Reviewing post-publication peer review

Paul S Knoepfler

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

Abstract

Post-publication peer review (PPPR) is transforming how the life sciences community evaluates published manuscripts and data. Unsurprisingly, however, PPPR is experiencing growing pains, and some elements of the process distinct from standard pre-publication review remain controversial. I discuss the rapid evolution of PPPR, its impact, and the challenges associated with it.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationGetting to Good
Subtitle of host publicationResearch Integrity in the Biomedical Sciences
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages380-384
Number of pages5
ISBN (Electronic)9783319513584
ISBN (Print)9783319513577
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 23 2018

Fingerprint

Peer Review
Publications
Biological Science Disciplines
Manuscripts
Pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Knoepfler, P. S. (2018). Reviewing post-publication peer review. In Getting to Good: Research Integrity in the Biomedical Sciences (pp. 380-384). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2015.03.006

Reviewing post-publication peer review. / Knoepfler, Paul S.

Getting to Good: Research Integrity in the Biomedical Sciences. Springer International Publishing, 2018. p. 380-384.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

Knoepfler, PS 2018, Reviewing post-publication peer review. in Getting to Good: Research Integrity in the Biomedical Sciences. Springer International Publishing, pp. 380-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2015.03.006
Knoepfler PS. Reviewing post-publication peer review. In Getting to Good: Research Integrity in the Biomedical Sciences. Springer International Publishing. 2018. p. 380-384 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2015.03.006
Knoepfler, Paul S. / Reviewing post-publication peer review. Getting to Good: Research Integrity in the Biomedical Sciences. Springer International Publishing, 2018. pp. 380-384
@inbook{2cae12e1c48c400993e902746c1420a3,
title = "Reviewing post-publication peer review",
abstract = "Post-publication peer review (PPPR) is transforming how the life sciences community evaluates published manuscripts and data. Unsurprisingly, however, PPPR is experiencing growing pains, and some elements of the process distinct from standard pre-publication review remain controversial. I discuss the rapid evolution of PPPR, its impact, and the challenges associated with it.",
author = "Knoepfler, {Paul S}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1016/j.tig.2015.03.006",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9783319513577",
pages = "380--384",
booktitle = "Getting to Good",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Reviewing post-publication peer review

AU - Knoepfler, Paul S

PY - 2018/7/23

Y1 - 2018/7/23

N2 - Post-publication peer review (PPPR) is transforming how the life sciences community evaluates published manuscripts and data. Unsurprisingly, however, PPPR is experiencing growing pains, and some elements of the process distinct from standard pre-publication review remain controversial. I discuss the rapid evolution of PPPR, its impact, and the challenges associated with it.

AB - Post-publication peer review (PPPR) is transforming how the life sciences community evaluates published manuscripts and data. Unsurprisingly, however, PPPR is experiencing growing pains, and some elements of the process distinct from standard pre-publication review remain controversial. I discuss the rapid evolution of PPPR, its impact, and the challenges associated with it.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063363585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063363585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tig.2015.03.006

DO - 10.1016/j.tig.2015.03.006

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85063363585

SN - 9783319513577

SP - 380

EP - 384

BT - Getting to Good

PB - Springer International Publishing

ER -

Access to Document