Relative vulnerability of coyotes to removal methods on a northern California ranch

Benjamin Sacks, Karen M. Blejwas, Michael M. Jaeger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evidence suggests that predation on domestic sheep by coyotes (Canis latrans) is caused primarily by breeding pairs with territories overlapping sheep. Accordingly, we investigated vulnerability of coyotes to removal methods relative to factors associated with reproduction and territoriality. We collected live and lethal coyote capture data during April 1993-February 1998 on a north-coastal California sheep ranch. Routine coyote removal was conducted in response to sheep depredation before and during (part of) the study. Younger (nonbreeding) coyotes generally were more vulnerable to capture than older (potentially breeding) individuals, although age bias varied among removal methods. Recaptures of radiocollared coyotes in foothold traps and snares indicated a bias toward progressively younger individuals (juv > yearling > ad; P = 0.002). Proportionally more juvenile and yearling coyotes were removed by M-44s (sodium cyanide ejectors) than by traps and snares (P = 0.016). We found no difference between traps and snares in the ages of coyotes taken (P = 0.50). Vulnerability of younger coyotes was likely elevated by lack of experience and more time spent in unfamiliar areas where they were least able to avoid capture devices. Coyotes were caught more often than expected outside of core areas of their territories with both traps (P = 0.001) and snares (P = 0.02). Older coyotes were most vulnerable in spring and summer when rearing pups, after most depredation occurred. Radiocollared breeders (P = 0.012) and uncollared coyotes of breeding age (P = 0.052) were captured less often during the non-pup-rearing period than the pup-rearing period. These results suggest conventional control in northern California is poorly suited to the segment of the coyote population killing the most sheep, particularly during the time of year when most sheep depredation occurs. Efficacy of control methods might be improved by conservative use of conventional devices to minimize learned avoidance by coyotes, and by greater reliance on methods such as livestock protection collars that are specific to depredating individuals throughout the year.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)939-949
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Wildlife Management
Volume63
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1999

Fingerprint

Canis latrans
ranching
sheep
vulnerability
rearing
breeding
methodology
traps
territoriality
cyanide
removal
method
livestock
yearlings
predation
pups
sodium
summer
young
cyanides

Keywords

  • Breeding
  • California
  • Canis latrans
  • Control
  • Coyote
  • Depredation
  • M-44
  • Removal
  • Sheep
  • Snare
  • Trap
  • Vulnerabilit y

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Relative vulnerability of coyotes to removal methods on a northern California ranch. / Sacks, Benjamin; Blejwas, Karen M.; Jaeger, Michael M.

In: Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 63, No. 3, 01.01.1999, p. 939-949.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sacks, Benjamin ; Blejwas, Karen M. ; Jaeger, Michael M. / Relative vulnerability of coyotes to removal methods on a northern California ranch. In: Journal of Wildlife Management. 1999 ; Vol. 63, No. 3. pp. 939-949.
@article{a746402e363949d6a073b4504a1dc1ce,
title = "Relative vulnerability of coyotes to removal methods on a northern California ranch",
abstract = "Evidence suggests that predation on domestic sheep by coyotes (Canis latrans) is caused primarily by breeding pairs with territories overlapping sheep. Accordingly, we investigated vulnerability of coyotes to removal methods relative to factors associated with reproduction and territoriality. We collected live and lethal coyote capture data during April 1993-February 1998 on a north-coastal California sheep ranch. Routine coyote removal was conducted in response to sheep depredation before and during (part of) the study. Younger (nonbreeding) coyotes generally were more vulnerable to capture than older (potentially breeding) individuals, although age bias varied among removal methods. Recaptures of radiocollared coyotes in foothold traps and snares indicated a bias toward progressively younger individuals (juv > yearling > ad; P = 0.002). Proportionally more juvenile and yearling coyotes were removed by M-44s (sodium cyanide ejectors) than by traps and snares (P = 0.016). We found no difference between traps and snares in the ages of coyotes taken (P = 0.50). Vulnerability of younger coyotes was likely elevated by lack of experience and more time spent in unfamiliar areas where they were least able to avoid capture devices. Coyotes were caught more often than expected outside of core areas of their territories with both traps (P = 0.001) and snares (P = 0.02). Older coyotes were most vulnerable in spring and summer when rearing pups, after most depredation occurred. Radiocollared breeders (P = 0.012) and uncollared coyotes of breeding age (P = 0.052) were captured less often during the non-pup-rearing period than the pup-rearing period. These results suggest conventional control in northern California is poorly suited to the segment of the coyote population killing the most sheep, particularly during the time of year when most sheep depredation occurs. Efficacy of control methods might be improved by conservative use of conventional devices to minimize learned avoidance by coyotes, and by greater reliance on methods such as livestock protection collars that are specific to depredating individuals throughout the year.",
keywords = "Breeding, California, Canis latrans, Control, Coyote, Depredation, M-44, Removal, Sheep, Snare, Trap, Vulnerabilit y",
author = "Benjamin Sacks and Blejwas, {Karen M.} and Jaeger, {Michael M.}",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2307/3802808",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "939--949",
journal = "Journal of Wildlife Management",
issn = "0022-541X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relative vulnerability of coyotes to removal methods on a northern California ranch

AU - Sacks, Benjamin

AU - Blejwas, Karen M.

AU - Jaeger, Michael M.

PY - 1999/1/1

Y1 - 1999/1/1

N2 - Evidence suggests that predation on domestic sheep by coyotes (Canis latrans) is caused primarily by breeding pairs with territories overlapping sheep. Accordingly, we investigated vulnerability of coyotes to removal methods relative to factors associated with reproduction and territoriality. We collected live and lethal coyote capture data during April 1993-February 1998 on a north-coastal California sheep ranch. Routine coyote removal was conducted in response to sheep depredation before and during (part of) the study. Younger (nonbreeding) coyotes generally were more vulnerable to capture than older (potentially breeding) individuals, although age bias varied among removal methods. Recaptures of radiocollared coyotes in foothold traps and snares indicated a bias toward progressively younger individuals (juv > yearling > ad; P = 0.002). Proportionally more juvenile and yearling coyotes were removed by M-44s (sodium cyanide ejectors) than by traps and snares (P = 0.016). We found no difference between traps and snares in the ages of coyotes taken (P = 0.50). Vulnerability of younger coyotes was likely elevated by lack of experience and more time spent in unfamiliar areas where they were least able to avoid capture devices. Coyotes were caught more often than expected outside of core areas of their territories with both traps (P = 0.001) and snares (P = 0.02). Older coyotes were most vulnerable in spring and summer when rearing pups, after most depredation occurred. Radiocollared breeders (P = 0.012) and uncollared coyotes of breeding age (P = 0.052) were captured less often during the non-pup-rearing period than the pup-rearing period. These results suggest conventional control in northern California is poorly suited to the segment of the coyote population killing the most sheep, particularly during the time of year when most sheep depredation occurs. Efficacy of control methods might be improved by conservative use of conventional devices to minimize learned avoidance by coyotes, and by greater reliance on methods such as livestock protection collars that are specific to depredating individuals throughout the year.

AB - Evidence suggests that predation on domestic sheep by coyotes (Canis latrans) is caused primarily by breeding pairs with territories overlapping sheep. Accordingly, we investigated vulnerability of coyotes to removal methods relative to factors associated with reproduction and territoriality. We collected live and lethal coyote capture data during April 1993-February 1998 on a north-coastal California sheep ranch. Routine coyote removal was conducted in response to sheep depredation before and during (part of) the study. Younger (nonbreeding) coyotes generally were more vulnerable to capture than older (potentially breeding) individuals, although age bias varied among removal methods. Recaptures of radiocollared coyotes in foothold traps and snares indicated a bias toward progressively younger individuals (juv > yearling > ad; P = 0.002). Proportionally more juvenile and yearling coyotes were removed by M-44s (sodium cyanide ejectors) than by traps and snares (P = 0.016). We found no difference between traps and snares in the ages of coyotes taken (P = 0.50). Vulnerability of younger coyotes was likely elevated by lack of experience and more time spent in unfamiliar areas where they were least able to avoid capture devices. Coyotes were caught more often than expected outside of core areas of their territories with both traps (P = 0.001) and snares (P = 0.02). Older coyotes were most vulnerable in spring and summer when rearing pups, after most depredation occurred. Radiocollared breeders (P = 0.012) and uncollared coyotes of breeding age (P = 0.052) were captured less often during the non-pup-rearing period than the pup-rearing period. These results suggest conventional control in northern California is poorly suited to the segment of the coyote population killing the most sheep, particularly during the time of year when most sheep depredation occurs. Efficacy of control methods might be improved by conservative use of conventional devices to minimize learned avoidance by coyotes, and by greater reliance on methods such as livestock protection collars that are specific to depredating individuals throughout the year.

KW - Breeding

KW - California

KW - Canis latrans

KW - Control

KW - Coyote

KW - Depredation

KW - M-44

KW - Removal

KW - Sheep

KW - Snare

KW - Trap

KW - Vulnerabilit y

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032781642&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032781642&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/3802808

DO - 10.2307/3802808

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032781642

VL - 63

SP - 939

EP - 949

JO - Journal of Wildlife Management

JF - Journal of Wildlife Management

SN - 0022-541X

IS - 3

ER -