Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke

Ulla Britt Flansbjer, Anna Maria Holmbäck, David Downham, Carolynn Patten, Jan Lexell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

550 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To assess the reliability of 6 gait performance tests in individuals with chronic mild to moderate post-stroke hemiparesis. Design: An intra-rater (between occasions) test-retest reliability study. Subjects: Fifty men and women (mean age 58 ± 6.4 years) 6-46 months post-stroke. Methods: The Timed "Up & Go" test, the Comfortable and the Fast Gait Speed tests, the Stair Climbing ascend and descend tests and the 6-Minute Walk test were assessed 7 days apart. Reliability was evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1), the Bland & Altman analysis, the standard error of measurement (SEM and SEM%) and the smallest real difference (SRD and SRD%). Results: Test-retest agreements were high (ICC2,1 0.94-0.99) with no discernible systematic differences between the tests. The standard error of measurement (SEM%), representing the smallest change that indicates a real (clinical) improvement for a group of individuals, was small (<9%). The smallest real difference (SRD%), representing the smallest change that indicates a real (clinical) improvement for a single individual, was also small (13-23%). Conclusion: These commonly used gait performance tests are highly reliable and can be recommended to evaluate improvements in various aspects of gait performance in individuals with chronic mild to moderate hemiparesis after stroke.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)75-82
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Volume37
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Paresis
Gait
Stroke
Reproducibility of Results

Keywords

  • Activities of daily living
  • Cerebrovascular accident
  • Gait
  • Outcome assessment
  • Rehabilitation
  • Reproductivity of results
  • Research design
  • Walking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. / Flansbjer, Ulla Britt; Holmbäck, Anna Maria; Downham, David; Patten, Carolynn; Lexell, Jan.

In: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol. 37, No. 2, 01.03.2005, p. 75-82.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Flansbjer, Ulla Britt ; Holmbäck, Anna Maria ; Downham, David ; Patten, Carolynn ; Lexell, Jan. / Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. In: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2005 ; Vol. 37, No. 2. pp. 75-82.
@article{42347345d84c4f4284bd323f73433b87,
title = "Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke",
abstract = "Objective: To assess the reliability of 6 gait performance tests in individuals with chronic mild to moderate post-stroke hemiparesis. Design: An intra-rater (between occasions) test-retest reliability study. Subjects: Fifty men and women (mean age 58 ± 6.4 years) 6-46 months post-stroke. Methods: The Timed {"}Up & Go{"} test, the Comfortable and the Fast Gait Speed tests, the Stair Climbing ascend and descend tests and the 6-Minute Walk test were assessed 7 days apart. Reliability was evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1), the Bland & Altman analysis, the standard error of measurement (SEM and SEM{\%}) and the smallest real difference (SRD and SRD{\%}). Results: Test-retest agreements were high (ICC2,1 0.94-0.99) with no discernible systematic differences between the tests. The standard error of measurement (SEM{\%}), representing the smallest change that indicates a real (clinical) improvement for a group of individuals, was small (<9{\%}). The smallest real difference (SRD{\%}), representing the smallest change that indicates a real (clinical) improvement for a single individual, was also small (13-23{\%}). Conclusion: These commonly used gait performance tests are highly reliable and can be recommended to evaluate improvements in various aspects of gait performance in individuals with chronic mild to moderate hemiparesis after stroke.",
keywords = "Activities of daily living, Cerebrovascular accident, Gait, Outcome assessment, Rehabilitation, Reproductivity of results, Research design, Walking",
author = "Flansbjer, {Ulla Britt} and Holmb{\"a}ck, {Anna Maria} and David Downham and Carolynn Patten and Jan Lexell",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/16501970410017215",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "75--82",
journal = "Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine",
issn = "1650-1977",
publisher = "Foundation for Rehabilitation Information",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke

AU - Flansbjer, Ulla Britt

AU - Holmbäck, Anna Maria

AU - Downham, David

AU - Patten, Carolynn

AU - Lexell, Jan

PY - 2005/3/1

Y1 - 2005/3/1

N2 - Objective: To assess the reliability of 6 gait performance tests in individuals with chronic mild to moderate post-stroke hemiparesis. Design: An intra-rater (between occasions) test-retest reliability study. Subjects: Fifty men and women (mean age 58 ± 6.4 years) 6-46 months post-stroke. Methods: The Timed "Up & Go" test, the Comfortable and the Fast Gait Speed tests, the Stair Climbing ascend and descend tests and the 6-Minute Walk test were assessed 7 days apart. Reliability was evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1), the Bland & Altman analysis, the standard error of measurement (SEM and SEM%) and the smallest real difference (SRD and SRD%). Results: Test-retest agreements were high (ICC2,1 0.94-0.99) with no discernible systematic differences between the tests. The standard error of measurement (SEM%), representing the smallest change that indicates a real (clinical) improvement for a group of individuals, was small (<9%). The smallest real difference (SRD%), representing the smallest change that indicates a real (clinical) improvement for a single individual, was also small (13-23%). Conclusion: These commonly used gait performance tests are highly reliable and can be recommended to evaluate improvements in various aspects of gait performance in individuals with chronic mild to moderate hemiparesis after stroke.

AB - Objective: To assess the reliability of 6 gait performance tests in individuals with chronic mild to moderate post-stroke hemiparesis. Design: An intra-rater (between occasions) test-retest reliability study. Subjects: Fifty men and women (mean age 58 ± 6.4 years) 6-46 months post-stroke. Methods: The Timed "Up & Go" test, the Comfortable and the Fast Gait Speed tests, the Stair Climbing ascend and descend tests and the 6-Minute Walk test were assessed 7 days apart. Reliability was evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1), the Bland & Altman analysis, the standard error of measurement (SEM and SEM%) and the smallest real difference (SRD and SRD%). Results: Test-retest agreements were high (ICC2,1 0.94-0.99) with no discernible systematic differences between the tests. The standard error of measurement (SEM%), representing the smallest change that indicates a real (clinical) improvement for a group of individuals, was small (<9%). The smallest real difference (SRD%), representing the smallest change that indicates a real (clinical) improvement for a single individual, was also small (13-23%). Conclusion: These commonly used gait performance tests are highly reliable and can be recommended to evaluate improvements in various aspects of gait performance in individuals with chronic mild to moderate hemiparesis after stroke.

KW - Activities of daily living

KW - Cerebrovascular accident

KW - Gait

KW - Outcome assessment

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Reproductivity of results

KW - Research design

KW - Walking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=15944388586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=15944388586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/16501970410017215

DO - 10.1080/16501970410017215

M3 - Article

C2 - 15788341

AN - SCOPUS:15944388586

VL - 37

SP - 75

EP - 82

JO - Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

JF - Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

SN - 1650-1977

IS - 2

ER -