Reducing Urban Violence: A Contrast of Public Health and Criminal Justice Approaches

Magdalena Cerda, Melissa Tracy, Katherine M. Keyes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Cities are investing millions in Cure Violence, a public health approach to reduce urban violence by targeting at-risk youth and redirecting conflict to nonviolent responses. The impact of such a program compared with criminal justice responses is unknown because experiments directly comparing criminal justice and public health approaches to violence prevention are infeasible with observational data. We simulated experiments to test the influence of two interventions on violence: (1) Cure Violence and (2) directed police patrol in violence hot spots. Methods: We used an agent-based model to simulate a 5% sample of the New York City (NYC) adult population, with agents placed on a grid representing the land area of NYC, with neighborhood size and population density proportional to land area and population density in each community district. Agent behaviors were governed by parameters drawn from city data sources and published estimates. Results: Under no intervention, 3.87% (95% CI, 3.84, 3.90) of agents were victimized per year. Implementing the violence interrupter intervention for 10 years decreased victimization by 13% (to 3.35% [3.32, 3.39]). Implementing hot-spots policing and doubling the police force for 10 years reduced annual victimization by about 11% (to 3.46% [3.42, 3.49]). Increasing the police force by 40% combined with implementing the violence interrupter intervention for 10 years decreased violence by 19% (to 3.13% [3.09, 3.16]). Conclusions: Combined investment in a public health, community-based approach to violence prevention and a criminal justice approach focused on deterrence can achieve more to reduce population-level rates of urban violence than either can in isolation. See video abstract at, http://links.lww.com/EDE/B298.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)142-150
Number of pages9
JournalEpidemiology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Criminal Law
Violence
Public Health
Police
Crime Victims
Population Density
Information Storage and Retrieval
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Reducing Urban Violence : A Contrast of Public Health and Criminal Justice Approaches. / Cerda, Magdalena; Tracy, Melissa; Keyes, Katherine M.

In: Epidemiology, 01.01.2018, p. 142-150.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d632d4e16664465b9b89943d0e204dc6,
title = "Reducing Urban Violence: A Contrast of Public Health and Criminal Justice Approaches",
abstract = "Background: Cities are investing millions in Cure Violence, a public health approach to reduce urban violence by targeting at-risk youth and redirecting conflict to nonviolent responses. The impact of such a program compared with criminal justice responses is unknown because experiments directly comparing criminal justice and public health approaches to violence prevention are infeasible with observational data. We simulated experiments to test the influence of two interventions on violence: (1) Cure Violence and (2) directed police patrol in violence hot spots. Methods: We used an agent-based model to simulate a 5{\%} sample of the New York City (NYC) adult population, with agents placed on a grid representing the land area of NYC, with neighborhood size and population density proportional to land area and population density in each community district. Agent behaviors were governed by parameters drawn from city data sources and published estimates. Results: Under no intervention, 3.87{\%} (95{\%} CI, 3.84, 3.90) of agents were victimized per year. Implementing the violence interrupter intervention for 10 years decreased victimization by 13{\%} (to 3.35{\%} [3.32, 3.39]). Implementing hot-spots policing and doubling the police force for 10 years reduced annual victimization by about 11{\%} (to 3.46{\%} [3.42, 3.49]). Increasing the police force by 40{\%} combined with implementing the violence interrupter intervention for 10 years decreased violence by 19{\%} (to 3.13{\%} [3.09, 3.16]). Conclusions: Combined investment in a public health, community-based approach to violence prevention and a criminal justice approach focused on deterrence can achieve more to reduce population-level rates of urban violence than either can in isolation. See video abstract at, http://links.lww.com/EDE/B298.",
author = "Magdalena Cerda and Melissa Tracy and Keyes, {Katherine M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/EDE.0000000000000756",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "142--150",
journal = "Epidemiology",
issn = "1044-3983",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reducing Urban Violence

T2 - A Contrast of Public Health and Criminal Justice Approaches

AU - Cerda, Magdalena

AU - Tracy, Melissa

AU - Keyes, Katherine M.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background: Cities are investing millions in Cure Violence, a public health approach to reduce urban violence by targeting at-risk youth and redirecting conflict to nonviolent responses. The impact of such a program compared with criminal justice responses is unknown because experiments directly comparing criminal justice and public health approaches to violence prevention are infeasible with observational data. We simulated experiments to test the influence of two interventions on violence: (1) Cure Violence and (2) directed police patrol in violence hot spots. Methods: We used an agent-based model to simulate a 5% sample of the New York City (NYC) adult population, with agents placed on a grid representing the land area of NYC, with neighborhood size and population density proportional to land area and population density in each community district. Agent behaviors were governed by parameters drawn from city data sources and published estimates. Results: Under no intervention, 3.87% (95% CI, 3.84, 3.90) of agents were victimized per year. Implementing the violence interrupter intervention for 10 years decreased victimization by 13% (to 3.35% [3.32, 3.39]). Implementing hot-spots policing and doubling the police force for 10 years reduced annual victimization by about 11% (to 3.46% [3.42, 3.49]). Increasing the police force by 40% combined with implementing the violence interrupter intervention for 10 years decreased violence by 19% (to 3.13% [3.09, 3.16]). Conclusions: Combined investment in a public health, community-based approach to violence prevention and a criminal justice approach focused on deterrence can achieve more to reduce population-level rates of urban violence than either can in isolation. See video abstract at, http://links.lww.com/EDE/B298.

AB - Background: Cities are investing millions in Cure Violence, a public health approach to reduce urban violence by targeting at-risk youth and redirecting conflict to nonviolent responses. The impact of such a program compared with criminal justice responses is unknown because experiments directly comparing criminal justice and public health approaches to violence prevention are infeasible with observational data. We simulated experiments to test the influence of two interventions on violence: (1) Cure Violence and (2) directed police patrol in violence hot spots. Methods: We used an agent-based model to simulate a 5% sample of the New York City (NYC) adult population, with agents placed on a grid representing the land area of NYC, with neighborhood size and population density proportional to land area and population density in each community district. Agent behaviors were governed by parameters drawn from city data sources and published estimates. Results: Under no intervention, 3.87% (95% CI, 3.84, 3.90) of agents were victimized per year. Implementing the violence interrupter intervention for 10 years decreased victimization by 13% (to 3.35% [3.32, 3.39]). Implementing hot-spots policing and doubling the police force for 10 years reduced annual victimization by about 11% (to 3.46% [3.42, 3.49]). Increasing the police force by 40% combined with implementing the violence interrupter intervention for 10 years decreased violence by 19% (to 3.13% [3.09, 3.16]). Conclusions: Combined investment in a public health, community-based approach to violence prevention and a criminal justice approach focused on deterrence can achieve more to reduce population-level rates of urban violence than either can in isolation. See video abstract at, http://links.lww.com/EDE/B298.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044287830&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044287830&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000756

DO - 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000756

M3 - Article

C2 - 28926374

AN - SCOPUS:85044287830

SP - 142

EP - 150

JO - Epidemiology

JF - Epidemiology

SN - 1044-3983

ER -