Reliability and Validity of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in Studies of Autism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

186 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Three studies were conducted with the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) with autistic individuals. In Study 1, it was found that the traditional WCST is a highly reliable test for use with both autistic children and children with learning disabilities over time. In Study 2, the equivalence of the standard and computerized versions of the WCST was examined. Low-to-moderate alternate format reliability for both autistic and nonautistic samples was revealed. Study 3 dealt with group differences in performance as a function of WCST format. Although autistic children were significantly impaired relative to controls on the standard WCST, group differences on the computerized version of the test were attenuated. Autistic children tended to perform better on the computer than with the traditional format, suggesting that alternative forms of the test are not equivalent for this group. The potential contribution of social-motivational factors to this finding is discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)491-500
Number of pages10
JournalNeuropsychology
Volume9
Issue number4
StatePublished - Oct 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Autistic Disorder
Reproducibility of Results
Learning Disorders
Disabled Children

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Biological Psychiatry

Cite this

Reliability and Validity of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in Studies of Autism. / Ozonoff, Sally J.

In: Neuropsychology, Vol. 9, No. 4, 10.1995, p. 491-500.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{64b28a63ec404db0a81c5800d5dc39c8,
title = "Reliability and Validity of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in Studies of Autism",
abstract = "Three studies were conducted with the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) with autistic individuals. In Study 1, it was found that the traditional WCST is a highly reliable test for use with both autistic children and children with learning disabilities over time. In Study 2, the equivalence of the standard and computerized versions of the WCST was examined. Low-to-moderate alternate format reliability for both autistic and nonautistic samples was revealed. Study 3 dealt with group differences in performance as a function of WCST format. Although autistic children were significantly impaired relative to controls on the standard WCST, group differences on the computerized version of the test were attenuated. Autistic children tended to perform better on the computer than with the traditional format, suggesting that alternative forms of the test are not equivalent for this group. The potential contribution of social-motivational factors to this finding is discussed.",
author = "Ozonoff, {Sally J}",
year = "1995",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "491--500",
journal = "Neuropsychology",
issn = "0894-4105",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability and Validity of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in Studies of Autism

AU - Ozonoff, Sally J

PY - 1995/10

Y1 - 1995/10

N2 - Three studies were conducted with the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) with autistic individuals. In Study 1, it was found that the traditional WCST is a highly reliable test for use with both autistic children and children with learning disabilities over time. In Study 2, the equivalence of the standard and computerized versions of the WCST was examined. Low-to-moderate alternate format reliability for both autistic and nonautistic samples was revealed. Study 3 dealt with group differences in performance as a function of WCST format. Although autistic children were significantly impaired relative to controls on the standard WCST, group differences on the computerized version of the test were attenuated. Autistic children tended to perform better on the computer than with the traditional format, suggesting that alternative forms of the test are not equivalent for this group. The potential contribution of social-motivational factors to this finding is discussed.

AB - Three studies were conducted with the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) with autistic individuals. In Study 1, it was found that the traditional WCST is a highly reliable test for use with both autistic children and children with learning disabilities over time. In Study 2, the equivalence of the standard and computerized versions of the WCST was examined. Low-to-moderate alternate format reliability for both autistic and nonautistic samples was revealed. Study 3 dealt with group differences in performance as a function of WCST format. Although autistic children were significantly impaired relative to controls on the standard WCST, group differences on the computerized version of the test were attenuated. Autistic children tended to perform better on the computer than with the traditional format, suggesting that alternative forms of the test are not equivalent for this group. The potential contribution of social-motivational factors to this finding is discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028891959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028891959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0028891959

VL - 9

SP - 491

EP - 500

JO - Neuropsychology

JF - Neuropsychology

SN - 0894-4105

IS - 4

ER -