Relative value units poorly correlate with measures of surgical effort and complexity

Dhruvil R. Shah, Richard J Bold, Anthony D. Yang, Vijay P. Khatri, Steve R. Martinez, Robert J Canter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The relationship between procedural relative value units (RVUs) for surgical procedures and other measures of surgeon effort are poorly characterized. We hypothesized that RVUs would poorly correlate with quantifiable metrics of surgeon effort. Methods Using the 2010 American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, we selected 11 primary current procedural terminology codes associated with high volume surgical procedures. We then identified all patients with a single reported procedural RVU who underwent nonemergent, inpatient general surgical operations. We used linear regression to correlate length of stay (LOS), operative time, overall morbidity, frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs), and mortality with RVUs. We used multivariable logistic regression using all preoperative NSQIP variables to determine other significant predictors of our outcome measures. Results Among 14,481 patients, RVUs poorly correlated with individual LOS (R2 = 0.05), operative time (R2 = 0.10), and mortality (R2 = 0.35). There was a moderate correlation between RVUs and SAEs (R2 = 0.79) and RVUs and overall morbidity (R 2 = 0.75). However, among low- to mid-level RVU procedures (11-35) there was a poor correlation between SAEs (R2 = 0.15), overall morbidity (R2 = 0.05), and RVUs. On multivariable analysis, RVUs were significant predictors of operative time, LOS, and SAEs (odds ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-1.07), but RVUs were not a significant predictor of mortality (odds ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.05). Conclusions For common, index general surgery procedures, the current RVU assignments poorly correlate with certain metrics of surgeon work, while moderately correlating with others. Given the increasing emphasis on measuring and tracking surgeon productivity, more objective measures of surgeon work and productivity should be developed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)465-470
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume190
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Operative Time
Length of Stay
Quality Improvement
Morbidity
Mortality
Odds Ratio
Current Procedural Terminology
Confidence Intervals
Inpatients
Linear Models
Logistic Models
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Surgeons
Databases

Keywords

  • Adverse events
  • Length of stay
  • Morbidity and mortality
  • Operative time
  • Relative value units

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Relative value units poorly correlate with measures of surgical effort and complexity. / Shah, Dhruvil R.; Bold, Richard J; Yang, Anthony D.; Khatri, Vijay P.; Martinez, Steve R.; Canter, Robert J.

In: Journal of Surgical Research, Vol. 190, No. 2, 2014, p. 465-470.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shah, Dhruvil R. ; Bold, Richard J ; Yang, Anthony D. ; Khatri, Vijay P. ; Martinez, Steve R. ; Canter, Robert J. / Relative value units poorly correlate with measures of surgical effort and complexity. In: Journal of Surgical Research. 2014 ; Vol. 190, No. 2. pp. 465-470.
@article{2b8d979d8fa74e7cae88a16224071533,
title = "Relative value units poorly correlate with measures of surgical effort and complexity",
abstract = "Background The relationship between procedural relative value units (RVUs) for surgical procedures and other measures of surgeon effort are poorly characterized. We hypothesized that RVUs would poorly correlate with quantifiable metrics of surgeon effort. Methods Using the 2010 American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, we selected 11 primary current procedural terminology codes associated with high volume surgical procedures. We then identified all patients with a single reported procedural RVU who underwent nonemergent, inpatient general surgical operations. We used linear regression to correlate length of stay (LOS), operative time, overall morbidity, frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs), and mortality with RVUs. We used multivariable logistic regression using all preoperative NSQIP variables to determine other significant predictors of our outcome measures. Results Among 14,481 patients, RVUs poorly correlated with individual LOS (R2 = 0.05), operative time (R2 = 0.10), and mortality (R2 = 0.35). There was a moderate correlation between RVUs and SAEs (R2 = 0.79) and RVUs and overall morbidity (R 2 = 0.75). However, among low- to mid-level RVU procedures (11-35) there was a poor correlation between SAEs (R2 = 0.15), overall morbidity (R2 = 0.05), and RVUs. On multivariable analysis, RVUs were significant predictors of operative time, LOS, and SAEs (odds ratio 1.06, 95{\%} confidence interval: 1.05-1.07), but RVUs were not a significant predictor of mortality (odds ratio 1.02, 95{\%} confidence interval: 0.99-1.05). Conclusions For common, index general surgery procedures, the current RVU assignments poorly correlate with certain metrics of surgeon work, while moderately correlating with others. Given the increasing emphasis on measuring and tracking surgeon productivity, more objective measures of surgeon work and productivity should be developed.",
keywords = "Adverse events, Length of stay, Morbidity and mortality, Operative time, Relative value units",
author = "Shah, {Dhruvil R.} and Bold, {Richard J} and Yang, {Anthony D.} and Khatri, {Vijay P.} and Martinez, {Steve R.} and Canter, {Robert J}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.jss.2014.05.052",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "190",
pages = "465--470",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Research",
issn = "0022-4804",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relative value units poorly correlate with measures of surgical effort and complexity

AU - Shah, Dhruvil R.

AU - Bold, Richard J

AU - Yang, Anthony D.

AU - Khatri, Vijay P.

AU - Martinez, Steve R.

AU - Canter, Robert J

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background The relationship between procedural relative value units (RVUs) for surgical procedures and other measures of surgeon effort are poorly characterized. We hypothesized that RVUs would poorly correlate with quantifiable metrics of surgeon effort. Methods Using the 2010 American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, we selected 11 primary current procedural terminology codes associated with high volume surgical procedures. We then identified all patients with a single reported procedural RVU who underwent nonemergent, inpatient general surgical operations. We used linear regression to correlate length of stay (LOS), operative time, overall morbidity, frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs), and mortality with RVUs. We used multivariable logistic regression using all preoperative NSQIP variables to determine other significant predictors of our outcome measures. Results Among 14,481 patients, RVUs poorly correlated with individual LOS (R2 = 0.05), operative time (R2 = 0.10), and mortality (R2 = 0.35). There was a moderate correlation between RVUs and SAEs (R2 = 0.79) and RVUs and overall morbidity (R 2 = 0.75). However, among low- to mid-level RVU procedures (11-35) there was a poor correlation between SAEs (R2 = 0.15), overall morbidity (R2 = 0.05), and RVUs. On multivariable analysis, RVUs were significant predictors of operative time, LOS, and SAEs (odds ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-1.07), but RVUs were not a significant predictor of mortality (odds ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.05). Conclusions For common, index general surgery procedures, the current RVU assignments poorly correlate with certain metrics of surgeon work, while moderately correlating with others. Given the increasing emphasis on measuring and tracking surgeon productivity, more objective measures of surgeon work and productivity should be developed.

AB - Background The relationship between procedural relative value units (RVUs) for surgical procedures and other measures of surgeon effort are poorly characterized. We hypothesized that RVUs would poorly correlate with quantifiable metrics of surgeon effort. Methods Using the 2010 American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, we selected 11 primary current procedural terminology codes associated with high volume surgical procedures. We then identified all patients with a single reported procedural RVU who underwent nonemergent, inpatient general surgical operations. We used linear regression to correlate length of stay (LOS), operative time, overall morbidity, frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs), and mortality with RVUs. We used multivariable logistic regression using all preoperative NSQIP variables to determine other significant predictors of our outcome measures. Results Among 14,481 patients, RVUs poorly correlated with individual LOS (R2 = 0.05), operative time (R2 = 0.10), and mortality (R2 = 0.35). There was a moderate correlation between RVUs and SAEs (R2 = 0.79) and RVUs and overall morbidity (R 2 = 0.75). However, among low- to mid-level RVU procedures (11-35) there was a poor correlation between SAEs (R2 = 0.15), overall morbidity (R2 = 0.05), and RVUs. On multivariable analysis, RVUs were significant predictors of operative time, LOS, and SAEs (odds ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-1.07), but RVUs were not a significant predictor of mortality (odds ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.05). Conclusions For common, index general surgery procedures, the current RVU assignments poorly correlate with certain metrics of surgeon work, while moderately correlating with others. Given the increasing emphasis on measuring and tracking surgeon productivity, more objective measures of surgeon work and productivity should be developed.

KW - Adverse events

KW - Length of stay

KW - Morbidity and mortality

KW - Operative time

KW - Relative value units

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904257087&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904257087&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2014.05.052

DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2014.05.052

M3 - Article

VL - 190

SP - 465

EP - 470

JO - Journal of Surgical Research

JF - Journal of Surgical Research

SN - 0022-4804

IS - 2

ER -