Regionalization of Care for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Is It Too Soon?

Brent C. Pottenger, Deborah B. Diercks, Deepak L. Bhatt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Interest in regionalization of the care of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has gained momentum recently. Optimal treatment of STEMI involves balancing time to treatment and reperfusion options. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention, when performed in a timely fashion, has been shown to be more effective than fibrinolysis. However, numerous practical barriers prevent many STEMI patients from receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention. In an effort to increase beneficial primary percutaneous coronary intervention administration to STEMI patients, health care leaders have proposed regionalized STEMI care networks with advanced emergency medical services (EMS) involvement. Constructing regionalized STEMI networks presents a policy challenge because this shift in STEMI care would require changes in current EMS and emergency medicine practices. Therefore, we present various perspectives and issues that decisionmakers and system organizers must address properly before deciding whether to adopt this new model of care. Reorganizing STEMI care in a manner analogous to how trauma and stroke care are currently triaged and treated appeals intuitively; however, given the absence of evidence that STEMI regionalization actually improves patient outcomes and is cost-effective, more research is needed to determine whether STEMI regionalization is an efficient model for providing evidence-based care. The concept of STEMI regionalization represents an effort to inform policy according to evidence-based medicine, but real-world quality, geospatial, financial, cost, business, resource, and practice barriers present obstacles to implementing this concept efficiently and effectively.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAnnals of Emergency Medicine
Volume52
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2008

Fingerprint

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Emergency Medical Services
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Costs and Cost Analysis
Emergency Medicine
Evidence-Based Medicine
Fibrinolysis
Reperfusion
Patient Care
Stroke
Delivery of Health Care
Wounds and Injuries
Therapeutics
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Regionalization of Care for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction : Is It Too Soon? / Pottenger, Brent C.; Diercks, Deborah B.; Bhatt, Deepak L.

In: Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 52, No. 6, 12.2008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pottenger, Brent C. ; Diercks, Deborah B. ; Bhatt, Deepak L. / Regionalization of Care for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction : Is It Too Soon?. In: Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 52, No. 6.
@article{822512faaf5043be9ab95f3de00bffd2,
title = "Regionalization of Care for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Is It Too Soon?",
abstract = "Interest in regionalization of the care of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has gained momentum recently. Optimal treatment of STEMI involves balancing time to treatment and reperfusion options. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention, when performed in a timely fashion, has been shown to be more effective than fibrinolysis. However, numerous practical barriers prevent many STEMI patients from receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention. In an effort to increase beneficial primary percutaneous coronary intervention administration to STEMI patients, health care leaders have proposed regionalized STEMI care networks with advanced emergency medical services (EMS) involvement. Constructing regionalized STEMI networks presents a policy challenge because this shift in STEMI care would require changes in current EMS and emergency medicine practices. Therefore, we present various perspectives and issues that decisionmakers and system organizers must address properly before deciding whether to adopt this new model of care. Reorganizing STEMI care in a manner analogous to how trauma and stroke care are currently triaged and treated appeals intuitively; however, given the absence of evidence that STEMI regionalization actually improves patient outcomes and is cost-effective, more research is needed to determine whether STEMI regionalization is an efficient model for providing evidence-based care. The concept of STEMI regionalization represents an effort to inform policy according to evidence-based medicine, but real-world quality, geospatial, financial, cost, business, resource, and practice barriers present obstacles to implementing this concept efficiently and effectively.",
author = "Pottenger, {Brent C.} and Diercks, {Deborah B.} and Bhatt, {Deepak L.}",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.06.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
journal = "Annals of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0196-0644",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regionalization of Care for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

T2 - Is It Too Soon?

AU - Pottenger, Brent C.

AU - Diercks, Deborah B.

AU - Bhatt, Deepak L.

PY - 2008/12

Y1 - 2008/12

N2 - Interest in regionalization of the care of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has gained momentum recently. Optimal treatment of STEMI involves balancing time to treatment and reperfusion options. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention, when performed in a timely fashion, has been shown to be more effective than fibrinolysis. However, numerous practical barriers prevent many STEMI patients from receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention. In an effort to increase beneficial primary percutaneous coronary intervention administration to STEMI patients, health care leaders have proposed regionalized STEMI care networks with advanced emergency medical services (EMS) involvement. Constructing regionalized STEMI networks presents a policy challenge because this shift in STEMI care would require changes in current EMS and emergency medicine practices. Therefore, we present various perspectives and issues that decisionmakers and system organizers must address properly before deciding whether to adopt this new model of care. Reorganizing STEMI care in a manner analogous to how trauma and stroke care are currently triaged and treated appeals intuitively; however, given the absence of evidence that STEMI regionalization actually improves patient outcomes and is cost-effective, more research is needed to determine whether STEMI regionalization is an efficient model for providing evidence-based care. The concept of STEMI regionalization represents an effort to inform policy according to evidence-based medicine, but real-world quality, geospatial, financial, cost, business, resource, and practice barriers present obstacles to implementing this concept efficiently and effectively.

AB - Interest in regionalization of the care of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has gained momentum recently. Optimal treatment of STEMI involves balancing time to treatment and reperfusion options. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention, when performed in a timely fashion, has been shown to be more effective than fibrinolysis. However, numerous practical barriers prevent many STEMI patients from receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention. In an effort to increase beneficial primary percutaneous coronary intervention administration to STEMI patients, health care leaders have proposed regionalized STEMI care networks with advanced emergency medical services (EMS) involvement. Constructing regionalized STEMI networks presents a policy challenge because this shift in STEMI care would require changes in current EMS and emergency medicine practices. Therefore, we present various perspectives and issues that decisionmakers and system organizers must address properly before deciding whether to adopt this new model of care. Reorganizing STEMI care in a manner analogous to how trauma and stroke care are currently triaged and treated appeals intuitively; however, given the absence of evidence that STEMI regionalization actually improves patient outcomes and is cost-effective, more research is needed to determine whether STEMI regionalization is an efficient model for providing evidence-based care. The concept of STEMI regionalization represents an effort to inform policy according to evidence-based medicine, but real-world quality, geospatial, financial, cost, business, resource, and practice barriers present obstacles to implementing this concept efficiently and effectively.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56349160509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56349160509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.06.004

DO - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.06.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 18755524

AN - SCOPUS:56349160509

VL - 52

JO - Annals of Emergency Medicine

JF - Annals of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0196-0644

IS - 6

ER -