Abstract
Post-publication peer review (PPPR) is transforming how the life sciences community evaluates published manuscripts and data. Unsurprisingly, however, PPPR is experiencing growing pains, and some elements of the process distinct from standard pre-publication review remain controversial. I discuss the rapid evolution of PPPR, its impact, and the challenges associated with it.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Getting to Good |
| Subtitle of host publication | Research Integrity in the Biomedical Sciences |
| Publisher | Springer International Publishing |
| Pages | 380-384 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9783319513584 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9783319513577 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 23 2018 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Medicine(all)
Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reviewing post-publication peer review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Cite this
Knoepfler, P. S. (2018). Reviewing post-publication peer review. In Getting to Good: Research Integrity in the Biomedical Sciences (pp. 380-384). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2015.03.006