Retrospective vs. prospective coital frequency and menstrual cycle length in a contraceptive effectiveness trial

Markus J. Steiner, Irva Hertz-Picciotto, Doug Taylor, Victor Schoenbach, Angie Wheeless

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine how well information at enrollment would predict coital frequency and menstrual segment length during a prospective contraceptive effectiveness trial. METHODS: We compared retrospective reports of monthly coital frequency and menstrual segment (cycle) length with prospective information for women participating in a contraceptive trial of the Reality® female condom. RESULTS: Participants reported slightly higher mean monthly coital frequency and slightly longer menstrual segments prior to the study than during the study (12.6 acts vs. 12.0 acts per month and 30.8 days vs. 28.4 days). We examined the actual distribution of differences between the retrospective and prospective measures and found considerable variability. Among the 195 participants studied, parous women were less likely to predict accurately menstrual segment length (OR 0.4; 95% CI 0.3-0.9), while older women were more likely to predict accurately coital frequency (OR 1.9; 95% CI 0.9-3.3). CONCLUSIONS: Coital frequency and menstrual segment length vary considerably over time. Hence, prospective data collection is essential to accurately characterize these variations and to properly interpret results from contraceptive trials and other studies concerned with fecundability and hazards of reproduction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)428-433
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of Epidemiology
Volume11
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Coitus
Menstrual Cycle
Contraceptive Agents
Female Condoms
Reproduction
Fertility

Keywords

  • Coitus
  • Contraception Behavior
  • Family Planning
  • Female Condoms
  • Menstrual Cycle

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Retrospective vs. prospective coital frequency and menstrual cycle length in a contraceptive effectiveness trial. / Steiner, Markus J.; Hertz-Picciotto, Irva; Taylor, Doug; Schoenbach, Victor; Wheeless, Angie.

In: Annals of Epidemiology, Vol. 11, No. 6, 2001, p. 428-433.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Steiner, Markus J. ; Hertz-Picciotto, Irva ; Taylor, Doug ; Schoenbach, Victor ; Wheeless, Angie. / Retrospective vs. prospective coital frequency and menstrual cycle length in a contraceptive effectiveness trial. In: Annals of Epidemiology. 2001 ; Vol. 11, No. 6. pp. 428-433.
@article{9a967ac4249f495381cf2b6e9e0ab39f,
title = "Retrospective vs. prospective coital frequency and menstrual cycle length in a contraceptive effectiveness trial",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To determine how well information at enrollment would predict coital frequency and menstrual segment length during a prospective contraceptive effectiveness trial. METHODS: We compared retrospective reports of monthly coital frequency and menstrual segment (cycle) length with prospective information for women participating in a contraceptive trial of the Reality{\circledR} female condom. RESULTS: Participants reported slightly higher mean monthly coital frequency and slightly longer menstrual segments prior to the study than during the study (12.6 acts vs. 12.0 acts per month and 30.8 days vs. 28.4 days). We examined the actual distribution of differences between the retrospective and prospective measures and found considerable variability. Among the 195 participants studied, parous women were less likely to predict accurately menstrual segment length (OR 0.4; 95{\%} CI 0.3-0.9), while older women were more likely to predict accurately coital frequency (OR 1.9; 95{\%} CI 0.9-3.3). CONCLUSIONS: Coital frequency and menstrual segment length vary considerably over time. Hence, prospective data collection is essential to accurately characterize these variations and to properly interpret results from contraceptive trials and other studies concerned with fecundability and hazards of reproduction.",
keywords = "Coitus, Contraception Behavior, Family Planning, Female Condoms, Menstrual Cycle",
author = "Steiner, {Markus J.} and Irva Hertz-Picciotto and Doug Taylor and Victor Schoenbach and Angie Wheeless",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1016/S1047-2797(01)00248-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "428--433",
journal = "Annals of Epidemiology",
issn = "1047-2797",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Retrospective vs. prospective coital frequency and menstrual cycle length in a contraceptive effectiveness trial

AU - Steiner, Markus J.

AU - Hertz-Picciotto, Irva

AU - Taylor, Doug

AU - Schoenbach, Victor

AU - Wheeless, Angie

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - PURPOSE: To determine how well information at enrollment would predict coital frequency and menstrual segment length during a prospective contraceptive effectiveness trial. METHODS: We compared retrospective reports of monthly coital frequency and menstrual segment (cycle) length with prospective information for women participating in a contraceptive trial of the Reality® female condom. RESULTS: Participants reported slightly higher mean monthly coital frequency and slightly longer menstrual segments prior to the study than during the study (12.6 acts vs. 12.0 acts per month and 30.8 days vs. 28.4 days). We examined the actual distribution of differences between the retrospective and prospective measures and found considerable variability. Among the 195 participants studied, parous women were less likely to predict accurately menstrual segment length (OR 0.4; 95% CI 0.3-0.9), while older women were more likely to predict accurately coital frequency (OR 1.9; 95% CI 0.9-3.3). CONCLUSIONS: Coital frequency and menstrual segment length vary considerably over time. Hence, prospective data collection is essential to accurately characterize these variations and to properly interpret results from contraceptive trials and other studies concerned with fecundability and hazards of reproduction.

AB - PURPOSE: To determine how well information at enrollment would predict coital frequency and menstrual segment length during a prospective contraceptive effectiveness trial. METHODS: We compared retrospective reports of monthly coital frequency and menstrual segment (cycle) length with prospective information for women participating in a contraceptive trial of the Reality® female condom. RESULTS: Participants reported slightly higher mean monthly coital frequency and slightly longer menstrual segments prior to the study than during the study (12.6 acts vs. 12.0 acts per month and 30.8 days vs. 28.4 days). We examined the actual distribution of differences between the retrospective and prospective measures and found considerable variability. Among the 195 participants studied, parous women were less likely to predict accurately menstrual segment length (OR 0.4; 95% CI 0.3-0.9), while older women were more likely to predict accurately coital frequency (OR 1.9; 95% CI 0.9-3.3). CONCLUSIONS: Coital frequency and menstrual segment length vary considerably over time. Hence, prospective data collection is essential to accurately characterize these variations and to properly interpret results from contraceptive trials and other studies concerned with fecundability and hazards of reproduction.

KW - Coitus

KW - Contraception Behavior

KW - Family Planning

KW - Female Condoms

KW - Menstrual Cycle

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034958941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034958941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1047-2797(01)00248-4

DO - 10.1016/S1047-2797(01)00248-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 11454502

AN - SCOPUS:0034958941

VL - 11

SP - 428

EP - 433

JO - Annals of Epidemiology

JF - Annals of Epidemiology

SN - 1047-2797

IS - 6

ER -