Relationship between trauma center volume and outcomes

Avery B. Nathens, Gregory Jurkovich, Ronald V. Maier, David C. Grossman, Ellen J. MacKenzie, Maria Moore, Frederick P. Rivara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

380 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: The premise underlying regionalization of trauma care is that larger volumes of trauma patients cared for in fewer institutions will lead to improved outcomes. However, whether a relationship exists between institutional volume and trauma outcomes remains unknown. Objective: To evaluate the association between trauma center volume and outcomes of trauma patients Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Thirty-one academic level I or level II trauma centers across the United States participating in the University Healthsystem Consortium Trauma Benchmarking Study. Patients: Consecutive patients with penetrating abdominal injury (PAI: n = 478) discharged between November 1, 1997, and Jury 31, 1998, or with multisystem blunt trauma (minimum of head injury and lower-extremity long-bone fractures: n = 541) discharged between June 1 and December 31, 1998. Main Outcome Measures: Inpatient mortality and hospital length of stay (LOS), comparing high-volume (>650 trauma admissions/y) and low-volume (≤650 admissions/y) centers. Results: After multivariate adjustment for patient characteristics and injury severity, the relative odds of death was 0.02 (95% confidence interval [Cl], 0.002-0.25) for patients with PAI admitted with shock to high-volume centers compared with low-volume centers. No benefit was evident in patients without shock (P = .50). The adjusted odds of death in patients with multisystem blunt trauma who presented with coma to a high-volume center was 0.49 (95% Cl, 0.26-0.93) vs low-volume centers. No benefit was observed in patients without coma (P = .05). Additionally, a shorter LOS was observed in patients with PAI and New Injury Severity Scores of 16 or higher (difference in adjusted mean LOS, 1.6 days [95% Cl, -1.5 to 4.7 days]) and in all patients with multisystem blunt trauma admitted to higher-volume centers (difference in adjusted mean LOS, 3.3 days [95% Cl, 0.91-5.70 days]). Conclusions: Our results indicate that a strong association exists between trauma center volume and outcomes, with significant improvements in mortality and LOS when volume exceeds 650 cases per year. These benefits are only evident in patients at high risk for adverse outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1164-1171
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Medical Association
Volume285
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 7 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Trauma Centers
Wounds and Injuries
Length of Stay
Coma
Shock
Benchmarking
Abdominal Injuries
Injury Severity Score
Mortality
Bone Fractures
Craniocerebral Trauma
Inpatients
Lower Extremity
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Odds Ratio
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Confidence Intervals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Nathens, A. B., Jurkovich, G., Maier, R. V., Grossman, D. C., MacKenzie, E. J., Moore, M., & Rivara, F. P. (2001). Relationship between trauma center volume and outcomes. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(9), 1164-1171. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.9.1164

Relationship between trauma center volume and outcomes. / Nathens, Avery B.; Jurkovich, Gregory; Maier, Ronald V.; Grossman, David C.; MacKenzie, Ellen J.; Moore, Maria; Rivara, Frederick P.

In: Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 285, No. 9, 07.03.2001, p. 1164-1171.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nathens, AB, Jurkovich, G, Maier, RV, Grossman, DC, MacKenzie, EJ, Moore, M & Rivara, FP 2001, 'Relationship between trauma center volume and outcomes', Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 285, no. 9, pp. 1164-1171. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.9.1164
Nathens, Avery B. ; Jurkovich, Gregory ; Maier, Ronald V. ; Grossman, David C. ; MacKenzie, Ellen J. ; Moore, Maria ; Rivara, Frederick P. / Relationship between trauma center volume and outcomes. In: Journal of the American Medical Association. 2001 ; Vol. 285, No. 9. pp. 1164-1171.
@article{decde50ff9b74a9a8d45a3971586cd1e,
title = "Relationship between trauma center volume and outcomes",
abstract = "Context: The premise underlying regionalization of trauma care is that larger volumes of trauma patients cared for in fewer institutions will lead to improved outcomes. However, whether a relationship exists between institutional volume and trauma outcomes remains unknown. Objective: To evaluate the association between trauma center volume and outcomes of trauma patients Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Thirty-one academic level I or level II trauma centers across the United States participating in the University Healthsystem Consortium Trauma Benchmarking Study. Patients: Consecutive patients with penetrating abdominal injury (PAI: n = 478) discharged between November 1, 1997, and Jury 31, 1998, or with multisystem blunt trauma (minimum of head injury and lower-extremity long-bone fractures: n = 541) discharged between June 1 and December 31, 1998. Main Outcome Measures: Inpatient mortality and hospital length of stay (LOS), comparing high-volume (>650 trauma admissions/y) and low-volume (≤650 admissions/y) centers. Results: After multivariate adjustment for patient characteristics and injury severity, the relative odds of death was 0.02 (95{\%} confidence interval [Cl], 0.002-0.25) for patients with PAI admitted with shock to high-volume centers compared with low-volume centers. No benefit was evident in patients without shock (P = .50). The adjusted odds of death in patients with multisystem blunt trauma who presented with coma to a high-volume center was 0.49 (95{\%} Cl, 0.26-0.93) vs low-volume centers. No benefit was observed in patients without coma (P = .05). Additionally, a shorter LOS was observed in patients with PAI and New Injury Severity Scores of 16 or higher (difference in adjusted mean LOS, 1.6 days [95{\%} Cl, -1.5 to 4.7 days]) and in all patients with multisystem blunt trauma admitted to higher-volume centers (difference in adjusted mean LOS, 3.3 days [95{\%} Cl, 0.91-5.70 days]). Conclusions: Our results indicate that a strong association exists between trauma center volume and outcomes, with significant improvements in mortality and LOS when volume exceeds 650 cases per year. These benefits are only evident in patients at high risk for adverse outcomes.",
author = "Nathens, {Avery B.} and Gregory Jurkovich and Maier, {Ronald V.} and Grossman, {David C.} and MacKenzie, {Ellen J.} and Maria Moore and Rivara, {Frederick P.}",
year = "2001",
month = "3",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1001/jama.285.9.1164",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "285",
pages = "1164--1171",
journal = "JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association",
issn = "0002-9955",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relationship between trauma center volume and outcomes

AU - Nathens, Avery B.

AU - Jurkovich, Gregory

AU - Maier, Ronald V.

AU - Grossman, David C.

AU - MacKenzie, Ellen J.

AU - Moore, Maria

AU - Rivara, Frederick P.

PY - 2001/3/7

Y1 - 2001/3/7

N2 - Context: The premise underlying regionalization of trauma care is that larger volumes of trauma patients cared for in fewer institutions will lead to improved outcomes. However, whether a relationship exists between institutional volume and trauma outcomes remains unknown. Objective: To evaluate the association between trauma center volume and outcomes of trauma patients Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Thirty-one academic level I or level II trauma centers across the United States participating in the University Healthsystem Consortium Trauma Benchmarking Study. Patients: Consecutive patients with penetrating abdominal injury (PAI: n = 478) discharged between November 1, 1997, and Jury 31, 1998, or with multisystem blunt trauma (minimum of head injury and lower-extremity long-bone fractures: n = 541) discharged between June 1 and December 31, 1998. Main Outcome Measures: Inpatient mortality and hospital length of stay (LOS), comparing high-volume (>650 trauma admissions/y) and low-volume (≤650 admissions/y) centers. Results: After multivariate adjustment for patient characteristics and injury severity, the relative odds of death was 0.02 (95% confidence interval [Cl], 0.002-0.25) for patients with PAI admitted with shock to high-volume centers compared with low-volume centers. No benefit was evident in patients without shock (P = .50). The adjusted odds of death in patients with multisystem blunt trauma who presented with coma to a high-volume center was 0.49 (95% Cl, 0.26-0.93) vs low-volume centers. No benefit was observed in patients without coma (P = .05). Additionally, a shorter LOS was observed in patients with PAI and New Injury Severity Scores of 16 or higher (difference in adjusted mean LOS, 1.6 days [95% Cl, -1.5 to 4.7 days]) and in all patients with multisystem blunt trauma admitted to higher-volume centers (difference in adjusted mean LOS, 3.3 days [95% Cl, 0.91-5.70 days]). Conclusions: Our results indicate that a strong association exists between trauma center volume and outcomes, with significant improvements in mortality and LOS when volume exceeds 650 cases per year. These benefits are only evident in patients at high risk for adverse outcomes.

AB - Context: The premise underlying regionalization of trauma care is that larger volumes of trauma patients cared for in fewer institutions will lead to improved outcomes. However, whether a relationship exists between institutional volume and trauma outcomes remains unknown. Objective: To evaluate the association between trauma center volume and outcomes of trauma patients Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Thirty-one academic level I or level II trauma centers across the United States participating in the University Healthsystem Consortium Trauma Benchmarking Study. Patients: Consecutive patients with penetrating abdominal injury (PAI: n = 478) discharged between November 1, 1997, and Jury 31, 1998, or with multisystem blunt trauma (minimum of head injury and lower-extremity long-bone fractures: n = 541) discharged between June 1 and December 31, 1998. Main Outcome Measures: Inpatient mortality and hospital length of stay (LOS), comparing high-volume (>650 trauma admissions/y) and low-volume (≤650 admissions/y) centers. Results: After multivariate adjustment for patient characteristics and injury severity, the relative odds of death was 0.02 (95% confidence interval [Cl], 0.002-0.25) for patients with PAI admitted with shock to high-volume centers compared with low-volume centers. No benefit was evident in patients without shock (P = .50). The adjusted odds of death in patients with multisystem blunt trauma who presented with coma to a high-volume center was 0.49 (95% Cl, 0.26-0.93) vs low-volume centers. No benefit was observed in patients without coma (P = .05). Additionally, a shorter LOS was observed in patients with PAI and New Injury Severity Scores of 16 or higher (difference in adjusted mean LOS, 1.6 days [95% Cl, -1.5 to 4.7 days]) and in all patients with multisystem blunt trauma admitted to higher-volume centers (difference in adjusted mean LOS, 3.3 days [95% Cl, 0.91-5.70 days]). Conclusions: Our results indicate that a strong association exists between trauma center volume and outcomes, with significant improvements in mortality and LOS when volume exceeds 650 cases per year. These benefits are only evident in patients at high risk for adverse outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035819918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035819918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jama.285.9.1164

DO - 10.1001/jama.285.9.1164

M3 - Article

C2 - 11231745

AN - SCOPUS:0035819918

VL - 285

SP - 1164

EP - 1171

JO - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

JF - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

SN - 0002-9955

IS - 9

ER -