Rethinking thirty-day hospital readmissions: Shorter intervals might be better indicators of quality of care

David L. Chin, Heejung Bang, Raj N. Manickam, Patrick S Romano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Public reporting and payment programs in the United States have embraced thirty-day readmissions as an indicator of betweenhospital variation in the quality of care, despite limited evidence supporting this interval. We examined risk-standardized thirty-day risk of unplanned inpatient readmission at the hospital level for Medicare patients ages sixty-five and older in four states and for three conditions: acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia. The hospitallevel quality signal captured in readmission risk was highest on the first day after discharge and declined rapidly until it reached a nadir at seven days, as indicated by a decreasing intracluster correlation coefficient. Similar patterns were seen across states and diagnoses. The rapid decay in the quality signal suggests that most readmissions after the seventh day postdischarge were explained by community- and household-level factors beyond hospitals' control. Shorter intervals of seven or fewer days might improve the accuracy and equity of readmissions as a measure of hospital quality for public accountability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1867-1875
Number of pages9
JournalHealth Affairs
Volume35
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Patient Readmission
Quality of Health Care
Public Hospitals
Social Responsibility
Medicare
Inpatients
Pneumonia
Heart Failure
Myocardial Infarction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Rethinking thirty-day hospital readmissions : Shorter intervals might be better indicators of quality of care. / Chin, David L.; Bang, Heejung; Manickam, Raj N.; Romano, Patrick S.

In: Health Affairs, Vol. 35, No. 10, 2016, p. 1867-1875.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fa243c6b8ef7449cbbbd1d7baf891812,
title = "Rethinking thirty-day hospital readmissions: Shorter intervals might be better indicators of quality of care",
abstract = "Public reporting and payment programs in the United States have embraced thirty-day readmissions as an indicator of betweenhospital variation in the quality of care, despite limited evidence supporting this interval. We examined risk-standardized thirty-day risk of unplanned inpatient readmission at the hospital level for Medicare patients ages sixty-five and older in four states and for three conditions: acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia. The hospitallevel quality signal captured in readmission risk was highest on the first day after discharge and declined rapidly until it reached a nadir at seven days, as indicated by a decreasing intracluster correlation coefficient. Similar patterns were seen across states and diagnoses. The rapid decay in the quality signal suggests that most readmissions after the seventh day postdischarge were explained by community- and household-level factors beyond hospitals' control. Shorter intervals of seven or fewer days might improve the accuracy and equity of readmissions as a measure of hospital quality for public accountability.",
author = "Chin, {David L.} and Heejung Bang and Manickam, {Raj N.} and Romano, {Patrick S}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0205",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "1867--1875",
journal = "Health Affairs",
issn = "0278-2715",
publisher = "Project Hope",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rethinking thirty-day hospital readmissions

T2 - Shorter intervals might be better indicators of quality of care

AU - Chin, David L.

AU - Bang, Heejung

AU - Manickam, Raj N.

AU - Romano, Patrick S

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Public reporting and payment programs in the United States have embraced thirty-day readmissions as an indicator of betweenhospital variation in the quality of care, despite limited evidence supporting this interval. We examined risk-standardized thirty-day risk of unplanned inpatient readmission at the hospital level for Medicare patients ages sixty-five and older in four states and for three conditions: acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia. The hospitallevel quality signal captured in readmission risk was highest on the first day after discharge and declined rapidly until it reached a nadir at seven days, as indicated by a decreasing intracluster correlation coefficient. Similar patterns were seen across states and diagnoses. The rapid decay in the quality signal suggests that most readmissions after the seventh day postdischarge were explained by community- and household-level factors beyond hospitals' control. Shorter intervals of seven or fewer days might improve the accuracy and equity of readmissions as a measure of hospital quality for public accountability.

AB - Public reporting and payment programs in the United States have embraced thirty-day readmissions as an indicator of betweenhospital variation in the quality of care, despite limited evidence supporting this interval. We examined risk-standardized thirty-day risk of unplanned inpatient readmission at the hospital level for Medicare patients ages sixty-five and older in four states and for three conditions: acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia. The hospitallevel quality signal captured in readmission risk was highest on the first day after discharge and declined rapidly until it reached a nadir at seven days, as indicated by a decreasing intracluster correlation coefficient. Similar patterns were seen across states and diagnoses. The rapid decay in the quality signal suggests that most readmissions after the seventh day postdischarge were explained by community- and household-level factors beyond hospitals' control. Shorter intervals of seven or fewer days might improve the accuracy and equity of readmissions as a measure of hospital quality for public accountability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994267487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994267487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0205

DO - 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0205

M3 - Article

C2 - 27702961

AN - SCOPUS:84994267487

VL - 35

SP - 1867

EP - 1875

JO - Health Affairs

JF - Health Affairs

SN - 0278-2715

IS - 10

ER -