Results of a survey to estimate cattle movements and contact rates among beef herds in California, with reference to the potential spread and control of foot-and-mouth disease

Edith S. Marshall, Tim Carpenter, Clair Thunes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective-To estimate contact rates and movement variables for shipments of beef cattle to and from producer premises in California. Design-Cross-sectional survey. Sample Population-583 beef producers in California. Procedures-Questionnaires were developed and distributed to beef cattle producers in California.The study period was from April 20, 2005, through September 7 2006. Data from completed questionnaires were entered manually into an electronic format. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed. Results-Median number of interstate animal movements (movement of cattle into or out of California) was 0.17/mo; on the basis of this median, beef cattle were moved interstate > 2 times/y. Respondents kept beef cattle at up to 5 locations throughout the year. More than 40% of the movements from the respondents' premises were to a sale yard or auction facility. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-Frequency of animal movements in this statewide study differed from values in another study of monthly shipments of animals to and from beef operations in 3 counties of California.The survey reported here revealed more frequent movements of animals to and from beef operations of all sizes. In addition, there were more high-risk indirect contacts on beef operations than has been reported previously. However, the number of low-risk indirect contacts was similar for small beef operations but less for large beef operations than has been reported elsewhere. Epidemic simulation models for California based on data in earlier studies likely underpredicted disease transmission involving beef herds.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)573-579
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Volume235
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2009

Fingerprint

Foot-and-Mouth Disease
foot-and-mouth disease
beef
herds
cattle
beef cattle
indirect contact
animals
questionnaires
auctions
disease transmission
Red Meat
Surveys and Questionnaires
cross-sectional studies
sales
electronics
simulation models
Cross-Sectional Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

@article{f621fec5293747dbb9b81a03ebedec3f,
title = "Results of a survey to estimate cattle movements and contact rates among beef herds in California, with reference to the potential spread and control of foot-and-mouth disease",
abstract = "Objective-To estimate contact rates and movement variables for shipments of beef cattle to and from producer premises in California. Design-Cross-sectional survey. Sample Population-583 beef producers in California. Procedures-Questionnaires were developed and distributed to beef cattle producers in California.The study period was from April 20, 2005, through September 7 2006. Data from completed questionnaires were entered manually into an electronic format. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed. Results-Median number of interstate animal movements (movement of cattle into or out of California) was 0.17/mo; on the basis of this median, beef cattle were moved interstate > 2 times/y. Respondents kept beef cattle at up to 5 locations throughout the year. More than 40{\%} of the movements from the respondents' premises were to a sale yard or auction facility. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-Frequency of animal movements in this statewide study differed from values in another study of monthly shipments of animals to and from beef operations in 3 counties of California.The survey reported here revealed more frequent movements of animals to and from beef operations of all sizes. In addition, there were more high-risk indirect contacts on beef operations than has been reported previously. However, the number of low-risk indirect contacts was similar for small beef operations but less for large beef operations than has been reported elsewhere. Epidemic simulation models for California based on data in earlier studies likely underpredicted disease transmission involving beef herds.",
author = "Marshall, {Edith S.} and Tim Carpenter and Clair Thunes",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2460/javma.235.5.573",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "235",
pages = "573--579",
journal = "Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association",
issn = "0003-1488",
publisher = "American Veterinary Medical Association",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Results of a survey to estimate cattle movements and contact rates among beef herds in California, with reference to the potential spread and control of foot-and-mouth disease

AU - Marshall, Edith S.

AU - Carpenter, Tim

AU - Thunes, Clair

PY - 2009/9/1

Y1 - 2009/9/1

N2 - Objective-To estimate contact rates and movement variables for shipments of beef cattle to and from producer premises in California. Design-Cross-sectional survey. Sample Population-583 beef producers in California. Procedures-Questionnaires were developed and distributed to beef cattle producers in California.The study period was from April 20, 2005, through September 7 2006. Data from completed questionnaires were entered manually into an electronic format. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed. Results-Median number of interstate animal movements (movement of cattle into or out of California) was 0.17/mo; on the basis of this median, beef cattle were moved interstate > 2 times/y. Respondents kept beef cattle at up to 5 locations throughout the year. More than 40% of the movements from the respondents' premises were to a sale yard or auction facility. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-Frequency of animal movements in this statewide study differed from values in another study of monthly shipments of animals to and from beef operations in 3 counties of California.The survey reported here revealed more frequent movements of animals to and from beef operations of all sizes. In addition, there were more high-risk indirect contacts on beef operations than has been reported previously. However, the number of low-risk indirect contacts was similar for small beef operations but less for large beef operations than has been reported elsewhere. Epidemic simulation models for California based on data in earlier studies likely underpredicted disease transmission involving beef herds.

AB - Objective-To estimate contact rates and movement variables for shipments of beef cattle to and from producer premises in California. Design-Cross-sectional survey. Sample Population-583 beef producers in California. Procedures-Questionnaires were developed and distributed to beef cattle producers in California.The study period was from April 20, 2005, through September 7 2006. Data from completed questionnaires were entered manually into an electronic format. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed. Results-Median number of interstate animal movements (movement of cattle into or out of California) was 0.17/mo; on the basis of this median, beef cattle were moved interstate > 2 times/y. Respondents kept beef cattle at up to 5 locations throughout the year. More than 40% of the movements from the respondents' premises were to a sale yard or auction facility. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-Frequency of animal movements in this statewide study differed from values in another study of monthly shipments of animals to and from beef operations in 3 counties of California.The survey reported here revealed more frequent movements of animals to and from beef operations of all sizes. In addition, there were more high-risk indirect contacts on beef operations than has been reported previously. However, the number of low-risk indirect contacts was similar for small beef operations but less for large beef operations than has been reported elsewhere. Epidemic simulation models for California based on data in earlier studies likely underpredicted disease transmission involving beef herds.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349931462&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349931462&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2460/javma.235.5.573

DO - 10.2460/javma.235.5.573

M3 - Article

C2 - 19719450

AN - SCOPUS:70349931462

VL - 235

SP - 573

EP - 579

JO - Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association

JF - Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association

SN - 0003-1488

IS - 5

ER -