Reliability of the histopathologic diagnosis of keratinocyte carcinomas

Jared Jagdeo, Martin A. Weinstock, Michael Piepkorn, Stephen F. Bingham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: We sought to determine the interobserver reliability of the histopathologic diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (keratinocyte carcinomas) in the setting of a Department of Veteran Affairs multicenter chemoprevention study. Methods: Interobserver concordance was assessed by blinded review of histopathologic slides by study dermatopathologists. Results: Overall interobserver agreement between the two dermatopathogists was κ = 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.69). The dermatopathologists' interobserver agreement was highest for basal cell carcinoma at κ = 0.88 (95% CI 0.84-0.91) and for a diagnostic category in the SCC-actinic keratosis spectrum at κ = 0.80 (95% CI 0.73-0.86). The largest disagreements between the two reference dermatopathologists were regarding the categories of invasive SCC at κ = 0.62 (95% CI 0.52-0.72), SCC in situ at κ = 0.42 (95% CI 0.29-0.56), and actinic keratosis at κ = 0.51 (95% CI 0.40-0.62). Agreement between the local pathologists and central reference dermatopathologists were similar to the agreement between the central dermatopathologists. The morphea subtype of basal cell carcinoma was the only reliably diagnosed subtype (κ = 0.79, 95% CI 0.51-1.00), and tumor depth was reliably measured. Limitations: A limitation of this study was the use of only two reference dermatopathologists. Conclusion: Because of the impact on physician decision making and patient care, researchers and clinicians need to be aware of reliability of histopathology results, particularly pertaining to the SCC and actinic keratosis spectrum.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)279-284
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume57
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Keratinocytes
Confidence Intervals
Carcinoma
Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Basal Cell Carcinoma
Actinic Keratosis
Localized Scleroderma
Carcinoma in Situ
Chemoprevention
Veterans
Reproducibility of Results
Multicenter Studies
Decision Making
Patient Care
Research Personnel
Physicians
Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology

Cite this

Reliability of the histopathologic diagnosis of keratinocyte carcinomas. / Jagdeo, Jared; Weinstock, Martin A.; Piepkorn, Michael; Bingham, Stephen F.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, Vol. 57, No. 2, 08.2007, p. 279-284.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jagdeo, Jared ; Weinstock, Martin A. ; Piepkorn, Michael ; Bingham, Stephen F. / Reliability of the histopathologic diagnosis of keratinocyte carcinomas. In: Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2007 ; Vol. 57, No. 2. pp. 279-284.
@article{d4f3c715a6fc4f4fa45b33817c28a07f,
title = "Reliability of the histopathologic diagnosis of keratinocyte carcinomas",
abstract = "Objective: We sought to determine the interobserver reliability of the histopathologic diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (keratinocyte carcinomas) in the setting of a Department of Veteran Affairs multicenter chemoprevention study. Methods: Interobserver concordance was assessed by blinded review of histopathologic slides by study dermatopathologists. Results: Overall interobserver agreement between the two dermatopathogists was κ = 0.69 (95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.69). The dermatopathologists' interobserver agreement was highest for basal cell carcinoma at κ = 0.88 (95{\%} CI 0.84-0.91) and for a diagnostic category in the SCC-actinic keratosis spectrum at κ = 0.80 (95{\%} CI 0.73-0.86). The largest disagreements between the two reference dermatopathologists were regarding the categories of invasive SCC at κ = 0.62 (95{\%} CI 0.52-0.72), SCC in situ at κ = 0.42 (95{\%} CI 0.29-0.56), and actinic keratosis at κ = 0.51 (95{\%} CI 0.40-0.62). Agreement between the local pathologists and central reference dermatopathologists were similar to the agreement between the central dermatopathologists. The morphea subtype of basal cell carcinoma was the only reliably diagnosed subtype (κ = 0.79, 95{\%} CI 0.51-1.00), and tumor depth was reliably measured. Limitations: A limitation of this study was the use of only two reference dermatopathologists. Conclusion: Because of the impact on physician decision making and patient care, researchers and clinicians need to be aware of reliability of histopathology results, particularly pertaining to the SCC and actinic keratosis spectrum.",
author = "Jared Jagdeo and Weinstock, {Martin A.} and Michael Piepkorn and Bingham, {Stephen F.}",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.jaad.2007.03.021",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "279--284",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology",
issn = "0190-9622",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability of the histopathologic diagnosis of keratinocyte carcinomas

AU - Jagdeo, Jared

AU - Weinstock, Martin A.

AU - Piepkorn, Michael

AU - Bingham, Stephen F.

PY - 2007/8

Y1 - 2007/8

N2 - Objective: We sought to determine the interobserver reliability of the histopathologic diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (keratinocyte carcinomas) in the setting of a Department of Veteran Affairs multicenter chemoprevention study. Methods: Interobserver concordance was assessed by blinded review of histopathologic slides by study dermatopathologists. Results: Overall interobserver agreement between the two dermatopathogists was κ = 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.69). The dermatopathologists' interobserver agreement was highest for basal cell carcinoma at κ = 0.88 (95% CI 0.84-0.91) and for a diagnostic category in the SCC-actinic keratosis spectrum at κ = 0.80 (95% CI 0.73-0.86). The largest disagreements between the two reference dermatopathologists were regarding the categories of invasive SCC at κ = 0.62 (95% CI 0.52-0.72), SCC in situ at κ = 0.42 (95% CI 0.29-0.56), and actinic keratosis at κ = 0.51 (95% CI 0.40-0.62). Agreement between the local pathologists and central reference dermatopathologists were similar to the agreement between the central dermatopathologists. The morphea subtype of basal cell carcinoma was the only reliably diagnosed subtype (κ = 0.79, 95% CI 0.51-1.00), and tumor depth was reliably measured. Limitations: A limitation of this study was the use of only two reference dermatopathologists. Conclusion: Because of the impact on physician decision making and patient care, researchers and clinicians need to be aware of reliability of histopathology results, particularly pertaining to the SCC and actinic keratosis spectrum.

AB - Objective: We sought to determine the interobserver reliability of the histopathologic diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (keratinocyte carcinomas) in the setting of a Department of Veteran Affairs multicenter chemoprevention study. Methods: Interobserver concordance was assessed by blinded review of histopathologic slides by study dermatopathologists. Results: Overall interobserver agreement between the two dermatopathogists was κ = 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.69). The dermatopathologists' interobserver agreement was highest for basal cell carcinoma at κ = 0.88 (95% CI 0.84-0.91) and for a diagnostic category in the SCC-actinic keratosis spectrum at κ = 0.80 (95% CI 0.73-0.86). The largest disagreements between the two reference dermatopathologists were regarding the categories of invasive SCC at κ = 0.62 (95% CI 0.52-0.72), SCC in situ at κ = 0.42 (95% CI 0.29-0.56), and actinic keratosis at κ = 0.51 (95% CI 0.40-0.62). Agreement between the local pathologists and central reference dermatopathologists were similar to the agreement between the central dermatopathologists. The morphea subtype of basal cell carcinoma was the only reliably diagnosed subtype (κ = 0.79, 95% CI 0.51-1.00), and tumor depth was reliably measured. Limitations: A limitation of this study was the use of only two reference dermatopathologists. Conclusion: Because of the impact on physician decision making and patient care, researchers and clinicians need to be aware of reliability of histopathology results, particularly pertaining to the SCC and actinic keratosis spectrum.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34447281502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34447281502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.03.021

DO - 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.03.021

M3 - Article

C2 - 17482716

AN - SCOPUS:34447281502

VL - 57

SP - 279

EP - 284

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

SN - 0190-9622

IS - 2

ER -