Residency training at a crossroads: Duty-Hour standards 2010

Kevin G. Volpp, William Friedman, Patrick S Romano, Amy Rosen, Jeffrey H. Silber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

In 2003, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) implemented a single duty-hour standard nationwide. The evidence to date suggests that this neither improved nor worsened patient outcomes. In June 2010, the ACGME proposed a new set of duty-hour standards for implementation in July 2011. The main disadvantage of this approach is that there is no ability to determine whether different standards would have worked better to reduce resident fatigue while improving patient safety. Many unanswered questions remain about how to design duty-hour standards, but relatively little evidence exists. In addition, the same approach may not work in all specialties and all hospitals. A more flexible, dynamic policy that emphasizes ongoing testing and evaluation would be more likely to achieve improvements in clinical and educational outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)826-828
Number of pages3
JournalAnnals of Internal Medicine
Volume153
Issue number12
StatePublished - Dec 21 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Residency training at a crossroads: Duty-Hour standards 2010'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Volpp, K. G., Friedman, W., Romano, P. S., Rosen, A., & Silber, J. H. (2010). Residency training at a crossroads: Duty-Hour standards 2010. Annals of Internal Medicine, 153(12), 826-828.