RECOVER evidence and knowledge gap analysis on veterinary CPR. Part 3: Basic life support

Katrina Hopper, Steven E Epstein, Daniel J. Fletcher, Manuel Boller, T. C. Duffy, J. C. Hess, G. L. Hoareau, R. L. Irizarry, M. S. Mellema, R. K. Nakamura, D. W. Purvis, D. M. Schropp, M. B. Seekins, C. R. Sharp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To systematically examine the evidence on basic life support (BLS) in veterinary CPR and to determine knowledge gaps. Design: Standardized, systematic evaluation of the literature, categorization of relevant articles according to level of evidence and quality, and development of consensus on conclusions for application of the concepts to clinical practice. Relevant questions were answered on a worksheet template and reviewed by the Reassessment Campaign on Veterinary Resuscitation (RECOVER) BLS domain members, by the RECOVER committee and opened for comments by veterinary professionals for 30 days. Setting: Academia, referral practice, and general practice. Results: Sixteen worksheets were prepared to evaluate techniques for chest compression and ventilation strategies as well as identification of cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA). Major recommendations arising from this evidence review include performing chest compressions at a rate of at least 100/min at a compression depth of one-third to half the width of the chest with minimal pauses, and early instigation of ventilation at a rate of 8-10 breaths/min in intubated patients, or using a 30:2 compression/ventilation ratio in nonintubated patients. Conclusions: Although veterinary clinical trials are lacking, much of the experimental literature on BLS utilized canine models. The major conclusions from this analysis of the literature are the importance of early identification of CPA, and immediate initiation of BLS in these patients. Many knowledge gaps exist, most importantly in our understanding of the optimal hand placement and technique for chest compressions, warranting coordinated future studies targeted at questions of relevance to differences between veterinary species and humans.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care
Volume22
Issue numberSUPPL.1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2012

Fingerprint

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
chest
Resuscitation
Thorax
Ventilation
cardiac arrest
Heart Arrest
General Practice
committees
Canidae
clinical trials
Consensus
hands
Referral and Consultation
Hand
Clinical Trials
dogs
methodology

Keywords

  • Cardiac arrest
  • CPR
  • Evidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

RECOVER evidence and knowledge gap analysis on veterinary CPR. Part 3 : Basic life support. / Hopper, Katrina; Epstein, Steven E; Fletcher, Daniel J.; Boller, Manuel; Duffy, T. C.; Hess, J. C.; Hoareau, G. L.; Irizarry, R. L.; Mellema, M. S.; Nakamura, R. K.; Purvis, D. W.; Schropp, D. M.; Seekins, M. B.; Sharp, C. R.

In: Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care, Vol. 22, No. SUPPL.1, 06.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hopper, K, Epstein, SE, Fletcher, DJ, Boller, M, Duffy, TC, Hess, JC, Hoareau, GL, Irizarry, RL, Mellema, MS, Nakamura, RK, Purvis, DW, Schropp, DM, Seekins, MB & Sharp, CR 2012, 'RECOVER evidence and knowledge gap analysis on veterinary CPR. Part 3: Basic life support', Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care, vol. 22, no. SUPPL.1. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-4431.2012.00753.x
Hopper, Katrina ; Epstein, Steven E ; Fletcher, Daniel J. ; Boller, Manuel ; Duffy, T. C. ; Hess, J. C. ; Hoareau, G. L. ; Irizarry, R. L. ; Mellema, M. S. ; Nakamura, R. K. ; Purvis, D. W. ; Schropp, D. M. ; Seekins, M. B. ; Sharp, C. R. / RECOVER evidence and knowledge gap analysis on veterinary CPR. Part 3 : Basic life support. In: Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care. 2012 ; Vol. 22, No. SUPPL.1.
@article{57599e64fba444328e3797ef806325eb,
title = "RECOVER evidence and knowledge gap analysis on veterinary CPR. Part 3: Basic life support",
abstract = "Objective: To systematically examine the evidence on basic life support (BLS) in veterinary CPR and to determine knowledge gaps. Design: Standardized, systematic evaluation of the literature, categorization of relevant articles according to level of evidence and quality, and development of consensus on conclusions for application of the concepts to clinical practice. Relevant questions were answered on a worksheet template and reviewed by the Reassessment Campaign on Veterinary Resuscitation (RECOVER) BLS domain members, by the RECOVER committee and opened for comments by veterinary professionals for 30 days. Setting: Academia, referral practice, and general practice. Results: Sixteen worksheets were prepared to evaluate techniques for chest compression and ventilation strategies as well as identification of cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA). Major recommendations arising from this evidence review include performing chest compressions at a rate of at least 100/min at a compression depth of one-third to half the width of the chest with minimal pauses, and early instigation of ventilation at a rate of 8-10 breaths/min in intubated patients, or using a 30:2 compression/ventilation ratio in nonintubated patients. Conclusions: Although veterinary clinical trials are lacking, much of the experimental literature on BLS utilized canine models. The major conclusions from this analysis of the literature are the importance of early identification of CPA, and immediate initiation of BLS in these patients. Many knowledge gaps exist, most importantly in our understanding of the optimal hand placement and technique for chest compressions, warranting coordinated future studies targeted at questions of relevance to differences between veterinary species and humans.",
keywords = "Cardiac arrest, CPR, Evidence",
author = "Katrina Hopper and Epstein, {Steven E} and Fletcher, {Daniel J.} and Manuel Boller and Duffy, {T. C.} and Hess, {J. C.} and Hoareau, {G. L.} and Irizarry, {R. L.} and Mellema, {M. S.} and Nakamura, {R. K.} and Purvis, {D. W.} and Schropp, {D. M.} and Seekins, {M. B.} and Sharp, {C. R.}",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/j.1476-4431.2012.00753.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
journal = "Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care",
issn = "1479-3261",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "SUPPL.1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - RECOVER evidence and knowledge gap analysis on veterinary CPR. Part 3

T2 - Basic life support

AU - Hopper, Katrina

AU - Epstein, Steven E

AU - Fletcher, Daniel J.

AU - Boller, Manuel

AU - Duffy, T. C.

AU - Hess, J. C.

AU - Hoareau, G. L.

AU - Irizarry, R. L.

AU - Mellema, M. S.

AU - Nakamura, R. K.

AU - Purvis, D. W.

AU - Schropp, D. M.

AU - Seekins, M. B.

AU - Sharp, C. R.

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - Objective: To systematically examine the evidence on basic life support (BLS) in veterinary CPR and to determine knowledge gaps. Design: Standardized, systematic evaluation of the literature, categorization of relevant articles according to level of evidence and quality, and development of consensus on conclusions for application of the concepts to clinical practice. Relevant questions were answered on a worksheet template and reviewed by the Reassessment Campaign on Veterinary Resuscitation (RECOVER) BLS domain members, by the RECOVER committee and opened for comments by veterinary professionals for 30 days. Setting: Academia, referral practice, and general practice. Results: Sixteen worksheets were prepared to evaluate techniques for chest compression and ventilation strategies as well as identification of cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA). Major recommendations arising from this evidence review include performing chest compressions at a rate of at least 100/min at a compression depth of one-third to half the width of the chest with minimal pauses, and early instigation of ventilation at a rate of 8-10 breaths/min in intubated patients, or using a 30:2 compression/ventilation ratio in nonintubated patients. Conclusions: Although veterinary clinical trials are lacking, much of the experimental literature on BLS utilized canine models. The major conclusions from this analysis of the literature are the importance of early identification of CPA, and immediate initiation of BLS in these patients. Many knowledge gaps exist, most importantly in our understanding of the optimal hand placement and technique for chest compressions, warranting coordinated future studies targeted at questions of relevance to differences between veterinary species and humans.

AB - Objective: To systematically examine the evidence on basic life support (BLS) in veterinary CPR and to determine knowledge gaps. Design: Standardized, systematic evaluation of the literature, categorization of relevant articles according to level of evidence and quality, and development of consensus on conclusions for application of the concepts to clinical practice. Relevant questions were answered on a worksheet template and reviewed by the Reassessment Campaign on Veterinary Resuscitation (RECOVER) BLS domain members, by the RECOVER committee and opened for comments by veterinary professionals for 30 days. Setting: Academia, referral practice, and general practice. Results: Sixteen worksheets were prepared to evaluate techniques for chest compression and ventilation strategies as well as identification of cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA). Major recommendations arising from this evidence review include performing chest compressions at a rate of at least 100/min at a compression depth of one-third to half the width of the chest with minimal pauses, and early instigation of ventilation at a rate of 8-10 breaths/min in intubated patients, or using a 30:2 compression/ventilation ratio in nonintubated patients. Conclusions: Although veterinary clinical trials are lacking, much of the experimental literature on BLS utilized canine models. The major conclusions from this analysis of the literature are the importance of early identification of CPA, and immediate initiation of BLS in these patients. Many knowledge gaps exist, most importantly in our understanding of the optimal hand placement and technique for chest compressions, warranting coordinated future studies targeted at questions of relevance to differences between veterinary species and humans.

KW - Cardiac arrest

KW - CPR

KW - Evidence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862138595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862138595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1476-4431.2012.00753.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1476-4431.2012.00753.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 22676283

AN - SCOPUS:84862138595

VL - 22

JO - Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care

JF - Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care

SN - 1479-3261

IS - SUPPL.1

ER -