TY - JOUR
T1 - Recognition of RNA by the S9.6 antibody creates pervasive artifacts when imaging RNA:DNA hybrids
AU - Smolka, John A.
AU - Sanz, Lionel A.
AU - Hartono, Stella R.
AU - Chédin, Frédéric
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Smolka et al.
PY - 2021/6/7
Y1 - 2021/6/7
N2 - The S9.6 antibody is broadly used to detect RNA:DNA hybrids but has significant affinity for double-stranded RNA. The impact of this off-target RNA binding activity has not been thoroughly investigated, especially in the context of immunofluorescence microscopy. We report that S9.6 immunofluorescence signal observed in fixed human cells arises predominantly from ribosomal RNA, not RNA:DNA hybrids. S9.6 staining was unchanged by pretreatment with the RNA:DNA hybrid-specific nuclease RNase H1, despite verification in situ that S9.6 recognized RNA:DNA hybrids and that RNase H1 was active. S9.6 staining was, however, significantly sensitive to RNase T1, which specifically degrades RNA. Additional imaging and biochemical data indicate that the prominent cytoplasmic and nucleolar S9.6 signal primarily derives from ribosomal RNA. Importantly, genome-wide maps obtained by DNA sequencing after S9.6-mediated DNA:RNA immunoprecipitation (DRIP) are RNase H1 sensitive and RNase T1 insensitive. Altogether, these data demonstrate that imaging using S9.6 is subject to pervasive artifacts without pretreatments and controls that mitigate its promiscuous recognition of cellular RNAs.
AB - The S9.6 antibody is broadly used to detect RNA:DNA hybrids but has significant affinity for double-stranded RNA. The impact of this off-target RNA binding activity has not been thoroughly investigated, especially in the context of immunofluorescence microscopy. We report that S9.6 immunofluorescence signal observed in fixed human cells arises predominantly from ribosomal RNA, not RNA:DNA hybrids. S9.6 staining was unchanged by pretreatment with the RNA:DNA hybrid-specific nuclease RNase H1, despite verification in situ that S9.6 recognized RNA:DNA hybrids and that RNase H1 was active. S9.6 staining was, however, significantly sensitive to RNase T1, which specifically degrades RNA. Additional imaging and biochemical data indicate that the prominent cytoplasmic and nucleolar S9.6 signal primarily derives from ribosomal RNA. Importantly, genome-wide maps obtained by DNA sequencing after S9.6-mediated DNA:RNA immunoprecipitation (DRIP) are RNase H1 sensitive and RNase T1 insensitive. Altogether, these data demonstrate that imaging using S9.6 is subject to pervasive artifacts without pretreatments and controls that mitigate its promiscuous recognition of cellular RNAs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104097444&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85104097444&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1083/jcb.202004079
DO - 10.1083/jcb.202004079
M3 - Article
C2 - 33830170
AN - SCOPUS:85104097444
VL - 220
JO - Journal of Cell Biology
JF - Journal of Cell Biology
SN - 0021-9525
IS - 6
ER -