Resident experience and opinions about physician-assisted death for cancer patients

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hypothesis: Surgical residents and staff oncologists (surgical, medical, and radiation therapy) have similar opinions on participation in physician-assisted death for patients with terminal cancer. Design: Prospective survey. Setting: Tertiary care referral center. Participants: Residents undergoing surgical training (n = 56) and faculty oncologists (n = 24) of all specialties (surgical, medical, and radiation therapy). Main Outcome Measures: Subjects were queried regarding previous experience and willingness to participate (either directly or indirectly) in assisted death for terminal cancer patients. Results: Response rates were 39% (22 of 56) for the residents and 87% (21 of 24) for the oncologists. Of those who responded, 86% (19 of 22) of the residents would aid any of the hypothetical patients with assisted death, whereas only 19% (4 of 21) of the staff oncologists expressed willingness to perform the same service. Furthermore, 32% (7 of 22) of the residents reported previous involvement in a case of assisted death from any disease, whereas only 19% (4 of 21) of the staff oncologists reported previous direct experience with assisted death in the terminal cancer patient. Conclusions: Surgical residents tend to have more experience with assisted death and are much more willing than staff oncologists to aid terminal cancer patients with this procedure. These opinions and practices are probably not the result of medical education but are developed from personal values.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)60-64
Number of pages5
JournalArchives of Surgery
Volume136
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Assisted Suicide
Physicians
Neoplasms
Tertiary Care Centers
Radiotherapy
Surgical Specialties
Medical Education
Oncologists
Medicine
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Resident experience and opinions about physician-assisted death for cancer patients. / Bold, Richard J; Schneider, Philip D; Khatri, Vijay P.; Goodnight Jr, James E.

In: Archives of Surgery, Vol. 136, No. 1, 2001, p. 60-64.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b1bba87bff6349788782f386f0b24b10,
title = "Resident experience and opinions about physician-assisted death for cancer patients",
abstract = "Hypothesis: Surgical residents and staff oncologists (surgical, medical, and radiation therapy) have similar opinions on participation in physician-assisted death for patients with terminal cancer. Design: Prospective survey. Setting: Tertiary care referral center. Participants: Residents undergoing surgical training (n = 56) and faculty oncologists (n = 24) of all specialties (surgical, medical, and radiation therapy). Main Outcome Measures: Subjects were queried regarding previous experience and willingness to participate (either directly or indirectly) in assisted death for terminal cancer patients. Results: Response rates were 39{\%} (22 of 56) for the residents and 87{\%} (21 of 24) for the oncologists. Of those who responded, 86{\%} (19 of 22) of the residents would aid any of the hypothetical patients with assisted death, whereas only 19{\%} (4 of 21) of the staff oncologists expressed willingness to perform the same service. Furthermore, 32{\%} (7 of 22) of the residents reported previous involvement in a case of assisted death from any disease, whereas only 19{\%} (4 of 21) of the staff oncologists reported previous direct experience with assisted death in the terminal cancer patient. Conclusions: Surgical residents tend to have more experience with assisted death and are much more willing than staff oncologists to aid terminal cancer patients with this procedure. These opinions and practices are probably not the result of medical education but are developed from personal values.",
author = "Bold, {Richard J} and Schneider, {Philip D} and Khatri, {Vijay P.} and {Goodnight Jr}, {James E}",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "136",
pages = "60--64",
journal = "JAMA Surgery",
issn = "2168-6254",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resident experience and opinions about physician-assisted death for cancer patients

AU - Bold, Richard J

AU - Schneider, Philip D

AU - Khatri, Vijay P.

AU - Goodnight Jr, James E

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Hypothesis: Surgical residents and staff oncologists (surgical, medical, and radiation therapy) have similar opinions on participation in physician-assisted death for patients with terminal cancer. Design: Prospective survey. Setting: Tertiary care referral center. Participants: Residents undergoing surgical training (n = 56) and faculty oncologists (n = 24) of all specialties (surgical, medical, and radiation therapy). Main Outcome Measures: Subjects were queried regarding previous experience and willingness to participate (either directly or indirectly) in assisted death for terminal cancer patients. Results: Response rates were 39% (22 of 56) for the residents and 87% (21 of 24) for the oncologists. Of those who responded, 86% (19 of 22) of the residents would aid any of the hypothetical patients with assisted death, whereas only 19% (4 of 21) of the staff oncologists expressed willingness to perform the same service. Furthermore, 32% (7 of 22) of the residents reported previous involvement in a case of assisted death from any disease, whereas only 19% (4 of 21) of the staff oncologists reported previous direct experience with assisted death in the terminal cancer patient. Conclusions: Surgical residents tend to have more experience with assisted death and are much more willing than staff oncologists to aid terminal cancer patients with this procedure. These opinions and practices are probably not the result of medical education but are developed from personal values.

AB - Hypothesis: Surgical residents and staff oncologists (surgical, medical, and radiation therapy) have similar opinions on participation in physician-assisted death for patients with terminal cancer. Design: Prospective survey. Setting: Tertiary care referral center. Participants: Residents undergoing surgical training (n = 56) and faculty oncologists (n = 24) of all specialties (surgical, medical, and radiation therapy). Main Outcome Measures: Subjects were queried regarding previous experience and willingness to participate (either directly or indirectly) in assisted death for terminal cancer patients. Results: Response rates were 39% (22 of 56) for the residents and 87% (21 of 24) for the oncologists. Of those who responded, 86% (19 of 22) of the residents would aid any of the hypothetical patients with assisted death, whereas only 19% (4 of 21) of the staff oncologists expressed willingness to perform the same service. Furthermore, 32% (7 of 22) of the residents reported previous involvement in a case of assisted death from any disease, whereas only 19% (4 of 21) of the staff oncologists reported previous direct experience with assisted death in the terminal cancer patient. Conclusions: Surgical residents tend to have more experience with assisted death and are much more willing than staff oncologists to aid terminal cancer patients with this procedure. These opinions and practices are probably not the result of medical education but are developed from personal values.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035156431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035156431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 136

SP - 60

EP - 64

JO - JAMA Surgery

JF - JAMA Surgery

SN - 2168-6254

IS - 1

ER -