Reviewing post-publication peer review

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Post-publication peer review (PPPR) is transforming how the life sciences community evaluates published manuscripts and data. Unsurprisingly, however, PPPR is experiencing growing pains, and some elements of the process distinct from standard pre-publication review remain controversial. I discuss the rapid evolution of PPPR, its impact, and the challenges associated with it.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)221-223
Number of pages3
JournalTrends in Genetics
Volume31
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2015

Fingerprint

Peer Review
Publications
Biological Science Disciplines
Manuscripts
Pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics

Cite this

Reviewing post-publication peer review. / Knoepfler, Paul S.

In: Trends in Genetics, Vol. 31, No. 5, 01.05.2015, p. 221-223.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{024bfd95fae444c09b4ca9d91752f8c6,
title = "Reviewing post-publication peer review",
abstract = "Post-publication peer review (PPPR) is transforming how the life sciences community evaluates published manuscripts and data. Unsurprisingly, however, PPPR is experiencing growing pains, and some elements of the process distinct from standard pre-publication review remain controversial. I discuss the rapid evolution of PPPR, its impact, and the challenges associated with it.",
author = "Knoepfler, {Paul S}",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.tig.2015.03.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "221--223",
journal = "Trends in Genetics",
issn = "0168-9525",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reviewing post-publication peer review

AU - Knoepfler, Paul S

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - Post-publication peer review (PPPR) is transforming how the life sciences community evaluates published manuscripts and data. Unsurprisingly, however, PPPR is experiencing growing pains, and some elements of the process distinct from standard pre-publication review remain controversial. I discuss the rapid evolution of PPPR, its impact, and the challenges associated with it.

AB - Post-publication peer review (PPPR) is transforming how the life sciences community evaluates published manuscripts and data. Unsurprisingly, however, PPPR is experiencing growing pains, and some elements of the process distinct from standard pre-publication review remain controversial. I discuss the rapid evolution of PPPR, its impact, and the challenges associated with it.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928765507&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928765507&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tig.2015.03.006

DO - 10.1016/j.tig.2015.03.006

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 221

EP - 223

JO - Trends in Genetics

JF - Trends in Genetics

SN - 0168-9525

IS - 5

ER -