Reducing obesity prejudice in medical education

Kabir Matharu, Johanna F. Shapiro, Rachel R. Hammer, Richard L Kravitz, Machelle D. Wilson, Faith T Fitzgerald

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

RESULTS: At baseline, students demonstrated moderate explicit and implicit bias toward obese people despite high scores on empathy. Students randomized to the play-reading group had significantly decreased explicit fat bias (P = 0.01) at follow-up, while students in the lecture group showed increased endorsement of a prescriptive model of care at the expense of a patient-centered approach (P = 0.03). There was a significant increase in empathy for those in both the theater (P = 0.007) and lecture group (P = 0.02). The intervention had no significant effect on implicit bias or regard for obesity as a civil rights issue.

DISCUSSION: Dramatic reading may be superior to traditional medical lectures for showcasing patient rights and preferences. The present study demonstrates for the first time that play-reading diminishes conscious obesity bias. Further research should determine whether nontraditional methods of instruction promote improved understanding of and care for obese patients.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare worker attitudes toward obese individuals facilitate discrimination and contribute to poor health outcomes. Previous studies have demonstrated medical student bias toward obese individuals, but few have examined effects of the educational environment on these prejudicial beliefs. We sought to determine whether an innovative educational intervention (reading a play about obesity) could diminish obesity prejudice relative to a standard medical lecture.

METHODS: We conducted a randomized, controlled trial enrolling medical students (n = 129) from three universities. Students were assigned to play-reading or a standard lecture. Explicit attitudes and implicit bias toward obese individuals were assessed prior to intervention and after four months.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)231-237
Number of pages7
JournalEducation for Health: Change in Learning and Practice
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2014

Fingerprint

Medical Education
prejudice
Reading
Obesity
Students
trend
education
Medical Students
empathy
medical student
student
Civil Rights
Patient Preference
Patient Rights
patient's rights
Group
civil rights
Patient Care
Randomized Controlled Trials
theater

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Reducing obesity prejudice in medical education. / Matharu, Kabir; Shapiro, Johanna F.; Hammer, Rachel R.; Kravitz, Richard L; Wilson, Machelle D.; Fitzgerald, Faith T.

In: Education for Health: Change in Learning and Practice, Vol. 27, No. 3, 01.09.2014, p. 231-237.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Matharu, Kabir ; Shapiro, Johanna F. ; Hammer, Rachel R. ; Kravitz, Richard L ; Wilson, Machelle D. ; Fitzgerald, Faith T. / Reducing obesity prejudice in medical education. In: Education for Health: Change in Learning and Practice. 2014 ; Vol. 27, No. 3. pp. 231-237.
@article{059776958ba74d2ba00ee58e827844d8,
title = "Reducing obesity prejudice in medical education",
abstract = "RESULTS: At baseline, students demonstrated moderate explicit and implicit bias toward obese people despite high scores on empathy. Students randomized to the play-reading group had significantly decreased explicit fat bias (P = 0.01) at follow-up, while students in the lecture group showed increased endorsement of a prescriptive model of care at the expense of a patient-centered approach (P = 0.03). There was a significant increase in empathy for those in both the theater (P = 0.007) and lecture group (P = 0.02). The intervention had no significant effect on implicit bias or regard for obesity as a civil rights issue.DISCUSSION: Dramatic reading may be superior to traditional medical lectures for showcasing patient rights and preferences. The present study demonstrates for the first time that play-reading diminishes conscious obesity bias. Further research should determine whether nontraditional methods of instruction promote improved understanding of and care for obese patients.BACKGROUND: Healthcare worker attitudes toward obese individuals facilitate discrimination and contribute to poor health outcomes. Previous studies have demonstrated medical student bias toward obese individuals, but few have examined effects of the educational environment on these prejudicial beliefs. We sought to determine whether an innovative educational intervention (reading a play about obesity) could diminish obesity prejudice relative to a standard medical lecture.METHODS: We conducted a randomized, controlled trial enrolling medical students (n = 129) from three universities. Students were assigned to play-reading or a standard lecture. Explicit attitudes and implicit bias toward obese individuals were assessed prior to intervention and after four months.",
author = "Kabir Matharu and Shapiro, {Johanna F.} and Hammer, {Rachel R.} and Kravitz, {Richard L} and Wilson, {Machelle D.} and Fitzgerald, {Faith T}",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/1357-6283.152176",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "231--237",
journal = "Education for Health",
issn = "1357-6283",
publisher = "Network: Towards Unity for Health",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reducing obesity prejudice in medical education

AU - Matharu, Kabir

AU - Shapiro, Johanna F.

AU - Hammer, Rachel R.

AU - Kravitz, Richard L

AU - Wilson, Machelle D.

AU - Fitzgerald, Faith T

PY - 2014/9/1

Y1 - 2014/9/1

N2 - RESULTS: At baseline, students demonstrated moderate explicit and implicit bias toward obese people despite high scores on empathy. Students randomized to the play-reading group had significantly decreased explicit fat bias (P = 0.01) at follow-up, while students in the lecture group showed increased endorsement of a prescriptive model of care at the expense of a patient-centered approach (P = 0.03). There was a significant increase in empathy for those in both the theater (P = 0.007) and lecture group (P = 0.02). The intervention had no significant effect on implicit bias or regard for obesity as a civil rights issue.DISCUSSION: Dramatic reading may be superior to traditional medical lectures for showcasing patient rights and preferences. The present study demonstrates for the first time that play-reading diminishes conscious obesity bias. Further research should determine whether nontraditional methods of instruction promote improved understanding of and care for obese patients.BACKGROUND: Healthcare worker attitudes toward obese individuals facilitate discrimination and contribute to poor health outcomes. Previous studies have demonstrated medical student bias toward obese individuals, but few have examined effects of the educational environment on these prejudicial beliefs. We sought to determine whether an innovative educational intervention (reading a play about obesity) could diminish obesity prejudice relative to a standard medical lecture.METHODS: We conducted a randomized, controlled trial enrolling medical students (n = 129) from three universities. Students were assigned to play-reading or a standard lecture. Explicit attitudes and implicit bias toward obese individuals were assessed prior to intervention and after four months.

AB - RESULTS: At baseline, students demonstrated moderate explicit and implicit bias toward obese people despite high scores on empathy. Students randomized to the play-reading group had significantly decreased explicit fat bias (P = 0.01) at follow-up, while students in the lecture group showed increased endorsement of a prescriptive model of care at the expense of a patient-centered approach (P = 0.03). There was a significant increase in empathy for those in both the theater (P = 0.007) and lecture group (P = 0.02). The intervention had no significant effect on implicit bias or regard for obesity as a civil rights issue.DISCUSSION: Dramatic reading may be superior to traditional medical lectures for showcasing patient rights and preferences. The present study demonstrates for the first time that play-reading diminishes conscious obesity bias. Further research should determine whether nontraditional methods of instruction promote improved understanding of and care for obese patients.BACKGROUND: Healthcare worker attitudes toward obese individuals facilitate discrimination and contribute to poor health outcomes. Previous studies have demonstrated medical student bias toward obese individuals, but few have examined effects of the educational environment on these prejudicial beliefs. We sought to determine whether an innovative educational intervention (reading a play about obesity) could diminish obesity prejudice relative to a standard medical lecture.METHODS: We conducted a randomized, controlled trial enrolling medical students (n = 129) from three universities. Students were assigned to play-reading or a standard lecture. Explicit attitudes and implicit bias toward obese individuals were assessed prior to intervention and after four months.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946406276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84946406276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/1357-6283.152176

DO - 10.4103/1357-6283.152176

M3 - Article

C2 - 25758385

AN - SCOPUS:84923656452

VL - 27

SP - 231

EP - 237

JO - Education for Health

JF - Education for Health

SN - 1357-6283

IS - 3

ER -