Response to "Best (but oft forgotten) practices

Testing for treatment effects in randomized trials by separate analyses of changes from baseline in each group is a misleading approach"

Kimber Stanhope, Peter J Havel

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)589
Number of pages1
JournalAmerican Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Volume103
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

Nutritional Sciences

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{bafa10eb5e454978b8b86f0bc406b6c1,
title = "Response to {"}Best (but oft forgotten) practices: Testing for treatment effects in randomized trials by separate analyses of changes from baseline in each group is a misleading approach{"}",
author = "Kimber Stanhope and Havel, {Peter J}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3945/ajcn.115.125989",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "103",
pages = "589",
journal = "American Journal of Clinical Nutrition",
issn = "0002-9165",
publisher = "American Society for Nutrition",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to "Best (but oft forgotten) practices

T2 - Testing for treatment effects in randomized trials by separate analyses of changes from baseline in each group is a misleading approach"

AU - Stanhope, Kimber

AU - Havel, Peter J

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956963760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84956963760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3945/ajcn.115.125989

DO - 10.3945/ajcn.115.125989

M3 - Letter

VL - 103

SP - 589

JO - American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

JF - American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

SN - 0002-9165

IS - 2

ER -