Referral for Ophthalmology Evaluation and Visual Sequelae in Children With Primary Brain Tumors

Yin Liu, Chenue Abongwa, Stephen Ashwal, Douglas D. Deming, Timothy W. Winter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Importance: Visual impairment in children with brain tumors has received limited attention, as most pediatric neuro-oncology clinical trials neither require ophthalmologic evaluation on enrollment nor monitor effects of treatment on visual function during and after treatment. Objective: To investigate ophthalmology referral patterns for children with primary brain tumors, the prevalence of visual sequelae, and the association between tumor characteristics and vision-related diagnoses. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included 141 children with primary brain tumors treated at Loma Linda University Children's Hospital and Eye Institute, a university-based tertiary referral center, between January 2013 and September 2017. Data analysis was completed in March 2019. Intervention: Comprehensive ophthalmologic evaluation for children with primary brain tumors. Main Outcomes and Measures: Percentage of patients with ophthalmology evaluation, prevalence of abnormal ophthalmic findings, and their association with tumor characteristics. Results: A total of 141 children (73 [52%] male; median [range] age, 7 [0-18] years) with primary brain tumors were enrolled in this study. Seventy-three patients (41 [52%] male; median [range] age, 8 [0-17] years) never had formal ophthalmologic evaluation. Sixty-eight patients (32 [48%] male; median [range] age, 7 [0-18] years) were evaluated by 1 of 4 board-certified, fellowship-trained pediatric and/or neuro-ophthalmologists for any visual impairment over a total of 222 visits. Five-year overall survival for patients who had eye examination was not significantly different from those who did not (mean [SD] survival, 78.3% [6.2%] vs 84.9% [4.7%]). Median (range) time from tumor diagnosis to initial ophthalmologic evaluation was 9 (0-94) months. Only 10 of 68 children (15%) presented with visual symptoms at tumor diagnosis, while 61 of 68 (90%) had abnormal findings on examination, including strabismus (41 [60%]), visual acuity impairment (37 [54%]), amblyopia (26 [38%]), papilledema (24 [35%]), visual field defects (13 [19%]), optic atrophy (12 [18%]), and keratopathy (10 [15%]). Strabismus occurred more frequently in patients with posterior fossa tumors (26 of 68 in posterior fossa vs 15 of 68 in other locations; P = .02). The presence of visual field defects in patients with no visual symptoms was 15% (9 of 58). Radiation was significantly associated with amblyopia (odds ratio, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.2-15.7; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, more than 50% of children with primary brain tumors were not referred for ophthalmologic evaluation. Although visual symptoms were uncommon, visual impairments occurred more frequently than previously reported. Ophthalmologic evaluation is recommended to identify and manage visual impairment and prevent permanent vision loss in children with brain tumors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e198273
JournalJAMA Network Open
Volume2
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2 2019
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Referral for Ophthalmology Evaluation and Visual Sequelae in Children With Primary Brain Tumors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this