimetric study was performed to compare the internal target volume-based robust optimization plans (ITV-IMRT and ITV-VMAT) and conventional PTV margin-based plans (PTV-IMRT and PTV-VMAT). The dosimetric comparison parameters were: ITV target mean dose (Dmean), R95(D95/Dprescription), Paddick's conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), monitor unit (MU), and OAR doses including lung (Dmean, V20 Gy and V15 Gy), chest wall, heart, esophagus, and maximum cord doses. A comparison of optimization results showed the robust optimization plan had better ITV dose coverage, better CI, worse HI, and lower OAR doses than conventional PTV margin-based plans. Plan robustness evaluation showed that the perturbed doses of D99, D98, and D95 were all satisfied at least 99% of the ITV to received 95% of prescription doses. It was also observed that PTV margin-based plans had higher MU than robust optimization plans. The results also showed robust optimization can generate plans that offer increased OAR sparing, especially for normal lungs and OARs near or abutting the target. Weak correlation was found between normal lung dose and target size, and no other correlation was observed in this study.

AB - Robust optimization generates scenario-based plans by a minimax optimization method to find optimal scenario for the trade-off between target coverage robustness and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. In this study, 20 lung cancer patients with tumors located at various anatomical regions within the lungs were selected and robust optimization photon treatment plans including intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were generated. The plan robustness was analyzed using perturbed doses with setup error boundary of ±3 mm in anterior/posterior (AP), ±3 mm in left/right (LR), and ±5 mm in inferior/superior (IS) directions from isocenter. Perturbed doses for D99, D98, and D95 were computed from six shifted isocenter plans to evaluate plan robustness. Dosimetric study was performed to compare the internal target volume-based robust optimization plans (ITV-IMRT and ITV-VMAT) and conventional PTV margin-based plans (PTV-IMRT and PTV-VMAT). The dosimetric comparison parameters were: ITV target mean dose (Dmean), R95(D95/Dprescription), Paddick's conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), monitor unit (MU), and OAR doses including lung (Dmean, V20 Gy and V15 Gy), chest wall, heart, esophagus, and maximum cord doses. A comparison of optimization results showed the robust optimization plan had better ITV dose coverage, better CI, worse HI, and lower OAR doses than conventional PTV margin-based plans. Plan robustness evaluation showed that the perturbed doses of D99, D98, and D95 were all satisfied at least 99% of the ITV to received 95% of prescription doses. It was also observed that PTV margin-based plans had higher MU than robust optimization plans. The results also showed robust optimization can generate plans that offer increased OAR sparing, especially for normal lungs and OARs near or abutting the target. Weak correlation was found between normal lung dose and target size, and no other correlation was observed in this study.

KW - dosimetric comparison

KW - RayStation

KW - robust optimization

KW - treatment planning system

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043485222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043485222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/acm2.12291

DO - 10.1002/acm2.12291

M3 - Review article

VL - 19

SP - 19

EP - 26

JO - Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

JF - Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

SN - 1526-9914

IS - 3

ER -