Reproductive coercion and partner violence: Implications for clinical assessment of unintended pregnancy

Elizabeth Miller, Jay G. Silverman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Unintended pregnancy is common, disproportionately affects younger women and is associated with intimate partner violence. Forced sex, fear of negotiating condom and contraceptive use, inconsistent condom use and partner interference with access to healthcare all contribute to this association between unintended pregnancy and intimate partner violence. A growing body of literature on male partner influences on contraception and pregnancy decision-making has identified a range of male partner pregnancy-controlling behaviors which we have termed reproductive coercion, defined as male partners attempts to promote pregnancy in their female partners through verbal pressure and threats to become pregnant (pregnancy coercion), direct interference with contraception (birth-control sabotage), and threats and coercion related to pregnancy continuation or termination (control of pregnancy outcomes). This article examines recent studies on male partner reproductive coercion, underscores the link between unintended pregnancy and intimate partner violence and highlights future directions for research as well as implications for clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)511-515
Number of pages5
JournalExpert Review of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume5
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2010

Fingerprint

Coercion
Violence
Pregnancy
Contraception
Condoms
Negotiating
Pregnancy Outcome
Contraceptive Agents
Fear
Decision Making
Delivery of Health Care
Pressure

Keywords

  • barrier contraception
  • condom nonuse
  • domestic violence
  • family planning services
  • gender-based violence
  • intimate partner violence
  • unwanted pregnancy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Maternity and Midwifery
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Reproductive coercion and partner violence : Implications for clinical assessment of unintended pregnancy. / Miller, Elizabeth; Silverman, Jay G.

In: Expert Review of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 5, No. 5, 09.2010, p. 511-515.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bcfaa5f0a94946e0bd646005d9605374,
title = "Reproductive coercion and partner violence: Implications for clinical assessment of unintended pregnancy",
abstract = "Unintended pregnancy is common, disproportionately affects younger women and is associated with intimate partner violence. Forced sex, fear of negotiating condom and contraceptive use, inconsistent condom use and partner interference with access to healthcare all contribute to this association between unintended pregnancy and intimate partner violence. A growing body of literature on male partner influences on contraception and pregnancy decision-making has identified a range of male partner pregnancy-controlling behaviors which we have termed reproductive coercion, defined as male partners attempts to promote pregnancy in their female partners through verbal pressure and threats to become pregnant (pregnancy coercion), direct interference with contraception (birth-control sabotage), and threats and coercion related to pregnancy continuation or termination (control of pregnancy outcomes). This article examines recent studies on male partner reproductive coercion, underscores the link between unintended pregnancy and intimate partner violence and highlights future directions for research as well as implications for clinical practice.",
keywords = "barrier contraception, condom nonuse, domestic violence, family planning services, gender-based violence, intimate partner violence, unwanted pregnancy",
author = "Elizabeth Miller and Silverman, {Jay G.}",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1586/eog.10.44",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "511--515",
journal = "Expert Review of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "1747-4108",
publisher = "Expert Reviews Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reproductive coercion and partner violence

T2 - Implications for clinical assessment of unintended pregnancy

AU - Miller, Elizabeth

AU - Silverman, Jay G.

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - Unintended pregnancy is common, disproportionately affects younger women and is associated with intimate partner violence. Forced sex, fear of negotiating condom and contraceptive use, inconsistent condom use and partner interference with access to healthcare all contribute to this association between unintended pregnancy and intimate partner violence. A growing body of literature on male partner influences on contraception and pregnancy decision-making has identified a range of male partner pregnancy-controlling behaviors which we have termed reproductive coercion, defined as male partners attempts to promote pregnancy in their female partners through verbal pressure and threats to become pregnant (pregnancy coercion), direct interference with contraception (birth-control sabotage), and threats and coercion related to pregnancy continuation or termination (control of pregnancy outcomes). This article examines recent studies on male partner reproductive coercion, underscores the link between unintended pregnancy and intimate partner violence and highlights future directions for research as well as implications for clinical practice.

AB - Unintended pregnancy is common, disproportionately affects younger women and is associated with intimate partner violence. Forced sex, fear of negotiating condom and contraceptive use, inconsistent condom use and partner interference with access to healthcare all contribute to this association between unintended pregnancy and intimate partner violence. A growing body of literature on male partner influences on contraception and pregnancy decision-making has identified a range of male partner pregnancy-controlling behaviors which we have termed reproductive coercion, defined as male partners attempts to promote pregnancy in their female partners through verbal pressure and threats to become pregnant (pregnancy coercion), direct interference with contraception (birth-control sabotage), and threats and coercion related to pregnancy continuation or termination (control of pregnancy outcomes). This article examines recent studies on male partner reproductive coercion, underscores the link between unintended pregnancy and intimate partner violence and highlights future directions for research as well as implications for clinical practice.

KW - barrier contraception

KW - condom nonuse

KW - domestic violence

KW - family planning services

KW - gender-based violence

KW - intimate partner violence

KW - unwanted pregnancy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956518149&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956518149&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1586/eog.10.44

DO - 10.1586/eog.10.44

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77956518149

VL - 5

SP - 511

EP - 515

JO - Expert Review of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Expert Review of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 1747-4108

IS - 5

ER -