Risk factors for vaginal mesh exposure after mesh-augmented anterior repair

A retrospective cohort study

Dominique El-Khawand, Salim A. Wehbe, Peter G. O'Hare, Divya Arunachalam, Babak Vakili

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to identify risk factors for vaginal mesh exposure after mesh-augmented repair of anterior prolapse. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients who had mesh-augmented anterior repair by 1 surgeon between January 2007 and February 2012. Data were extracted from medical records. The primary outcome was the rate of anterior or apical vaginal mesh exposure. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results: A total of 201 subjects were included. Themean (SD) follow-up was 14.3 (12.4) months. All cases were done using a type 1 macroporous monofilament polypropylene mesh. The overall mesh exposure rate was 8.5% (17/201). Univariate analysis showed a statistically significant positive association between exposure rates and the following risk factors: lower body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.016), menopause in combination with the use of hormone replacement therapy (P = 0.023), midline sagittal vaginal incision (compared with distal transverse incision) (P = 0.026), concurrent total hysterectomy (P G 0.001), surgery time (P = 0.002), and worse apical prolapse at baseline (P = 0.007). After multivariate analysis using logistic regression, only BMI (P G 0.001) and concomitant total hysterectomy (odds ratio, 48; P G 0.001) remained relevant. The exposure rate was 23.5% (16/68) when concomitant hysterectomy was performed compared with 0.8% (1/133) when no hysterectomy was done. Exposure rates stratified by BMI class were 12.9% (8/62) for BMI less than 25 kg/m2, 9.5% (8/84) for BMI of 25 to 29.9 kg/m2, 3.1% (1/32) for BMI of 30 to 34.9 kg/m2, and 0% (0/23) for BMI greater than or equal to 35 kg/m2. Conclusions: Concomitant total hysterectomy is an independent risk factor for mesh exposure after mesh-augmented anterior repair, whereas BMI may negatively correlate with exposure rates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)305-309
Number of pages5
JournalFemale Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume20
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Body Mass Index
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Hysterectomy
Prolapse
Multivariate Analysis
Polypropylenes
Hormone Replacement Therapy
Menopause
Medical Records
Logistic Models
Odds Ratio

Keywords

  • Exposure
  • Mesh
  • Pelvic organ prolapse

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Surgery
  • Urology

Cite this

Risk factors for vaginal mesh exposure after mesh-augmented anterior repair : A retrospective cohort study. / El-Khawand, Dominique; Wehbe, Salim A.; O'Hare, Peter G.; Arunachalam, Divya; Vakili, Babak.

In: Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 20, No. 6, 2014, p. 305-309.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

El-Khawand, Dominique ; Wehbe, Salim A. ; O'Hare, Peter G. ; Arunachalam, Divya ; Vakili, Babak. / Risk factors for vaginal mesh exposure after mesh-augmented anterior repair : A retrospective cohort study. In: Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery. 2014 ; Vol. 20, No. 6. pp. 305-309.
@article{1daffd0a9b6f4424840c57e9ad4f800c,
title = "Risk factors for vaginal mesh exposure after mesh-augmented anterior repair: A retrospective cohort study",
abstract = "Objectives: The aim of this study is to identify risk factors for vaginal mesh exposure after mesh-augmented repair of anterior prolapse. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients who had mesh-augmented anterior repair by 1 surgeon between January 2007 and February 2012. Data were extracted from medical records. The primary outcome was the rate of anterior or apical vaginal mesh exposure. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results: A total of 201 subjects were included. Themean (SD) follow-up was 14.3 (12.4) months. All cases were done using a type 1 macroporous monofilament polypropylene mesh. The overall mesh exposure rate was 8.5{\%} (17/201). Univariate analysis showed a statistically significant positive association between exposure rates and the following risk factors: lower body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.016), menopause in combination with the use of hormone replacement therapy (P = 0.023), midline sagittal vaginal incision (compared with distal transverse incision) (P = 0.026), concurrent total hysterectomy (P G 0.001), surgery time (P = 0.002), and worse apical prolapse at baseline (P = 0.007). After multivariate analysis using logistic regression, only BMI (P G 0.001) and concomitant total hysterectomy (odds ratio, 48; P G 0.001) remained relevant. The exposure rate was 23.5{\%} (16/68) when concomitant hysterectomy was performed compared with 0.8{\%} (1/133) when no hysterectomy was done. Exposure rates stratified by BMI class were 12.9{\%} (8/62) for BMI less than 25 kg/m2, 9.5{\%} (8/84) for BMI of 25 to 29.9 kg/m2, 3.1{\%} (1/32) for BMI of 30 to 34.9 kg/m2, and 0{\%} (0/23) for BMI greater than or equal to 35 kg/m2. Conclusions: Concomitant total hysterectomy is an independent risk factor for mesh exposure after mesh-augmented anterior repair, whereas BMI may negatively correlate with exposure rates.",
keywords = "Exposure, Mesh, Pelvic organ prolapse",
author = "Dominique El-Khawand and Wehbe, {Salim A.} and O'Hare, {Peter G.} and Divya Arunachalam and Babak Vakili",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1097/SPV.0000000000000095",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "305--309",
journal = "Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "2151-8378",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk factors for vaginal mesh exposure after mesh-augmented anterior repair

T2 - A retrospective cohort study

AU - El-Khawand, Dominique

AU - Wehbe, Salim A.

AU - O'Hare, Peter G.

AU - Arunachalam, Divya

AU - Vakili, Babak

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objectives: The aim of this study is to identify risk factors for vaginal mesh exposure after mesh-augmented repair of anterior prolapse. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients who had mesh-augmented anterior repair by 1 surgeon between January 2007 and February 2012. Data were extracted from medical records. The primary outcome was the rate of anterior or apical vaginal mesh exposure. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results: A total of 201 subjects were included. Themean (SD) follow-up was 14.3 (12.4) months. All cases were done using a type 1 macroporous monofilament polypropylene mesh. The overall mesh exposure rate was 8.5% (17/201). Univariate analysis showed a statistically significant positive association between exposure rates and the following risk factors: lower body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.016), menopause in combination with the use of hormone replacement therapy (P = 0.023), midline sagittal vaginal incision (compared with distal transverse incision) (P = 0.026), concurrent total hysterectomy (P G 0.001), surgery time (P = 0.002), and worse apical prolapse at baseline (P = 0.007). After multivariate analysis using logistic regression, only BMI (P G 0.001) and concomitant total hysterectomy (odds ratio, 48; P G 0.001) remained relevant. The exposure rate was 23.5% (16/68) when concomitant hysterectomy was performed compared with 0.8% (1/133) when no hysterectomy was done. Exposure rates stratified by BMI class were 12.9% (8/62) for BMI less than 25 kg/m2, 9.5% (8/84) for BMI of 25 to 29.9 kg/m2, 3.1% (1/32) for BMI of 30 to 34.9 kg/m2, and 0% (0/23) for BMI greater than or equal to 35 kg/m2. Conclusions: Concomitant total hysterectomy is an independent risk factor for mesh exposure after mesh-augmented anterior repair, whereas BMI may negatively correlate with exposure rates.

AB - Objectives: The aim of this study is to identify risk factors for vaginal mesh exposure after mesh-augmented repair of anterior prolapse. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients who had mesh-augmented anterior repair by 1 surgeon between January 2007 and February 2012. Data were extracted from medical records. The primary outcome was the rate of anterior or apical vaginal mesh exposure. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results: A total of 201 subjects were included. Themean (SD) follow-up was 14.3 (12.4) months. All cases were done using a type 1 macroporous monofilament polypropylene mesh. The overall mesh exposure rate was 8.5% (17/201). Univariate analysis showed a statistically significant positive association between exposure rates and the following risk factors: lower body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.016), menopause in combination with the use of hormone replacement therapy (P = 0.023), midline sagittal vaginal incision (compared with distal transverse incision) (P = 0.026), concurrent total hysterectomy (P G 0.001), surgery time (P = 0.002), and worse apical prolapse at baseline (P = 0.007). After multivariate analysis using logistic regression, only BMI (P G 0.001) and concomitant total hysterectomy (odds ratio, 48; P G 0.001) remained relevant. The exposure rate was 23.5% (16/68) when concomitant hysterectomy was performed compared with 0.8% (1/133) when no hysterectomy was done. Exposure rates stratified by BMI class were 12.9% (8/62) for BMI less than 25 kg/m2, 9.5% (8/84) for BMI of 25 to 29.9 kg/m2, 3.1% (1/32) for BMI of 30 to 34.9 kg/m2, and 0% (0/23) for BMI greater than or equal to 35 kg/m2. Conclusions: Concomitant total hysterectomy is an independent risk factor for mesh exposure after mesh-augmented anterior repair, whereas BMI may negatively correlate with exposure rates.

KW - Exposure

KW - Mesh

KW - Pelvic organ prolapse

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928105418&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928105418&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000095

DO - 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000095

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 305

EP - 309

JO - Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 2151-8378

IS - 6

ER -