Radiation exposure of dogs and cats undergoing fluoroscopic procedures and for operators performing those procedures

Rebecca A. Hersh-Boyle, William T Culp, Dorothy C. Brown, Austin C. Luskin, Amy Kapatkin, Po-Yen Chou, Kimberly A. Agnello, Jennifer A. Reetz, Mark A. Oyama, Lance C. Visser, Carrie Palm, Dana L. Clarke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate radiation exposure of dogs and cats undergoing procedures requiring intraoperative fluoroscopy and for operators performing those procedures. SAMPLE: 360 fluoroscopic procedures performed at 2 academic institutions between 2012 and 2015. PROCEDURES: Fluoroscopic procedures were classified as vascular, urinary, respiratory, cardiac, gastrointestinal, and orthopedic. Fluoroscopy operators were classified as interventional radiology-trained clinicians, orthopedic surgeons, soft tissue surgeons, internists, and cardiologists. Total radiation exposure in milligrays and total fluoroscopy time in minutes were obtained from dose reports for 4 C-arm units. Kruskal-Wallis equality of populations rank tests and Dunn pairwise comparisons were used to compare differences in time and exposure among procedures and operators. RESULTS: Fluoroscopy time (median, 35.80 minutes; range, 0.60 to 84.70 minutes) was significantly greater and radiation exposure (median, 137.00 mGy; range, 3.00 to 617.51 mGy) was significantly higher for vascular procedures than for other procedures. Median total radiation exposure was significantly higher for procedures performed by interventional radiology-trained clinicians (16.10 mGy; range, 0.44 to 617.50 mGy), cardiologists (25.82 mGy; range, 0.33 to 287.45 mGy), and internists (25.24 mGy; range, 3.58 to 185.79 mGy). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Vascular fluoroscopic procedures were associated with significantly longer fluoroscopy time and higher radiation exposure than were other evaluated fluoroscopic procedures. Future studies should focus on quantitative radiation monitoring for patients and operators, importance of operator training, intraoperative safety measures, and protocols for postoperative monitoring of patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)558-564
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican journal of veterinary research
Volume80
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

Fingerprint

blood vessels
Cats
radiology
orthopedics
surgeons
Dogs
cats
dogs
Fluoroscopy
educational institutions
monitoring
Blood Vessels
Interventional Radiology
dosage
Radiation Monitoring
Radiation Exposure
testing
Physiologic Monitoring
Orthopedics
Safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Radiation exposure of dogs and cats undergoing fluoroscopic procedures and for operators performing those procedures. / Hersh-Boyle, Rebecca A.; Culp, William T; Brown, Dorothy C.; Luskin, Austin C.; Kapatkin, Amy; Chou, Po-Yen; Agnello, Kimberly A.; Reetz, Jennifer A.; Oyama, Mark A.; Visser, Lance C.; Palm, Carrie; Clarke, Dana L.

In: American journal of veterinary research, Vol. 80, No. 6, 01.06.2019, p. 558-564.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hersh-Boyle, RA, Culp, WT, Brown, DC, Luskin, AC, Kapatkin, A, Chou, P-Y, Agnello, KA, Reetz, JA, Oyama, MA, Visser, LC, Palm, C & Clarke, DL 2019, 'Radiation exposure of dogs and cats undergoing fluoroscopic procedures and for operators performing those procedures', American journal of veterinary research, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 558-564. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.80.6.558
Hersh-Boyle, Rebecca A. ; Culp, William T ; Brown, Dorothy C. ; Luskin, Austin C. ; Kapatkin, Amy ; Chou, Po-Yen ; Agnello, Kimberly A. ; Reetz, Jennifer A. ; Oyama, Mark A. ; Visser, Lance C. ; Palm, Carrie ; Clarke, Dana L. / Radiation exposure of dogs and cats undergoing fluoroscopic procedures and for operators performing those procedures. In: American journal of veterinary research. 2019 ; Vol. 80, No. 6. pp. 558-564.
@article{900f211b7ea6402d84ff72c86254d1f9,
title = "Radiation exposure of dogs and cats undergoing fluoroscopic procedures and for operators performing those procedures",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To evaluate radiation exposure of dogs and cats undergoing procedures requiring intraoperative fluoroscopy and for operators performing those procedures. SAMPLE: 360 fluoroscopic procedures performed at 2 academic institutions between 2012 and 2015. PROCEDURES: Fluoroscopic procedures were classified as vascular, urinary, respiratory, cardiac, gastrointestinal, and orthopedic. Fluoroscopy operators were classified as interventional radiology-trained clinicians, orthopedic surgeons, soft tissue surgeons, internists, and cardiologists. Total radiation exposure in milligrays and total fluoroscopy time in minutes were obtained from dose reports for 4 C-arm units. Kruskal-Wallis equality of populations rank tests and Dunn pairwise comparisons were used to compare differences in time and exposure among procedures and operators. RESULTS: Fluoroscopy time (median, 35.80 minutes; range, 0.60 to 84.70 minutes) was significantly greater and radiation exposure (median, 137.00 mGy; range, 3.00 to 617.51 mGy) was significantly higher for vascular procedures than for other procedures. Median total radiation exposure was significantly higher for procedures performed by interventional radiology-trained clinicians (16.10 mGy; range, 0.44 to 617.50 mGy), cardiologists (25.82 mGy; range, 0.33 to 287.45 mGy), and internists (25.24 mGy; range, 3.58 to 185.79 mGy). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Vascular fluoroscopic procedures were associated with significantly longer fluoroscopy time and higher radiation exposure than were other evaluated fluoroscopic procedures. Future studies should focus on quantitative radiation monitoring for patients and operators, importance of operator training, intraoperative safety measures, and protocols for postoperative monitoring of patients.",
author = "Hersh-Boyle, {Rebecca A.} and Culp, {William T} and Brown, {Dorothy C.} and Luskin, {Austin C.} and Amy Kapatkin and Po-Yen Chou and Agnello, {Kimberly A.} and Reetz, {Jennifer A.} and Oyama, {Mark A.} and Visser, {Lance C.} and Carrie Palm and Clarke, {Dana L.}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2460/ajvr.80.6.558",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "80",
pages = "558--564",
journal = "American Journal of Veterinary Research",
issn = "0002-9645",
publisher = "American Veterinary Medical Association",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radiation exposure of dogs and cats undergoing fluoroscopic procedures and for operators performing those procedures

AU - Hersh-Boyle, Rebecca A.

AU - Culp, William T

AU - Brown, Dorothy C.

AU - Luskin, Austin C.

AU - Kapatkin, Amy

AU - Chou, Po-Yen

AU - Agnello, Kimberly A.

AU - Reetz, Jennifer A.

AU - Oyama, Mark A.

AU - Visser, Lance C.

AU - Palm, Carrie

AU - Clarke, Dana L.

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate radiation exposure of dogs and cats undergoing procedures requiring intraoperative fluoroscopy and for operators performing those procedures. SAMPLE: 360 fluoroscopic procedures performed at 2 academic institutions between 2012 and 2015. PROCEDURES: Fluoroscopic procedures were classified as vascular, urinary, respiratory, cardiac, gastrointestinal, and orthopedic. Fluoroscopy operators were classified as interventional radiology-trained clinicians, orthopedic surgeons, soft tissue surgeons, internists, and cardiologists. Total radiation exposure in milligrays and total fluoroscopy time in minutes were obtained from dose reports for 4 C-arm units. Kruskal-Wallis equality of populations rank tests and Dunn pairwise comparisons were used to compare differences in time and exposure among procedures and operators. RESULTS: Fluoroscopy time (median, 35.80 minutes; range, 0.60 to 84.70 minutes) was significantly greater and radiation exposure (median, 137.00 mGy; range, 3.00 to 617.51 mGy) was significantly higher for vascular procedures than for other procedures. Median total radiation exposure was significantly higher for procedures performed by interventional radiology-trained clinicians (16.10 mGy; range, 0.44 to 617.50 mGy), cardiologists (25.82 mGy; range, 0.33 to 287.45 mGy), and internists (25.24 mGy; range, 3.58 to 185.79 mGy). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Vascular fluoroscopic procedures were associated with significantly longer fluoroscopy time and higher radiation exposure than were other evaluated fluoroscopic procedures. Future studies should focus on quantitative radiation monitoring for patients and operators, importance of operator training, intraoperative safety measures, and protocols for postoperative monitoring of patients.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate radiation exposure of dogs and cats undergoing procedures requiring intraoperative fluoroscopy and for operators performing those procedures. SAMPLE: 360 fluoroscopic procedures performed at 2 academic institutions between 2012 and 2015. PROCEDURES: Fluoroscopic procedures were classified as vascular, urinary, respiratory, cardiac, gastrointestinal, and orthopedic. Fluoroscopy operators were classified as interventional radiology-trained clinicians, orthopedic surgeons, soft tissue surgeons, internists, and cardiologists. Total radiation exposure in milligrays and total fluoroscopy time in minutes were obtained from dose reports for 4 C-arm units. Kruskal-Wallis equality of populations rank tests and Dunn pairwise comparisons were used to compare differences in time and exposure among procedures and operators. RESULTS: Fluoroscopy time (median, 35.80 minutes; range, 0.60 to 84.70 minutes) was significantly greater and radiation exposure (median, 137.00 mGy; range, 3.00 to 617.51 mGy) was significantly higher for vascular procedures than for other procedures. Median total radiation exposure was significantly higher for procedures performed by interventional radiology-trained clinicians (16.10 mGy; range, 0.44 to 617.50 mGy), cardiologists (25.82 mGy; range, 0.33 to 287.45 mGy), and internists (25.24 mGy; range, 3.58 to 185.79 mGy). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Vascular fluoroscopic procedures were associated with significantly longer fluoroscopy time and higher radiation exposure than were other evaluated fluoroscopic procedures. Future studies should focus on quantitative radiation monitoring for patients and operators, importance of operator training, intraoperative safety measures, and protocols for postoperative monitoring of patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067281208&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067281208&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2460/ajvr.80.6.558

DO - 10.2460/ajvr.80.6.558

M3 - Article

C2 - 31140847

AN - SCOPUS:85067281208

VL - 80

SP - 558

EP - 564

JO - American Journal of Veterinary Research

JF - American Journal of Veterinary Research

SN - 0002-9645

IS - 6

ER -