Reply to Comment

'A novel method for fast and robust estimation of fluorescence decay dynamics using constrained least-square deconvolution with Laguerre expansion'

Dinglongw Ma, Jing Liu, Jinyi Qi, Laura Marcu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In this response we underscore that the instrumentation described in the original publication (Liu et al 2012 Phys. Med. Biol. 57 843-65) was based on pulse-sampling technique, while the comment by Zhang et al is based on the assumption that a time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC) instrumentation was used. Therefore the arguments made in the comment are not applicable to the noise model reported by Liu et al. As reported in the literature (Lakowicz 2006 Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy (New York: Springer)), while in the TCSPC the experimental noise can be estimated from Poisson statistics, such an assumption is not valid for pulse-sampling (transient recording) techniques. To further clarify this aspect, we present here a comprehensive noise model describing the signal and noise propagation of the pulse sampling time-resolved fluorescence detection. Experimental data recorded in various conditions are analyzed as a case study to demonstrate the noise model of our instrumental system. In addition, regarding the statement of correcting equation (3) in Liu et al (2012 Phys. Med. Biol. 57 843-65), the notation of discrete time Laguerre function in the original publication was clear and consistent with literature conventions (Marmarelis 1993 Ann. Biomed. Eng. 21 573-89, Westwick and Kearney 2003 Identification of Nonlinear Physiological Systems (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley)). Thus, it does not require revision.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1637-1641
Number of pages5
JournalPhysics in Medicine and Biology
Volume62
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017

Fingerprint

Least-Squares Analysis
Noise
Fluorescence
Photons
Publications
Fluorescence Spectrometry

Keywords

  • least-squares deconvolution
  • noise modeling
  • time-resolved fluorescence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Reply to Comment : 'A novel method for fast and robust estimation of fluorescence decay dynamics using constrained least-square deconvolution with Laguerre expansion'. / Ma, Dinglongw; Liu, Jing; Qi, Jinyi; Marcu, Laura.

In: Physics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 62, No. 4, 01.02.2017, p. 1637-1641.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cb1522b7f9094f7d8a2a89501d56de1b,
title = "Reply to Comment: 'A novel method for fast and robust estimation of fluorescence decay dynamics using constrained least-square deconvolution with Laguerre expansion'",
abstract = "In this response we underscore that the instrumentation described in the original publication (Liu et al 2012 Phys. Med. Biol. 57 843-65) was based on pulse-sampling technique, while the comment by Zhang et al is based on the assumption that a time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC) instrumentation was used. Therefore the arguments made in the comment are not applicable to the noise model reported by Liu et al. As reported in the literature (Lakowicz 2006 Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy (New York: Springer)), while in the TCSPC the experimental noise can be estimated from Poisson statistics, such an assumption is not valid for pulse-sampling (transient recording) techniques. To further clarify this aspect, we present here a comprehensive noise model describing the signal and noise propagation of the pulse sampling time-resolved fluorescence detection. Experimental data recorded in various conditions are analyzed as a case study to demonstrate the noise model of our instrumental system. In addition, regarding the statement of correcting equation (3) in Liu et al (2012 Phys. Med. Biol. 57 843-65), the notation of discrete time Laguerre function in the original publication was clear and consistent with literature conventions (Marmarelis 1993 Ann. Biomed. Eng. 21 573-89, Westwick and Kearney 2003 Identification of Nonlinear Physiological Systems (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley)). Thus, it does not require revision.",
keywords = "least-squares deconvolution, noise modeling, time-resolved fluorescence",
author = "Dinglongw Ma and Jing Liu and Jinyi Qi and Laura Marcu",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1088/1361-6560/aa5231",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
pages = "1637--1641",
journal = "Physics in Medicine and Biology",
issn = "0031-9155",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to Comment

T2 - 'A novel method for fast and robust estimation of fluorescence decay dynamics using constrained least-square deconvolution with Laguerre expansion'

AU - Ma, Dinglongw

AU - Liu, Jing

AU - Qi, Jinyi

AU - Marcu, Laura

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - In this response we underscore that the instrumentation described in the original publication (Liu et al 2012 Phys. Med. Biol. 57 843-65) was based on pulse-sampling technique, while the comment by Zhang et al is based on the assumption that a time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC) instrumentation was used. Therefore the arguments made in the comment are not applicable to the noise model reported by Liu et al. As reported in the literature (Lakowicz 2006 Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy (New York: Springer)), while in the TCSPC the experimental noise can be estimated from Poisson statistics, such an assumption is not valid for pulse-sampling (transient recording) techniques. To further clarify this aspect, we present here a comprehensive noise model describing the signal and noise propagation of the pulse sampling time-resolved fluorescence detection. Experimental data recorded in various conditions are analyzed as a case study to demonstrate the noise model of our instrumental system. In addition, regarding the statement of correcting equation (3) in Liu et al (2012 Phys. Med. Biol. 57 843-65), the notation of discrete time Laguerre function in the original publication was clear and consistent with literature conventions (Marmarelis 1993 Ann. Biomed. Eng. 21 573-89, Westwick and Kearney 2003 Identification of Nonlinear Physiological Systems (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley)). Thus, it does not require revision.

AB - In this response we underscore that the instrumentation described in the original publication (Liu et al 2012 Phys. Med. Biol. 57 843-65) was based on pulse-sampling technique, while the comment by Zhang et al is based on the assumption that a time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC) instrumentation was used. Therefore the arguments made in the comment are not applicable to the noise model reported by Liu et al. As reported in the literature (Lakowicz 2006 Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy (New York: Springer)), while in the TCSPC the experimental noise can be estimated from Poisson statistics, such an assumption is not valid for pulse-sampling (transient recording) techniques. To further clarify this aspect, we present here a comprehensive noise model describing the signal and noise propagation of the pulse sampling time-resolved fluorescence detection. Experimental data recorded in various conditions are analyzed as a case study to demonstrate the noise model of our instrumental system. In addition, regarding the statement of correcting equation (3) in Liu et al (2012 Phys. Med. Biol. 57 843-65), the notation of discrete time Laguerre function in the original publication was clear and consistent with literature conventions (Marmarelis 1993 Ann. Biomed. Eng. 21 573-89, Westwick and Kearney 2003 Identification of Nonlinear Physiological Systems (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley)). Thus, it does not require revision.

KW - least-squares deconvolution

KW - noise modeling

KW - time-resolved fluorescence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012093978&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85012093978&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/1361-6560/aa5231

DO - 10.1088/1361-6560/aa5231

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 1637

EP - 1641

JO - Physics in Medicine and Biology

JF - Physics in Medicine and Biology

SN - 0031-9155

IS - 4

ER -