Reevaluation of plain radiographic findings in the diagnosis of aortic rupture: The role of inspiration and positioning on mediastinal width

Fred T. Lee, Richard W Katzberg, Oscar H. Gutierrez, Francis Burgener, Wyman K. Yee, Thomas Morris, James P. Bronson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite the advent of newer imaging modalities, conventional radiography and clinical examination remain the primary screening method in evaluation of the mediastinum following blunt thoracic trauma. Mediastinal witth (MW) is generally considered an important finding in assessing for aortic rupture. The degree of inspiration and patient positioning clearly affects MW, but is largely ignored in the literature. This study investigates the mediastinal widths of normal volunteers with differing degrees of inspiration and positioning, and compares them to radiographs of patients with known aortic ruptures. Mediastinal widths were obtained from chest radiographs of 16 patients with known aortic rupture, and from 50 volunteers using AP-inspiratory-supine, AP-expiratory-supine, and PA-inspiratory-upright technique. Upper 95% confidence limits were obtained for normals. A statistically significant difference in MW of normals was found between inspiratory-supine, expiratory-supine, and upright-inspiratory techniques. Compared to the same degree of inspiration in normals, 12 of 16 patients with aortic rupture had a MW above the upper 95% confidence limits. It is concluded that mediastinal width in normals is significantly affected by the degree of inspiration and positioning. When comparing mediastinal widths for normals and ruptures, there was a significant difference in MW for most degrees of inspiration. As depth of inspiration increased, differences between MW in controls and rupture patients increased. We conclude that patient positioning and degree of inspiration are important factors in assessing the mediastinum, and every effort should thus be made to obtain an upright-inspiratory film if clinically feasible prior to declaring a mediastinum as abnormal.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)289-296
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Emergency Medicine
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Aortic Rupture
Mediastinum
Patient Positioning
Rupture
Thorax
Radiography
Volunteers
Healthy Volunteers
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Aorta injuries
  • Aorta rupture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Reevaluation of plain radiographic findings in the diagnosis of aortic rupture : The role of inspiration and positioning on mediastinal width. / Lee, Fred T.; Katzberg, Richard W; Gutierrez, Oscar H.; Burgener, Francis; Yee, Wyman K.; Morris, Thomas; Bronson, James P.

In: Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 11, No. 3, 1993, p. 289-296.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, Fred T. ; Katzberg, Richard W ; Gutierrez, Oscar H. ; Burgener, Francis ; Yee, Wyman K. ; Morris, Thomas ; Bronson, James P. / Reevaluation of plain radiographic findings in the diagnosis of aortic rupture : The role of inspiration and positioning on mediastinal width. In: Journal of Emergency Medicine. 1993 ; Vol. 11, No. 3. pp. 289-296.
@article{ac3126336af44c31894e2cd98b68887c,
title = "Reevaluation of plain radiographic findings in the diagnosis of aortic rupture: The role of inspiration and positioning on mediastinal width",
abstract = "Despite the advent of newer imaging modalities, conventional radiography and clinical examination remain the primary screening method in evaluation of the mediastinum following blunt thoracic trauma. Mediastinal witth (MW) is generally considered an important finding in assessing for aortic rupture. The degree of inspiration and patient positioning clearly affects MW, but is largely ignored in the literature. This study investigates the mediastinal widths of normal volunteers with differing degrees of inspiration and positioning, and compares them to radiographs of patients with known aortic ruptures. Mediastinal widths were obtained from chest radiographs of 16 patients with known aortic rupture, and from 50 volunteers using AP-inspiratory-supine, AP-expiratory-supine, and PA-inspiratory-upright technique. Upper 95{\%} confidence limits were obtained for normals. A statistically significant difference in MW of normals was found between inspiratory-supine, expiratory-supine, and upright-inspiratory techniques. Compared to the same degree of inspiration in normals, 12 of 16 patients with aortic rupture had a MW above the upper 95{\%} confidence limits. It is concluded that mediastinal width in normals is significantly affected by the degree of inspiration and positioning. When comparing mediastinal widths for normals and ruptures, there was a significant difference in MW for most degrees of inspiration. As depth of inspiration increased, differences between MW in controls and rupture patients increased. We conclude that patient positioning and degree of inspiration are important factors in assessing the mediastinum, and every effort should thus be made to obtain an upright-inspiratory film if clinically feasible prior to declaring a mediastinum as abnormal.",
keywords = "Aorta injuries, Aorta rupture",
author = "Lee, {Fred T.} and Katzberg, {Richard W} and Gutierrez, {Oscar H.} and Francis Burgener and Yee, {Wyman K.} and Thomas Morris and Bronson, {James P.}",
year = "1993",
doi = "10.1016/0736-4679(93)90049-D",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "289--296",
journal = "Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0736-4679",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reevaluation of plain radiographic findings in the diagnosis of aortic rupture

T2 - The role of inspiration and positioning on mediastinal width

AU - Lee, Fred T.

AU - Katzberg, Richard W

AU - Gutierrez, Oscar H.

AU - Burgener, Francis

AU - Yee, Wyman K.

AU - Morris, Thomas

AU - Bronson, James P.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Despite the advent of newer imaging modalities, conventional radiography and clinical examination remain the primary screening method in evaluation of the mediastinum following blunt thoracic trauma. Mediastinal witth (MW) is generally considered an important finding in assessing for aortic rupture. The degree of inspiration and patient positioning clearly affects MW, but is largely ignored in the literature. This study investigates the mediastinal widths of normal volunteers with differing degrees of inspiration and positioning, and compares them to radiographs of patients with known aortic ruptures. Mediastinal widths were obtained from chest radiographs of 16 patients with known aortic rupture, and from 50 volunteers using AP-inspiratory-supine, AP-expiratory-supine, and PA-inspiratory-upright technique. Upper 95% confidence limits were obtained for normals. A statistically significant difference in MW of normals was found between inspiratory-supine, expiratory-supine, and upright-inspiratory techniques. Compared to the same degree of inspiration in normals, 12 of 16 patients with aortic rupture had a MW above the upper 95% confidence limits. It is concluded that mediastinal width in normals is significantly affected by the degree of inspiration and positioning. When comparing mediastinal widths for normals and ruptures, there was a significant difference in MW for most degrees of inspiration. As depth of inspiration increased, differences between MW in controls and rupture patients increased. We conclude that patient positioning and degree of inspiration are important factors in assessing the mediastinum, and every effort should thus be made to obtain an upright-inspiratory film if clinically feasible prior to declaring a mediastinum as abnormal.

AB - Despite the advent of newer imaging modalities, conventional radiography and clinical examination remain the primary screening method in evaluation of the mediastinum following blunt thoracic trauma. Mediastinal witth (MW) is generally considered an important finding in assessing for aortic rupture. The degree of inspiration and patient positioning clearly affects MW, but is largely ignored in the literature. This study investigates the mediastinal widths of normal volunteers with differing degrees of inspiration and positioning, and compares them to radiographs of patients with known aortic ruptures. Mediastinal widths were obtained from chest radiographs of 16 patients with known aortic rupture, and from 50 volunteers using AP-inspiratory-supine, AP-expiratory-supine, and PA-inspiratory-upright technique. Upper 95% confidence limits were obtained for normals. A statistically significant difference in MW of normals was found between inspiratory-supine, expiratory-supine, and upright-inspiratory techniques. Compared to the same degree of inspiration in normals, 12 of 16 patients with aortic rupture had a MW above the upper 95% confidence limits. It is concluded that mediastinal width in normals is significantly affected by the degree of inspiration and positioning. When comparing mediastinal widths for normals and ruptures, there was a significant difference in MW for most degrees of inspiration. As depth of inspiration increased, differences between MW in controls and rupture patients increased. We conclude that patient positioning and degree of inspiration are important factors in assessing the mediastinum, and every effort should thus be made to obtain an upright-inspiratory film if clinically feasible prior to declaring a mediastinum as abnormal.

KW - Aorta injuries

KW - Aorta rupture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027253633&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027253633&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0736-4679(93)90049-D

DO - 10.1016/0736-4679(93)90049-D

M3 - Article

C2 - 8340585

AN - SCOPUS:0027253633

VL - 11

SP - 289

EP - 296

JO - Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0736-4679

IS - 3

ER -