Repeatability and accuracy testing of a weight distribution platform and comparison to a pressure sensitive walkway to assess static weight distribution

Georgia Bosscher, Andrea Tomas, Simon C. Roe, Denis J Marcellin-Little, B. Duncan X. Lascelles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy and repeatability of measurements collected using a weight distribution platform and a pressure sensitive walkway using an inanimate object with known weight distribution. Methods: A custom-built jig with a range of weights was applied in a random order. Measurements were collected on both devices and compared to each other and to the known weight distribution. Results: Weight distribution platform and pressure sensitive walkway measurements were highly correlated to each other (Pear-son’s correlation coefficient R = 0.98) and to actual weights (R = 0.99 for the weight distribution platform; 0.98 for the pressure sensitive walkway). Repeatability from day to day for both devices was greater than 0.99. For the weight distribution platform, the 95% confidence interval was ± 2.5% from the true percentage and ± 3.3% for the pressure sensitive walkway. The coefficient of variation (COV) was highest for both devices at the lightest weights (weight distribution platform 11.28%, pressure sensitive walkway 16.91%) and lowest with the heaviest weights (weight distribution platform 3.71%, pressure sensitive walkway 5.86%). Conclusion: Both the weight distribution platform and the pressure sensitive walkway provided accurate and consistent measures of weight distribution with no significant difference between devices. The rounded standard error was three percent for the weight distribution platform, and four percent for the pressure sensitive walkway. The higher variability when measuring the smallest weight suggests less accuracy at lower weights with both devices. Clinical significance: The weight distribution platform is a repeatable and accessible device to measure static weight distribution, and if proven the same in a clinical setting, it will be a valuable addition to current objective measures of limb use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)160-164
Number of pages5
JournalVeterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

repeatability
Pressure
Weights and Measures
testing
Equipment and Supplies
metrology
Pyrus
pears
confidence interval

Keywords

  • Pressure sensitive walkway
  • Repeatability
  • Static weight distribution
  • Weight distribution platform

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Repeatability and accuracy testing of a weight distribution platform and comparison to a pressure sensitive walkway to assess static weight distribution. / Bosscher, Georgia; Tomas, Andrea; Roe, Simon C.; Marcellin-Little, Denis J; Lascelles, B. Duncan X.

In: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Vol. 30, No. 2, 01.01.2017, p. 160-164.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{58f1dcda33c6459c97f49aa7c8c2c00a,
title = "Repeatability and accuracy testing of a weight distribution platform and comparison to a pressure sensitive walkway to assess static weight distribution",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate the accuracy and repeatability of measurements collected using a weight distribution platform and a pressure sensitive walkway using an inanimate object with known weight distribution. Methods: A custom-built jig with a range of weights was applied in a random order. Measurements were collected on both devices and compared to each other and to the known weight distribution. Results: Weight distribution platform and pressure sensitive walkway measurements were highly correlated to each other (Pear-son’s correlation coefficient R = 0.98) and to actual weights (R = 0.99 for the weight distribution platform; 0.98 for the pressure sensitive walkway). Repeatability from day to day for both devices was greater than 0.99. For the weight distribution platform, the 95{\%} confidence interval was ± 2.5{\%} from the true percentage and ± 3.3{\%} for the pressure sensitive walkway. The coefficient of variation (COV) was highest for both devices at the lightest weights (weight distribution platform 11.28{\%}, pressure sensitive walkway 16.91{\%}) and lowest with the heaviest weights (weight distribution platform 3.71{\%}, pressure sensitive walkway 5.86{\%}). Conclusion: Both the weight distribution platform and the pressure sensitive walkway provided accurate and consistent measures of weight distribution with no significant difference between devices. The rounded standard error was three percent for the weight distribution platform, and four percent for the pressure sensitive walkway. The higher variability when measuring the smallest weight suggests less accuracy at lower weights with both devices. Clinical significance: The weight distribution platform is a repeatable and accessible device to measure static weight distribution, and if proven the same in a clinical setting, it will be a valuable addition to current objective measures of limb use.",
keywords = "Pressure sensitive walkway, Repeatability, Static weight distribution, Weight distribution platform",
author = "Georgia Bosscher and Andrea Tomas and Roe, {Simon C.} and Marcellin-Little, {Denis J} and Lascelles, {B. Duncan X.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3415/VCOT-16-09-0128",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "160--164",
journal = "Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology",
issn = "0932-0814",
publisher = "Schattauer GmbH",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Repeatability and accuracy testing of a weight distribution platform and comparison to a pressure sensitive walkway to assess static weight distribution

AU - Bosscher, Georgia

AU - Tomas, Andrea

AU - Roe, Simon C.

AU - Marcellin-Little, Denis J

AU - Lascelles, B. Duncan X.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Objective: To evaluate the accuracy and repeatability of measurements collected using a weight distribution platform and a pressure sensitive walkway using an inanimate object with known weight distribution. Methods: A custom-built jig with a range of weights was applied in a random order. Measurements were collected on both devices and compared to each other and to the known weight distribution. Results: Weight distribution platform and pressure sensitive walkway measurements were highly correlated to each other (Pear-son’s correlation coefficient R = 0.98) and to actual weights (R = 0.99 for the weight distribution platform; 0.98 for the pressure sensitive walkway). Repeatability from day to day for both devices was greater than 0.99. For the weight distribution platform, the 95% confidence interval was ± 2.5% from the true percentage and ± 3.3% for the pressure sensitive walkway. The coefficient of variation (COV) was highest for both devices at the lightest weights (weight distribution platform 11.28%, pressure sensitive walkway 16.91%) and lowest with the heaviest weights (weight distribution platform 3.71%, pressure sensitive walkway 5.86%). Conclusion: Both the weight distribution platform and the pressure sensitive walkway provided accurate and consistent measures of weight distribution with no significant difference between devices. The rounded standard error was three percent for the weight distribution platform, and four percent for the pressure sensitive walkway. The higher variability when measuring the smallest weight suggests less accuracy at lower weights with both devices. Clinical significance: The weight distribution platform is a repeatable and accessible device to measure static weight distribution, and if proven the same in a clinical setting, it will be a valuable addition to current objective measures of limb use.

AB - Objective: To evaluate the accuracy and repeatability of measurements collected using a weight distribution platform and a pressure sensitive walkway using an inanimate object with known weight distribution. Methods: A custom-built jig with a range of weights was applied in a random order. Measurements were collected on both devices and compared to each other and to the known weight distribution. Results: Weight distribution platform and pressure sensitive walkway measurements were highly correlated to each other (Pear-son’s correlation coefficient R = 0.98) and to actual weights (R = 0.99 for the weight distribution platform; 0.98 for the pressure sensitive walkway). Repeatability from day to day for both devices was greater than 0.99. For the weight distribution platform, the 95% confidence interval was ± 2.5% from the true percentage and ± 3.3% for the pressure sensitive walkway. The coefficient of variation (COV) was highest for both devices at the lightest weights (weight distribution platform 11.28%, pressure sensitive walkway 16.91%) and lowest with the heaviest weights (weight distribution platform 3.71%, pressure sensitive walkway 5.86%). Conclusion: Both the weight distribution platform and the pressure sensitive walkway provided accurate and consistent measures of weight distribution with no significant difference between devices. The rounded standard error was three percent for the weight distribution platform, and four percent for the pressure sensitive walkway. The higher variability when measuring the smallest weight suggests less accuracy at lower weights with both devices. Clinical significance: The weight distribution platform is a repeatable and accessible device to measure static weight distribution, and if proven the same in a clinical setting, it will be a valuable addition to current objective measures of limb use.

KW - Pressure sensitive walkway

KW - Repeatability

KW - Static weight distribution

KW - Weight distribution platform

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019206405&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019206405&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3415/VCOT-16-09-0128

DO - 10.3415/VCOT-16-09-0128

M3 - Article

C2 - 28094423

AN - SCOPUS:85019206405

VL - 30

SP - 160

EP - 164

JO - Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

JF - Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

SN - 0932-0814

IS - 2

ER -